Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

c152 missing between Hamilton and New Plymouth NZ POB1

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

c152 missing between Hamilton and New Plymouth NZ POB1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2009, 10:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the Auzzie outback
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c152 missing between Hamilton and New Plymouth NZ POB1

It's pretty mountainous 35km's west of Te Kuiti and it's now night time.
Hope he ok

3 News > Home > Story > Search launched for missing plane

CLD AREAS SCT ST 1200 DEVELOPING IN EXTREME SW.
AREAS BKN CUSC 2500 TOPS 7000.
AREAS BKN ASAC ABV 7000 SPREADING FM SW THIS AFTERNOON.
WX ISOL -SHRA, WITH SCT SHRA/RA DEVELOPING IN WEST.
TURB OCNL MOD DEVELOPING, MAY BECOME SEVERE, SIGMET
POSSIBLE.
ICE ISOL MOD ABV 6000 DEVELOPING WITH ASAC.
REMARK TROUGH FROM SOUTHWEST VC NZNP 12Z.

Last edited by dabz; 21st Jul 2009 at 10:36.
dabz is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 10:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Updated news

Search on for missing plane | Stuff.co.nz
Nikai is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 12:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the 3 News article:
The beacon has been reportedly found 35km west of Te Kuiti, however there is still no sign of the plane.
I hope that's just bad reporting and they didn't actually find the beacon lying on it's lonesome in the bush
sleemanj is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 13:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australandnewzealandland
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the NZ Herald website, the pilot holds a commercial and is completing an instructor rating.
dudduddud is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 14:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: All over
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
406's

Ain't these compulsory newfandango elba's/eperbs suppose to emit via satellite the a/c's lat & long?

Would have thought they'd know exactly where it is and be hovering over it hours ago (wx permitting).
Lineboy4life is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 19:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NZ
Age: 35
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very sad news, hopefully he's alright and will be found.
riseagainst is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 21:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lineboy4life

As you stated, the weather certainly was'nt suitable.
Little NOTAR is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 22:41
  #8 (permalink)  
Water Wings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Anyone else confused by this?

1850 he is overhead Raglan heading to NP but at 1930 the beacon is activated well inland??

So at night, in average Weather, the plane left the coast and flew inland??

Edit: Just saw the news and see the aircraft was found on the coastline near TT not inland.

Last edited by Water Wings; 21st Jul 2009 at 23:02.
 
Old 21st Jul 2009, 23:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere in Indo...
Age: 48
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not good news

Pilot of missing Cessna confirmed dead | NATIONAL News

Condolences to family and friends...
HardCorePawn is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2009, 23:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My previous weather statement was in regard to flying into the crash site, not the conditions around the time of the crash.

Last edited by Little NOTAR; 22nd Jul 2009 at 00:06.
Little NOTAR is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 00:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ain't these compulsory newfandango elba's/eperbs suppose to emit via satellite the a/c's lat & long?
Only if it is GPS capable. If it's not, then it's up to doppler triangulation, which give something like a 5km radius area.

Would have thought they'd know exactly where it is and be hovering over it hours ago (wx permitting).
wx was not permitting in this case, they tried several times
sleemanj is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 03:42
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Picture here:

Police name dead pilot as Ben Israel Gaastra | Stuff.co.nz
sleemanj is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 06:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only if it is GPS capable

I'm sure he's referring to the new 406.025 beacons

The 406MHz unit once registered will inform RCC whom the EPIRB, ELT or PLB belongs to and provide an accuracy of less than one square mile versus 1200 square miles.
Quoted from the supplier's website.

Condolences to his family and the NP Aeroclub, this is just awful.
kiwi chick is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 09:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Codolences to Family and friends
I believe these 406 are obselete shouldnt all aircraft be carrying either TRac Plus or Spider track much superior
Three Blader is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 10:00
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spidertracks is a privately owned company - it is up to the operator to run it in the plane. It has nothing to do with the ELT

406 is the new standard - you can choose to have one with an external GPS input, at extra expense, otherwise the 406 is just more relaible, and more accurate to home in on, the the 121.5/243 ELT
toolowtoofast is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 10:15
  #16 (permalink)  
Hughesy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What was a fresh CPL pilot, training for a instructors rating doing flying over pretty rough terrain( or any for that matter), at night in bad weather conditions? To go from North shore to his destination in these unstable weather conditions would be interesting enough during the day let alone in failing light.
Sincere condolances to the pilot, his family and friends and colleagues.
 
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 11:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hughsey I was wondering exactly the same thing, but wasn't sure who was reading this and didn't want to upset anyone.

Will be interesting to hear the outcome. (Apologies to any friends or family, but this is something we can all learn from and lest take heed)

Threeblader - are you a new pilot?
kiwi chick is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 12:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In the Jungle
Age: 39
Posts: 285
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
To be fair he wasn't a 'fresh CPL'. Still the choice to go in those conditions will no doubt be a focus of the accident report.

A very sad state of affairs and all the more real when you actually know the person.

RIP Ben.
Massey058 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 14:47
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kiwi chick
I'm sure he's referring to the new 406.025 beacons
Getting off topic, but...

406 beacons can be of two types, the first basically just shouts "help". The second uses a GPS feed to say "help, here's where I am".

Without the GPS the position can not be determined as accurately, nor as fast, as it relies on triangulation of the beacon's signal using the doppler shift of the signal as the satellite(s) pass by it. More readings, better accuracy, smaller search area, but it takes valuable time.

The GPS equipped/capable versions are more expensive - but not by much in the scheme of things.
sleemanj is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2009, 17:47
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was a fresh CPL pilot, training for a instructors rating doing flying over pretty rough terrain( or any for that matter), at night in bad weather conditions?
More to the point, why was he doing it at low level, whilst clearly uncertain of his position, and with no radio calls for navigation assistance? It looks to me like CFIT (as no mayday call for a failed engine which you would expect a new-ish CPL studying for an Instructor's rating to have got off).

Being lost at low level in adverse wx is bad enough, but to do it at night...

Yeah, I know, wait for the report...
remoak is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.