Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

New Dynon Skyview

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Nov 2009, 22:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Dynon Skyview

These are due out shortly.

Why am I getting excited? Because they are dirt CHEAP like really CHEAP. You'd probably pay multiple 10's of thousands for a certified equivalant.

Dynon Avionics - SkyView Intro
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 01:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a great bit of kit!!!

Will that give terrain in IMC? Would make IFR flying a dream (and mountain flying in places like PNG a little easier!!)
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 01:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Devil

Agreed OS

And as discussed privately, I think its great gear, but it can be seen two ways. Might help save some bastards life one day by giving them what they need to avoid smacking into the top of a hill. Or it may encourage cowboy topguns in their VFR only ops to push further into trouble thinking they have the tools to do so, just like the military boys can.

Double edged sword.

Still if I was in your shoes on your production schedule I would be doubling my Dynon budget for the Skyview. The Classic though is still better bang for buck, but hey the new gear looks the goods!

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 02:09
  #4 (permalink)  
vme
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toowoomba Australia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from the Dynon website:::

Australian Government Approves Dynon's Instruments

The Australian government Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) recently released a letter stating that all of Dynon's EFIS and EMS systems may be fitted as non-required equipment in certified aircraft. While it cannot replace an existing required instrument or display, it may be installed as a backup instrument as long as it does not contravene the design standard of the certified aircraft.
Dynon is very excited to see the progressive view of the Australian government. We believe their position largely coincides with that of the vast majority of pilots and aircraft owners we have visited with over the past few years who see great value in using our equipment as backup instrumentation.
Dynon's Australian representative, Tony Brand from Horsham Aviation Services, has noted what a great development this represents to enhancing safety and also saving his customers costly repairs. Having replaced many failed mechanical gyros over the years, he feels the Dynon's solid-state EFIS systems will greatly enhance safety as backups to the traditional attitude instruments. He also noted a particular instance where Dynon's EMS-D10 engine monitor detected an engine problem that had previously gone undetected. This finding ultimately saved the aircraft owner many thousands of dollars.
It remains to be seen whether the FAA will someday agree with CASA's position. The recent major concessions to the traditional certification methods for Light Sport Aircraft which accept non-certified avionics for VFR operations together with CASA's recent announcement may be an early signal of change for the future. Only time will tell.
vme is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 02:31
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen that on their site and I have no idea what the point of it is....... I would have thought that you could put ANY non-tso'ed instrument in as long as it's not replacing a tso'ed one. It just appears to be marketing hype.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 02:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Have a D10 in a J160 (certified) since new. Has a sign "uncalibrated instrument" etc. Also came with a falcon? altimeter which was presumably what you were supposed to use.

After about 18 months it was obvious what was more reliable and trustworthy.
Deaf is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 03:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks,
Have a look at Aspen, particularly for amazingly easy retrofit
for certified (TSO'd/CAO) requirements
--- and given the "cost of ownership" of all the instruments they replace, they are also cheap --- to own and operate.
The STC list covers just about anything with wings.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 04:14
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have a D10 in a J160 (certified) since new. Has a sign "uncalibrated instrument" etc. Also came with a falcon? altimeter which was presumably what you were supposed to use.

After about 18 months it was obvious what was more reliable and trustworthy.
You can use anything you like in the Jab as none of the instruments are certified in them except for the Transponder if fitted.

Labelling with "uncalibrated instrument" on the D10 and "Transponder not calibrated" saves them a hundred and a half when they build the aircraft as they don't pay for the rad-47, that's your responsibility. It would be nice to think that when you pay $100k for a brand new aircraft that your transponder is actually ready to use: dream on.


The point of this discussion in my mind is the cost. These units are more like $5k than the $25k+ that you'd need for a TSO'ed one.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 04:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice Gear from Aspen indeed Leadsled.

I think Owen Stanley is well qualified to comment on its performance in IMC in southern parts of Australia .

J

We shall see how we go in the run to RLL .

.........and i wonder if they should be offered as a back up for long over water jet medivacs

Last edited by Jabawocky; 24th Nov 2009 at 04:37.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 05:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having had the privilege of flying a 210 which had the Dynon D10 and EMS fitted as standby instruments I concur that they perform much better than the old steam driven stuff which is "certified".

I believe that Dynon does, or intends to, release certified systems later but at present they don't wish to certify because it means that for the present they can upgrade their product without the expense of certifying any change.

It is fantastic stuff to use.
PLovett is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 12:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I reckon something like that would have prevented the Lockhart River, and other prangs. The sooner they get into general use the better. They will sell thousands of them.
bushy is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 08:54
  #12 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or it may encourage cowboy topguns in their VFR only ops to push further into trouble thinking they have the tools to do so, just like the military boys can.
Three should do it, one with it's own independent power supply...
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 11:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lost in the space-time continuum
Posts: 459
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
These are due out shortly.

I wonder if Jabawocky has room in the Retard Vehicle for one of these babies???

Why am I getting excited? Because they are dirt CHEAP like really CHEAP. You'd probably pay multiple 10's of thousands for a certified equivalant.
Was going to put this piece of kit in the 210. Unfortunately, even with the 7" screen it won't fit in the R/H side of the panel. The unit is about 1/2 an inch to big. Bummer.
gassed budgie is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2009, 21:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Then dont read every second post........... cheeeez

And actually my 1.2 seater is even better.........so there!
Arnold E is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2009, 11:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Onya Arnie

At least we have something to contribute! even if only about 15-20 people on hear appreciate it........yes they do....just silent most of the time.

So Wanabe.....what contribution have you to make?
Jabawocky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.