How dumb is this.......
Thread Starter
How dumb is this.......
....and who allows it to happen?
I was just perusing BNE departures for MEL tonight and see that JQ637 departs at 1820 while QF637 departs at 1855. Both are stand alone flights albeit to different destinations but using the same airspace for most of their way south.
Surely there must be some coordination of schedules and flight numbers between JQ and QF to minimise any possibility of a clash (and to help ATC) or is this proof that JQ is really operated as a separate entity quite divorced from its parent?
I was just perusing BNE departures for MEL tonight and see that JQ637 departs at 1820 while QF637 departs at 1855. Both are stand alone flights albeit to different destinations but using the same airspace for most of their way south.
Surely there must be some coordination of schedules and flight numbers between JQ and QF to minimise any possibility of a clash (and to help ATC) or is this proof that JQ is really operated as a separate entity quite divorced from its parent?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even from the other side of the world I can see that he is referring to the callsigns!
This is a potential problem, unless the callsign is not the same the flightnumber, which is becoming quite common to prevent problems.
This is a potential problem, unless the callsign is not the same the flightnumber, which is becoming quite common to prevent problems.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to worry Ken, we have professional air traffic controllers here who will use different voice inflections for the two different call signs should there be any confusion. I fear more for the Jetstar punters knowing which gate to board from. Hopefully they'll know the difference between a Kangaroo and a Star.
Gee Ken,
And your point is???
(Qantas637 vs '****tyknickers'637 some 35 min later.....I think I could 'have got' that....)
Probably had some 5 or 10 'others' in the meantime, so no 'real' confusion I would think.
And your point is???
(Qantas637 vs '****tyknickers'637 some 35 min later.....I think I could 'have got' that....)
Probably had some 5 or 10 'others' in the meantime, so no 'real' confusion I would think.
Thread Starter
Penko - thanks but we appear to have some dumbos in these parts as well who just don't understand that if the first aircraft runs ever so slightly late, has a near identical call-sign to a following aircraft (Jetstar six thirty seven versus Qantas six thirty seven), the potential for confusion and a dangerous situation arises.
Aside from the operational considerations in the selection of flight numbers, one would have thought that two airlines from the one stable would have the sense to ensure that their respective services would be unequivocally easily identified by the customers.
Aside from the operational considerations in the selection of flight numbers, one would have thought that two airlines from the one stable would have the sense to ensure that their respective services would be unequivocally easily identified by the customers.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: what should be capital of Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to ensure that their respective services would be unequivocally easily identified by the customers
Then there's the fact that one has a proper service and the other is all about squeezing $$$'s from the SLF.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Qantas" and "Jetstar" sound totally different....
no confusion here.
now if it was Qantas 637 and Qantas 673.. then there might be the slim chance of confusion, but both aircraft are 30 mins apart, again, no real issue.
no confusion here.
now if it was Qantas 637 and Qantas 673.. then there might be the slim chance of confusion, but both aircraft are 30 mins apart, again, no real issue.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Zealand
Age: 37
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I heard a two Air Nelson flights (call sign "Link+xxx") with similar numbers getting confused with each other the other day. That was pretty funny and since they were both descending through 6,000-ish at about the same time there was plenty of opportunity. One of the 1st officers was an old instructor of mine which probably helped my humour. It was a quiet day so no safety issues, otherwise I'd be a terrible person to enjoy it.
Sorry, just thought I'd share...
Sorry, just thought I'd share...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Age: 40
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is nothing... I regularly get VOZ1592 and VOZ1692 on frequency at the same time and sometimes only 20nm apart.
The other dodgy one I saw once was VIR1200 (Virgin Atlantic repositioning flight) and VOZ1200 both airborne at the same time. Good thing they weren't on the same frequency as it could have become rather confusing...
The other dodgy one I saw once was VIR1200 (Virgin Atlantic repositioning flight) and VOZ1200 both airborne at the same time. Good thing they weren't on the same frequency as it could have become rather confusing...
Talk about storm in a teacup - submitting an Event Report for possible callsign confusion is a complete and utter waste of time and effort. Professional pilots and ATC should be able to cope - if not, I suggest there are plenty of other jobs where they may fit in.
I wonder how we managed when there was a lot more use of HF.
I wonder how we managed when there was a lot more use of HF.
QFA958 AND QFA598, arrive same time every night.
And it gets stuffed up almost every night by either a pilot or a controller.
QF were asked if they could change it.
Five years ago.
And it gets stuffed up almost every night by either a pilot or a controller.
QF were asked if they could change it.
Five years ago.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you think that's bad you wanna try flying from an airfied that bought 4 Jabirus at the same time with consecutive registrations all in the circuit at the same time and they are 4 figure numbers! Which one of you was on final again? Almost impossible to track them based on your memory.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on guys, Ken raises a valid point. My airline has a program (pioneered by Air Fance if I'm not mistaken) to avoid just this kind of callsign confusion, because it does happen a lot, especially in busy airspace. If for example we have an XXX5421 and YYY5421 or even a YYY5241 departing within an hour of each other, the latter is given the callsign the callsign is transformed into XXX421A.
This has nothing to do with professionalism or a lack thereoff, but with realising the human factors behind an airline operation in busy commercial airspace.
This has nothing to do with professionalism or a lack thereoff, but with realising the human factors behind an airline operation in busy commercial airspace.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: united kingdom
Age: 63
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Penko I think that you are correct about it being invented by the French
I have seen enough nasty incidents in my job caused by similar callsigns that aren't as close as these by Qantas and Jet star that i have to agree with Ken that this is an incident/accident waiting to happen if they are really used in anger.
Our policy is that if we find callsigns that even just sound similar on R/T we go to the airlines and get one or other to change them - most of the time they agree. But then I don't know how many callsign confusion incidents you have had.
I have seen enough nasty incidents in my job caused by similar callsigns that aren't as close as these by Qantas and Jet star that i have to agree with Ken that this is an incident/accident waiting to happen if they are really used in anger.
Our policy is that if we find callsigns that even just sound similar on R/T we go to the airlines and get one or other to change them - most of the time they agree. But then I don't know how many callsign confusion incidents you have had.