Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

RAAF's Wedgetail project delayed further

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

RAAF's Wedgetail project delayed further

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2008, 02:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAAF's Wedgetail project delayed further

source AAP

The RAAF's new early-warning aircraft are behind schedule and even further delays are expected.

The $3.45 billion Wedgetail project is already running two years behind schedule with the latest delivery time still eight months away.

Even that schedule has the potential to blow out, parliamentary secretary Greg Combet said after his recent visit to Boeing's plant in the US.

Everyone was working to address problems with technical difficulties affecting the aircraft's radar, he said.

"This is a very advanced system and it is just taking a good deal of work."

Australia is buying six Boeing 737 airborne early warning and control aircraft, each equipped with an advanced radar able to watch over a 400 kilometres radius circle, directing fighters to any threat.

Under the original delivery schedule, the RAAF was to receive its first Wedgetails in November 2006.

Mr Combet has been specifically charged with improving troubled defence procurement practices.

Already the government has cancelled the $1 billion Seasprite helicopter project and a smaller project for unmanned drone aircraft.

But there have been successes also. This week two upgraded FFG (guided missiles) frigates - four years behind schedule - entered navy acceptance testing.

"That is huge breakthrough," Mr Combet said.

The message from the Seasprite cancellation was that problem procurements would not be allowed to fester and the axe would fall if need be, he said.

"That message is clearly through ... and the services understand that if things are going haywire, we are just not going to sit on it.

"We are not just going to keep pumping money into them."

The government will respond to a review of defence procurement practices early next year, including a key recommendation to separate defence materiel from the main organisation.

"We need to get reforms in place and make sure they are well understood in defence and industry," Mr Combet said.

wessex19 is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 03:20
  #2 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,523
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Pretty sure this has been mentioned before...but...what's with the "eyebrow" windows above the cockpit?
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 04:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,994
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Quite simple really, this 737 ( cn 33474/1245 ) was seen at Boeing Field prior to being fitted as a wedgetail on 16 Dec 2002.
It first flew as a wedgetail on May 20 2004 from Boeing Field.
A long time before Boeing stopped fitting the eye brow windows. They might plug them at a later date perhaps?


simple hey

Last edited by ACMS; 21st Nov 2008 at 04:32.
ACMS is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 06:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,299
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
the radar does not give a full 360 degree picture and has problems retaining targets in an orbit as the radar scanning is biaised against the forward and rear quadrants - see design shape. The aircraft has other problems in that the vertical stab needs a big change due to aero problems created by the radar 'hat'. another big issue is heat generated by the system - can't be run at full power! next problem is integrating civil 737 front end' with MilSpec back end. Hard to get them talking to each other...
It's another Sea Sprite....
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 15:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dog House
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like Boeing is as crap as Kaman. I'm surprised the DMO guys haven't reduced the scope or forced Air Force to accept the product as is. They are doing a good job of that with that aircrew currency/scheduling system (Flightpro by Ocean). Sometimes no matter how hard you try to polish a turd, it is still a turd. My opinion only of course.
.
ElPerro is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 00:19
  #6 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,523
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Thanks ACMS...I hadn't delved that deeply into the details.

So...another "new build" order like the Seasprites & Abrams eh? Bang for buck eh what?
Buster Hyman is online now  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 04:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This project does emit a certain odor,

But what are our options if we Seasprite it?

Is this delay also hitting the Turks?
Flyingblind is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 05:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,159
Received 93 Likes on 41 Posts
..and the Singaporians queitly celebrate 20 years of airborne early warning op's.

Singapore. The region's premiere air force. At half the cost of ours?
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 07:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Singapore. The region's premiere air force. At half the cost of ours?
That's because their government is able to make decisions without thousands of do-gooders and hangers on getting involved. They buy proven technology that will do the job best for their country and if anybody doesn't like it - tough!

As Kent Brockman once said: "When will people learn that democracy just does not work".
Cap'n Bunghole is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2008, 23:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,159
Received 93 Likes on 41 Posts
That's a cop-out blaming a democratic process.

Where's the leadership?

SIngapore air force rocks- proven American & Israeli technology.

It is incredible that they have operated radar planes for 20 years and are replacing their first generation with new Israeli gear.
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 02:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If wedgetail B737's had navy painted on the side it would be axed!!! does this mean I am paranoid??
wessex19 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 02:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Eden Valley
Posts: 2,159
Received 93 Likes on 41 Posts
The RAN's wastage is akin to standing on the corner of Bourke St continuously burning suitcases full of hundred dollar bills.

There has been a good economic cycle, budget surplus and a high AUD and Defence has squandered it.
Gnadenburg is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 06:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Without knowing the technical details of the Hawkeye it's impossable to make a comparason between its (proven) capabilities and the (projected) capabilities of the Wedgetail but i'm sure there's plenty in-the-know who would advocate one or the other.

From an outsiders point of view the RAAF are only now receiving platforms they should of had years ago and that the purchase of a Sqdron of Hawkeyes years ago would have provided Australia with a (limited) capability but years of experiance would have been gained from operating the capability, we would have been in a better position today.

Abrams is a succes story for the ADF, replace the old with a MOTS solution and get on with the job.

Like most taxpayers i'm fed up of reading about Government procuring golden bullet solutions when we simply don't have the funds to splah around.

About time certain persons in certain Government agencies and politicians were held accountable for their actions. As many others have said why do we need to re-invent the bloody wheel?

Look at how some of the other Defense agencies work around the world and emulate their strenghts.

I think it's not the fault of the generaly hardworking types that staff the agenices more a case of politcal mederling.
Flyingblind is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.