Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

A380 performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Oct 2008, 10:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 performance

Hi all!

Just wondering... how is the A380's high altitude performance? Is it a high flyer, like the old Ansett 762s often heard at FL390/FL410? Is it a slug- like a heavily laden 744 struggling to FL290? Just wonderin...

Any info would be appreciated....

Thanks!
roadie is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 11:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Antipodea
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should get a good answer a couple of days from now
FullySickBro is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 14:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not at work
Posts: 1,574
Received 88 Likes on 34 Posts
Hey Bro,

When's your first proper ride in the big girl?
Transition Layer is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 15:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Out West
Age: 69
Posts: 49
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Certified limit is 43100ft and MTOW is 569t.
From SIN to LHR (FTI 13:10) the other night at around TOW of 550t (if I remember correctly), we went straight to FL340 which, by the time we got there, was a few hundred feet below REC MAX. The plan had us initially at FL320 with a climb to 340 about 1:15 into the flight.
With the climb derate taken out, the climb rate was near 800 fpm for the last bit.
Got to FL400 in about the last three or so hours before LHR.
Givelda is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2008, 17:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is impressive Givelda.
Can I assume about 14T for the climb?
If so, at say 530 odd T what was your crz Mno at 340?
Ta
fire wall is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2008, 00:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Out West
Age: 69
Posts: 49
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Macn No at CRZ starts out at around .84 at TOC, drops back to around .835 when it's time for the next step climb.
However, somewhat dependant on the CI. The fleet started out at 130 but back a bit now. Supposed to be going to individual flight CI's soon, I believe.
As I recall, the FP gave 13t for the climb to FL320 plus 1.5t for taxi.
Overall, for the same sector, it seems to be easily capable of about 2 - 3000 ft higher than the 747 can do. At least that's the impression I have at the moment - only been on the thing for three months so I still have my "P" plates on at this stage!!!
Have another LHR in a few days, so will see what the numbers are then.
Givelda is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2008, 00:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,079
Received 151 Likes on 66 Posts
Yeah but what's the fuel burn compared to the 747-400 though?
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2008, 01:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Out West
Age: 69
Posts: 49
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Don't know if this helps Neville, but some raw numbers from a couple of old plans I have for SIN - SYD - without any numbers for the actual payload carried;
A380 burn-off = 85t (max possible pax load 470)
B744 burn-off = 73t (max possible pax load 375)

FTI for both flights was 6:45
Givelda is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.