Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Adelaide - 05 takeoff - flight distance before turning

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Adelaide - 05 takeoff - flight distance before turning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2009, 18:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Marion, South Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adelaide - 05 takeoff - flight distance before turning

At Adelaide, aircraft departing on 05 travel a considerable distance out to sea before turning. I understand that distance is/was 5 NM.

With the revised paths now operating for landing on 05, has there been a change to the outbound distance?

I ask because I saw a B737 turn northerly fairly soon after passing over the shoreline the other day

Regards


Mike McInerney
mmciau is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 19:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Remote
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi MM

I'm not sure..but I think the runway you're actually referring to is 23 if you're talking about departing out to sea. I think it might be 1DME..but as I said, I'm not sure..Cheers P
Pilotette is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 20:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: sydney
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike.

05 takes you over land. You must mean 23.

The SID calls for runway track to the first waypoint, about 5 DME would be right. ( I don't have the chart in front of me now.)

At any time ATC can cancel SID and instruct you to turn onto a radar heading. Could this be what you saw?
zube is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 21:25
  #4 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Could have been a 'radar', or even 'visual' departure!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2009, 23:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adalaide 8 departure (RW 23)

It all depends on what sid you get.

If you saw the 737 turn fairly early on they might have been on the
Adelaide 8 departure (radar) which is maintain runway hdg (222) till at or above 600AND passing 1 DME to the south west then turn to assigned hdg. (1 DME AD is just passed the shoreline)

If they were on any other departure then they would continue to track runway hdg for longer.

Hope this helps
kd_nub is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 01:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A house
Posts: 645
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
With the revised paths now operating for landing on 05, has there been a change to the outbound distance?
Short answer is 'no'. There has been discussion about revised departure tracks as well I believe, but in the scheme of things I think that there was more 'fat' to be trimmed on the inbound tracks. (For those playing at home, there were revisions to Northern and Western inbound tracks for landing on RW23 which is used 75% of the time.)
Chadzat is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 01:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say for noise, A/C departing East go out over water longer before coming back over populated areas, whereas departures to West or North can head out over the gulf and get direct tracking earlier.
strim is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 02:53
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Marion, South Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ladies and Gentlemen!!

Sorry for the confusion I created - yes I did mean 23! - My brain fade!!

The B737 took off from 23 and at approximately half the normal straight line flight path (possibly not more than 2 NM), turned right and climbed to a North, North-East direction.


Mike
mmciau is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2009, 03:44
  #9 (permalink)  

Metrosexual
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Enroute
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could have been the Frank 1 departure outta YSSY.
Jet_A_Knight is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2009, 00:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike,

noise requirements mean jets off 23 should stay on runway track til 3nm before turning right. If they're going left they should stay runway track til 5nm then offshore til 10nm and 5000'
ianmoss is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.