Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Echo Loading CPL Performance, Fuel SG

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Echo Loading CPL Performance, Fuel SG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2009, 02:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Echo Loading CPL Performance, Fuel SG

Hey everyone,

Just looking for a bit of help on something thats been bothering me. I'm about to sit CPL Performance and I'm having trouble with the specific gravity of fuel used for the different loading systems.

The ATC theory book uses a SG of 0.71 for Echo Loading, whereas the Bob Tait book uses a SG of 0.72. Adding to the confusion the Bob Tait supplement uses the 0.71 figure.

Can anyone advise me as to which SG to use for which loading system. ATM I am using 0.71 for all except Bravo which uses 0.72.

Thanks in advance

J
cessna172 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 02:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use the one stated in ERSA.

Good Luck with the exam.
biggles7374 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 03:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The .01 differance isnt going to make enough difference to change the answer from wrong to right or vice versa. think about it........ thats one liter over a hundred. I cant remember the echo fuel quantity, but I doubt there would be three liters difference between full to empty.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 05:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: victoria
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.71 is what casa work on. This is the least of your worries. Good luck.
motivated68 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 08:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"kilo" loading is much better than echo.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 10:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: over there
Age: 35
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
0.72 got me through at 98%
AussieNick is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 11:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In a Shoe
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0.71 got me through at 100%
BlinkC182 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 16:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If it worries you so much, use .715 - then you'll be equally close to both correct-enough-for-the-job SGs.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 23:42
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"0.72 got me through at 98%"
"0.71 got me through at 100%"

Haha, thanks for all the help guys, much appreciated. I'm just going to use 0.72 since thats what the ERSA uses so conversions will be easier I guess. I still wish they'd make it clearer though, just that extra bit of confusion in what is already a b&(*& of an exam.

J
cessna172 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.