Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Merged: Aircraft midair in Bankstown area

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: Aircraft midair in Bankstown area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Liberty fared a lot better:




Two die as plane hits home in Casula after mid-air crash | The Daily Telegraph

THE two pilots killed when a plane spiralled into a Sydney home following a mid-air smash were both women, it has emerged.
It is believed the pair were both aged in their late 20s.
The revelation came as the family which escaped - with their newborn baby - spoke out about their terror.
The pilot and co-pilot were killed instantly when their single-engine Cessna 152 burst into flames on impact, moments after colliding with another aircraft over Casula about 11.30am.
A student pilot and instructor aboard the second plane - a single-engine Liberty XL 2 - managed to fly from the scene and land safely at Bankstown Airport, where they were treated for shock by paramedics.

Di
Diatryma is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 286
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
I'm hearing murmurs from a few people Ken Andrews was on board the liberty?
das Uber Soldat is online now  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:12
  #23 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a tragedy no doubt, but certainly not grounds for closing an airport. I once again ask how many car accidents were had just Today in Australia?.
Are we going to have a major crack down on the road rules and start demanding the closure of highways?. I think not.
We need aviation, same as we need cars. noone goes out with the intention of killing them self's, but aviation is inherently dangerous due to its nature, as is driving along freeways. we minimize risk at every opportunity, but accidents wiil continue to happen as long as there are aircraft in the air and cars on the road.
get used to it, and move on. Its a fact of life.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BALI
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah.. heard that too. Heard it was a ppl flight test.
GA715 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:31
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Darwin, Mostly.
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Duty of Care?

Wonder if some really smart SC could clean out the developers for closing Hoxton etc for mere money, further concentrating the aircraft density @ BK.

Interesting legal ramifications if it was won and comprehensively.

Just playing devils advocate here of course.
Pharcarnell is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Over the Rainbow
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, burst into flames on impact. Typical journo, anything to sensationalise. I cant see ANY evidence of a fire at all. The blue plastic they were using to waterproof the extension is perfectly intact.

Just hope it WAS quick and they didnt suffer.RIP.
Socket is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:44
  #27 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So either the new born baby helped in the interview or was actually in the aircraft when they escaped. That being the case, I doubt it was a flight test.
Could just be an added twist to the reporting though.......anything is possible.
certainly doesnt seem to be any evidence of fire in the pictures I have seen.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:50
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So either the new born baby helped in the interview or was actually in the aircraft when they escaped
Newborn was in the house with its mother, according to other media reports.

RIP
strykerZA is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:50
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SMH says the instructor in the Liberty is 89 years old.
brendanwor is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:51
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know what damage the Liberty has? If any? From the pic it doesn't look like it has a scratch...
CTOT340 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just saw a news break on 7 and "Experts" are already "Calling" for flight training to be moved away from Bankstown.

3 hours must be a new record.

My condolences to all the Basair crew.
Matt-YSBK is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:53
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Confusion at 2RN Inbound to YSBK RWY 11 active

Another sad day, and an event that should not happen. My sympathies to all involved.

I had some anxious moments arriving over 2RN in the afternoon last September, when a twin reported 2RN inbound when I was exactly over the top and about to key my inbound call. After lots of head twisting looking for an aircraft at 2RN, it was really a twin about 2 miles to the S who called inbound early.

Now if someone calls 2RN that's exactly where they should be. It could be a fatal mistake to assume that the twin sighted to the S was the one calling over 2RN, because if it wasn't and there really was another twin at 2RN I could have ended my flying days in someone's backyard in Casula.

Seriously bad airmanship by the guy in the twin - he knew I was there and chose to make a deceptive call to get circuit entry instructions early. BK TWR was so busy I couldn't announce inbound until almost over the lake, and I was over-transmitted by another aircraft inbound from Prospect who became conflicting traffic for 11R, so I was given 11C.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but one thing I will assume is that BK TWR is able to see local traffic on radar - there needs to be some thought given to whether they can give advisories to avoid the sad event that happened today.
Ovation is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,573
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
SMH says the instructor in the Liberty is 89 years old.
Would have to be Ken then!!! Can't be too many other blokes out there pushing 90!!!
Transition Layer is online now  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 02:54
  #34 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, the baby was in the house.That would certainly make more sense. and a terrifying ordeal for the occupants of the house no doubt.
89 year old Liberty?????? wow thats far older than the average GA fleet aircraft. there really should be a qualification you have to pass before reporting aviation in the media.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Wizard of Auz, you state:

I think that as long as aircraft require airstrips, we going to be stuck with that problem Dick.
You have completely misunderstood what I have said. To actually direct aircraft at one of the busiest airports in Australia to two reporting points (viz 2RN and Prospect) is the height of stupidity. To direct VFR aircraft to any single point is risky. See my Unsafe Skies document here in relation to Hornsby.

I have just phoned John King of the King Flight Schools, and he confirmed with me that nowhere in the USA do they have “reporting points” for general aviation aircraft to all track to (and no doubt collide) on the way in to a Class D or C airport.

Let’s look at the ridiculous Prospect situation. An aircraft flying down the light aircraft lane from Brooklyn. Instead of simply calling in (say 4 miles north, or 4 miles northwest) the pilot has to track to Prospect and mix with all of the planes coming in from the west.

It is amazing we haven’t had more accidents because we introduced such a stupid arrangement.

I tried years ago to try to get people to see sense with this. Maybe now after the fatalities, we will be able to move forward and follow the proven overseas system, where VFR and IFR aircraft are not all directed to the same point where the collision risk is increased 100 fold.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:06
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Duckberg
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting comments by a witness...


A witness named Michael told 2GB: "I was up watching a plane spinning out of control. I thought it was a model plane ... "Derek Darlow, a former mechanical engineer at Hoxton Park Airport, which closed this Monday, said that the planes were probably coming in to land at Bankstown Airport.
"There is an inbound reporting point in Prestons, which planes have to pass over before they land at Bankstown Airport and the planes were probably passing over that when they clipped each other,'' Mr Darlow said.
"Now that they've closed Hoxton Park Airport, there are fewer places for these planes to land and this sort of thing will be happening more and more often.''


That last statement is sure to provoke panic and paranoia amongst BK residents. Glad to hear the Liberty got home safely, sad to hear the Cessna didn't make it.....

LP
Launchpad McQuack is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:10
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dick,
The reporting points do seem a little counter intuitive. In a CTAF situation most of us would call at 9 miles and then 3 miles before you get to your termination point the circuit and in the case of a CTAF there are 360 directions you could be coming from. In the case of the gap the first radio call is when you are at the highest statistical point where the collision can occur. (outside the circuit) Would it not make more sense to call say 3 miles from the reporting point giving your position relative to it so as other pilots know where to look. Then perhaps again at the reporting point.

Given the recent sadness at bk im not sure this is the right time for us to be talking about this.
Matt-YSBK is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:14
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dick. I completely agree. Funnelling traffic to a single point all at the same altitude as each other before a single call is made, is pure maddness. I'm not familiar with Camden, but that can't be much better....
CTOT340 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:14
  #39 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dick, they will all eventually end up mixing in the circuit, so therefore they really don't have any form of separation until they all hit that point. Surely having a point further out that is a point that will give the controllers a point to work out separation before mixing with everyone else at the final destination would be a better option. At least they are in a lesser dense traffic area and come under some form of control before proceeding into a higher traffic density area. Every one knows that reporting points are where we all start to mix it up and are aware that this is where we should become more vigilant. a far better option than doing over the highest density area of traffic on the whole trip in my opinion.
Would it not make more sense to call say 3 miles from the reporting point giving your position relative to it so as other pilots know where to look. Then perhaps again at the reporting point.
It works like that at Jandakot....... As I am unfamiliar with the actual area being discussed, I only assumed it was like that there.
A very simple procedure change with regards to radio calls would certainly improve the safety aspect.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 03:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Dick. I completely agree. Funnelling traffic to a single point all at the same altitude as each other before a single call is made, is pure maddness. I'm not familiar with Camden, but that can't be much better...."

Camden, at least, has 5 inbound points, and on top of that it's obviously less busy than BK to begin with.

"It works like that at Jandakot....... As I am unfamiliar with the actual area being discussed, I only assumed it was like that there.
A very simple procedure change with regards to radio calls would certainly improve the safety aspect."

Surprisingly not the case here in Sydney. But it sure should be.
brendanwor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.