CASA Proposed Rule Changes for Non-Tower Aerodromes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CASA Proposed Rule Changes for Non-Tower Aerodromes
Came upon CASA Notice of proposed rule making 09080S today,
Main changes outlined as:
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(d) and subregulation (4) - base-leg circuit join no longer prohibited.
Amend CAR 166 paragraph (2)(f) to allow for non-into wind runway use when the AFM permits.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(g) - 500m minimum length of the final approach leg no longer mandated.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(a) – carriage of a serviceable VHF radio when conducting a straight-in approach no longer required (other than at certified, registered and other designated aerodromes).
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(b) – specific mandated broadcast for straight-in approaches deleted (although still recommended in CAAPs/AIP).
Amendment of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(d) - reduction in the minimum distance from the threshold by which an aircraft making a straight-in approach must be aligned with the runway, from at least 5 miles to not less than 3 miles.
Any thoughts anyone. Personally I think being able to join on base would be a good thing, especially with a left hand circuit since I can see everyone.
J
Main changes outlined as:
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(d) and subregulation (4) - base-leg circuit join no longer prohibited.
Amend CAR 166 paragraph (2)(f) to allow for non-into wind runway use when the AFM permits.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(g) - 500m minimum length of the final approach leg no longer mandated.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(a) – carriage of a serviceable VHF radio when conducting a straight-in approach no longer required (other than at certified, registered and other designated aerodromes).
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(b) – specific mandated broadcast for straight-in approaches deleted (although still recommended in CAAPs/AIP).
Amendment of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(d) - reduction in the minimum distance from the threshold by which an aircraft making a straight-in approach must be aligned with the runway, from at least 5 miles to not less than 3 miles.
Any thoughts anyone. Personally I think being able to join on base would be a good thing, especially with a left hand circuit since I can see everyone.
J
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(d) and subregulation (4) - base-leg circuit join no longer prohibited.
Amend CAR 166 paragraph (2)(f) to allow for non-into wind runway use when the AFM permits.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (2)(g) - 500m minimum length of the final approach leg no longer mandated.
Withdrawal of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(a) – carriage of a serviceable VHF radio when conducting a straight-in approach no longer required (other than at certified, registered and other designated aerodromes).
Amendment of CAR 166 paragraph (3)(d) - reduction in the minimum distance from the threshold by which an aircraft making a straight-in approach must be aligned with the runway, from at least 5 miles to not less than 3 miles.
- base-leg circuit join no longer prohibited.
- allow for non-into wind runway use when the AFM permits.
- 500m minimum length of the final approach leg no longer mandated.
– carriage of a serviceable VHF radio when conducting a straight-in approach no longer required
– specific mandated broadcast for straight-in approaches deleted
- reduction in the minimum distance from the threshold by which an aircraft making a straight-in approach must be aligned with the runway, from at least 5 miles to not less than 3 miles
- allow for non-into wind runway use when the AFM permits.
- 500m minimum length of the final approach leg no longer mandated.
– carriage of a serviceable VHF radio when conducting a straight-in approach no longer required
– specific mandated broadcast for straight-in approaches deleted
- reduction in the minimum distance from the threshold by which an aircraft making a straight-in approach must be aligned with the runway, from at least 5 miles to not less than 3 miles
Dr
Qlink are already doin it, I heard one at Mt Isa the other day joining an 'oblique' 5 mile final. Laughed hard.
So if tracking via the RNAV, technically you would be on an "oblique final" in laymans terms? Just a thought
I think all these changes seem pretty good, especially the base leg join.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NT
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a feeling that Dick, for all his faults, might have been a prime-mover in bashing some sense in when it comes to joining on base.
So, Dick, if you had a hand in this, take a deserved bow!
Doesn't offset the terminal E BS argument, but that's another debate.
FTDrK, Seems your SOPs have been way ahead of the pack. Maybe you should offer your services as a GA consultant! I understand the going rate is around 1700 a day.
By the way, I often wonder whether you hear the ghosts of BE35s-past. There can't be too many aircraft left for Buddy, Ritchie and the Big Bopper to hitch a ride on when the weather is sh@t!
Beautiful little aircraft!
So, Dick, if you had a hand in this, take a deserved bow!
Doesn't offset the terminal E BS argument, but that's another debate.
FTDrK, Seems your SOPs have been way ahead of the pack. Maybe you should offer your services as a GA consultant! I understand the going rate is around 1700 a day.
By the way, I often wonder whether you hear the ghosts of BE35s-past. There can't be too many aircraft left for Buddy, Ritchie and the Big Bopper to hitch a ride on when the weather is sh@t!
Beautiful little aircraft!
So if tracking via the RNAV, technically you would be on an "oblique final" in laymans terms? Just a thought
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well done to Dick Smith for the change with the base leg join (assuming the new rules are implemented that is). Just a thought when it comes to Q-Link and other RPT, I much prefer when they talk in layman's terms, ie. I am XX miles to the N/S/E/W etc. I don't carry an approach plate around with me thank you very much. I also try to give those blokes as much room as necessary, hard enough trying to bring a dash 8 into a small airport let alone when every man and his dog is in the circuit. Thats why I can understand when they get the s*(ts and act like portable control towers. Personally I believe its an accident waiting to happen, but hey that's a matter for another thread and another day.