Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Foreign Students Training in Oz.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jul 2009, 16:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Delhi
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The second article mentions the following:

"A SYDNEY flying school was using unqualified trainers to teach large numbers of Indian students in a "critical" breach of standards, the State Government's education watchdog says."

"...the use of trainers who do not have the qualifications required by the Australian Quality Training Framework was considered to be a critical non-compliance that required action."

What sort of qualifications are they referring to? I don't think any organization would be stupid enough to hire instructors without the appropriate licences and ratings.

I'm guessing the article is instead referring to some other specific training required by employees of registered training organizations (RTOs). I remember vaguely, that during my training, all the instructors in my school underwent a week long cert. iv course. I seem to remember that none of them enjoyed it very much!

I'd be interested in specifics anyone can provide. Cheers!

wiki
WIKI44 is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 01:49
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere in Indo...
Age: 48
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flying often takes a back seat to having fun.
Eh?? I thought they were the same thing!!

Maybe I haven't been at it long enough for the fun to wear off
HardCorePawn is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2009, 01:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Gotta' agree with you there HardCore'.

I've been at it for 25years, and I still think it's the most fun you can have with your clothe's on!

Last edited by KRUSTY 34; 15th Jul 2009 at 00:48.
KRUSTY 34 is online now  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 01:03
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO I think that there's a responsibility on the part of the training organisation to set clear goals, and a responsibility of the trainee to meet those goals - wherever they come from. And if they don't, then the CPL wannabee needs to be shown the door and given a refund of the remaining $. Preferably at the point where it's clear it's not going to work, rather than when the $ run out.

Apologies if you do, again it's just that I haven't seen much discussion on that point here. Would be nice to see some positive discussion on what your organisation does in these situations or what you've seen work... anybody?

Of course, that is kinda dependent on the organisation having the appropriate qualifications in the first place!

Last edited by Foyl; 15th Jul 2009 at 01:17.
Foyl is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2009, 23:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere in Indo...
Age: 48
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over this side of the ditch... after the initial "goldrush" on Student Loans and CPL courses left a lot of 'wannabes' with massive loans, half completed licenses/diplomas and whinging parents... they changed the rules.

Basically, a school is allocated a certain number of "funded" positions, that I am led to believe is, at least partly, based on the success of the previous year(s).

This puts some of the onus back on the individual training establishments to vet the candidates (tests, interviews etc) and ensure they have a reasonable chance of success. Otherwise their allocated positions get reduced which means less "easy" $$$$

As I see it, the foreign students are effectively self-funded, so there is no real onus on the training establishments to do this... and they can just take anyone with enough cash, regardless of their ability and likelihood of success.

I know here in NZ, the foreign students need to get a student visa to undertake flight training. Is it the same in AU? If so, maybe the government could look at limiting the number of student visas allocated to a particular school, again based on previous performance. In this way, the schools would have to be a bit more careful who they take... and might take a bit more interest in the progress of the students.

Additionally, the interview and testing process would hopefully weed out the "slackers"... so you're left with the ones who are actually going to make an effort.

It is after all, a two way street...
HardCorePawn is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2009, 11:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Thats actually a pretty solid plan. I find it hard to be a bunch of kiwi socialists came up with that one
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2009, 23:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Somewhere in Indo...
Age: 48
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well... I was going to say that after proof-reading my post, it sounds entirely too logical to actually be implemented by any government

But of course they came up with the student loan funded cap AFTER their kids had all gone through the system and benefited from it :P

This letter is dated October 2003... apparently Mr Maharey's daughter was on the fully funded Student Loan CPL course in 2002

And I believe Dr Cullen had his daughter on the course prior to that...


Still, I doubt they'll cap the visa's anytime soon... too much $$$ to be had methinks... especially in these times
HardCorePawn is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.