Wikiposts
Search

Notices
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Two questions on alcohol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th October 2009 | 04:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: The aussie part of pprune
Two questions on alcohol

1) For pilots the limit is 0.02, does the eight hour bottle to throttle rule still apply?.. Now that there is a BAC limit...

2) What are airline company policies such as QF for flight crew, I guess something like none 24 hours prior to signing on?
multi_engined is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 05:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Hi multi-engined,

1) The regulations have not changed.

2) Qantas operates to the regulations.
*Lancer* is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 06:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: inside of a pretty bustard
as I know, 24 hrs policy related to alcohol is for airlines such JAL, Singapore ,Cathay,Malayesian, ANA,Korean, etc, for european and united states is 8 hrs policy.....what I do not know is for russian, maybe to be reduced at 3-4 hrs
airman13 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 06:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: EU
The alcohol limit depends on which country you're in... 2 UK pilots where not allowed to board their plane when they were on the "UK" limit of 0,02 in Helsinki where the limit is 0...

if you're flying from a country that has limits which are more strict, those limits apply...

Thomas Cook uses 9 hours...
Founder is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 07:12
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hiding between the Animal Bar and the Suave Bar
For pilots the limit is 0.02
With some trepidation ... where did you get this number from ?
Unhinged is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 07:33
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 410
From: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
0.02

CASR 1998 Part 99

Drug and alcohol management plans and testing.
Capt Fathom is online now  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 07:39
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 980
Likes: 13
From: Sydney, Australia
Am I right in thinking the reason for the 0.02 is that the testing recently brought in can't do any better or something like that? Admitedly I remember reading it here so it's likely I have been led up the garden path !
mcgrath50 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 07:59
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 62
From: North Queensland, Australia
It makes for an interesting legal concept if they put such a limit on it - surely someone could argue that it doesn't matter how the 0.02 comes about, left over from the previous night or a quick coldie during the walkaround!
Arm out the window is online now  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 08:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Arm,
unless you did the walkaround 8hrs before you flew it and had the coldie then (despite the fact that you'd probably be zero by then anyway), CAR 256 (3) would still apply:

in short "no grog 8 hours before departure" would still apply.


mcgrath, i think when the AOD info packs came out, it had something stating that a reading below 0.02 is taken to be sober for some reason, maybe due accuracy or the potential of false zeros.
however i cannot find anything yet that had the explanation on it.
MyNameIsIs is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 08:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Australia
The whole '8 hour' concept is a legal minefield. How do you prove that the drink in the photo is alcoholic? How do you prove that you actually ingested from the glass in your hand?

You can prove your BAC is over a threshold.

Notwithstanding the fact that if you accidentally had a sip of something within the 8 hours (picked up someone else's glass for example), you're unfit to operate. Silly.
*Lancer* is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 08:15
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 980
Likes: 13
From: Sydney, Australia
Interestingly I read this just today on the issue of charging pilots for alcohol consumption Cockpit Chronicles: "Flying Drunk" by Joe Balzer | Gadling.com
mcgrath50 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 08:44
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 825
Likes: 7
From: Sydney Australia
Quote:
For pilots the limit is 0.02
With some trepidation ... where did you get this number from ?
CASR Part 99 says the permitted level is -

(b) for alcohol — a level of alcohol of less than 0.02 grams of alcohol in 210 litres of breath.
Why 0.02? Possibly like drivng alcolol tests. A small amount can be present from medications etc and rather than get into that debate it's a practical solution to let readings of 0.02 or less go through.
bentleg is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 08:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Darwin
I think CASA cockheads have realized that GA operators are tight asses and they testing equipment they buy will be !!!!! 0.02 otherwise alot of pilots will fail testing due listerine, cinnamon or chewing gum. Or being hungover?
longrass is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 09:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Permanently lost
The limit of 0.02 is to allow for the inherent inaccuracy in the testing equipment. For those who have been random breath tested the equipment used there has a higher inaccuracy factor which is why it is only used as a screener, to sort out those that need to be tested versus those that don't. The real reading for court purposes is the thing used either back at the station or in the random booze bus.

In effect a 0.02 reading means zero blood/alcohol. If you are in excess it doesn't matter how it got there, whether it is the residue from the previous night or whatever is immaterial. Incidentally, a quick one on the walk-around will register far more than 0.02 due to the residual alcohol in the mouth. That is why when you are breath tested (at least for motor vehicle offences - I haven't look at the regs for pilots) they have to wait at least 15 minutes before taking the breath sample.

You have no idea of the number of people convicted of being in excess of 0.05 the morning after a heavy night on the turps because there just hasn't been sufficient time to metabolise the alcohol out of their system. The last I heard of that was to allow for a metabolisation rate of 0.01 per hour but that figure is now over 10 years old. Use it at your peril.

If you want some other rules of thumb from that era then work on 0.028 per stubbie or can of full strength beer. It will take approximately 45 minutes for the full effect of the alcohol to take effect but your body will immediately start to metabolise the alcohol (which is after all, a poison) out of the body. Wine takes about 30 minutes to be absorbed and spirits about 15 minutes.

Metabolism rates vary hugely. The figure of 0.01 was the lowest recorded rate of metabolism up to about 10 years ago. I don't know whether it has changed or not since then. All of the stuff that people says will lower their blood/alcohol limit is a crock of ****. It is the metabolism rate that changes.

For the females who may read this be aware that for the same amount of alcohol consumed you will read higher than your male counterparts. You have more fat cells in your body makeup and alcohol is attracted to fat.

Finally, if anyone relies on the above to try and get a skin full and then to be under the limit to go flying they are a bleedin' idiot and deserve everything that may come their way.
PLovett is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 10:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
AFAIK, most countries have a limit of somewhere around 0.02 because anything below that can come for any variety of sources (food, medication) that has nothing to do with alcohol consumption. Then there is also the accuracy of the testing equipment. How countries that have a 0,0 limit deal with this, I don't know.
172driver is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 10:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Darwin
And the wisdom of longy spelt it out in one sentence
longrass is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 11:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Australia
How does equipment inaccuracy and residual mouthwash affect P and L platers?
*Lancer* is offline  
Reply
Old 17th October 2009 | 22:00
  #18 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 825
Likes: 7
From: Sydney Australia
How does equipment inaccuracy and residual mouthwash affect P and L platers?
The same way as it affects everyone else..........
bentleg is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2009 | 00:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Earth
CX Policy

CX = bottle to 10hrs prior to sign on BUT also me free from alcohol
629bus is offline  
Reply
Old 18th October 2009 | 01:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 1
From: Mel-burn
The Victorian State government is contemplating the road alcohol limit to .02. We will probably see more of it in the future.
VH-XXX is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.