Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

New Tower - Who Pays For It?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2009, 08:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
New Tower - Who Pays For It?

From the 'Broome Advertiser' dated Nov 26.........

"Broome's skyline could soon have a new addition in the form of a 20m tall air traffic control tower and aviation fire service building.
The tower, to be built at Broome International Airport next year, is expected to cost about $6.5million and will be roughly the same size as the current Bureau of Met. tower adjacent to the airport, making it one of the tallest structures in Broome."

The article goes on to say that the increase in pax numbers this year had led to an upgrade of the services.
"There's been a fire service in Broome for a number of years. However, once the number of passengers is over 350,000 a year we provide the air traffic control service" - according to a spokesman for AsA.

The new aviation fire service building will be incorporated into the control tower building....

Does this cost get 'passed on' to the operators who fly in / out of Broome, as well as paying AsA for the ATC service?

Not forgetting the charges to BIA for the provision of their services?

How will this affect the 'tourist' operators?
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 10:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney Harbour
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AsA are paying for it out of the goodness of their heart.....
Dangly Bits is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2009, 14:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WLG (FORMERLY PER)
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
"There's been a fire service in Broome for a number of years. However, once the number of passengers is over 350,000 a year we provide the air traffic control service" - according to a spokesman for AsA.
then either the paper or AsA need to check their facts...fire service linked to pax but tower? No.
topend3 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2009, 00:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 57
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noted that in CASA's May 2009 paper one of the recommendations was to apply "business controls to limit (or manage) traffic movements during the daily RPT arrival and departure peak periods to those levels experienced in the Dry season 2008. BIA has agreed to implement these controls."

"Business controls" sounds awfully like "send a price signal"

Airpsace reforms will still just be moving the bottleneck until the lack of full strength parallel taxiways (identified as a threat) has been addressed. But I guess that's infrastructure spending that nobody wants to make.
Like This - Do That is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2009, 00:59
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up The 116E, Stbd Turn at 32S...:-)
Age: 82
Posts: 3,096
Received 45 Likes on 20 Posts
G'Day 'Topend',

That's how it was reported - however I do belive the 'tower' is linked to the 'traffic complexity' and the number of 'movements'.....

Cheers
Ex FSO GRIFFO is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2009, 21:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The land down-under
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like always in this end of the business it's simple. CASA says "Jump", AsA says "How high?"
Dick N. Cider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.