GAAP rules changed again ?
Thread Starter
GAAP rules changed again ?
Just heard YMMB ATIS - they have dropped the bit about clearance for non-active runways - does this mean CASA have retracted that silly requirement ?
The requirement is now in AIP WEF 19 Nov 09 therefore we no longer have a requirement to put it on the ATIS.
Same with the Start Approval Required for Circuits. There is a permanent NOTAM out (at least for YPJT) so we no longer put it on the ATIS. Don't turn up at the holding point without a start though or you will almost certainly be turned away.
Same with the Start Approval Required for Circuits. There is a permanent NOTAM out (at least for YPJT) so we no longer put it on the ATIS. Don't turn up at the holding point without a start though or you will almost certainly be turned away.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: downunder
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What could possibly be the benefit of having to obtain a clearance to taxi past the under shoot and over shoot of a runway that is inactive and no one is using surely this is a ridiculous waste of ATC and pilots time
GAAP procedures when are they going to make their mind up and stop changing it all the time for F**K sake at YPPF the procedures have just been reversed back to what they were before the last change
GAAP procedures when are they going to make their mind up and stop changing it all the time for F**K sake at YPPF the procedures have just been reversed back to what they were before the last change
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for F**K sake at YPPF the procedures have just been reversed back to what they were before the last change
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BackPressure,
FWIW this is now occuring on Bankstown ATIS as well and has caused many a pilots starting up for circuits to forget to request permission. I guess ASA thinks those big signs they put up on the main airport avenues is a good enough hint as well as the brochures they send out
FWIW this is now occuring on Bankstown ATIS as well and has caused many a pilots starting up for circuits to forget to request permission. I guess ASA thinks those big signs they put up on the main airport avenues is a good enough hint as well as the brochures they send out
Acutally ASA assumes, perhaps incorrectly, that people will read their AIP and their NOTAMs prior to flight. Why would we keep putting it in the ATIS when its in AIP and NOTAMs.
Of course based on the number of people we have to educate everytime we are on single runway at JT I am betting the majority of people do not look at the NOTAMs prior to flight...
Of course based on the number of people we have to educate everytime we are on single runway at JT I am betting the majority of people do not look at the NOTAMs prior to flight...