Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

QF Seniority Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2008, 09:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF Seniority Question

Gday,

I was just wondering if any QF Pilots could give an insight into how command works at QF... ie Switching a/c types, SO - FO. Do you stay on the long haul fleet or do you go to domestic?

If you go to domestic, do you become a Capt for domestic, or do you go back to L/H to be a captain.

Sorry if I have confused... any replies would be appreciated.

lc_461
lc_461 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 13:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone joins as an S/O, from there what you do is entirely up to you, with the restriction that you must be a 2 engine F/O before being a 4 engine F/O, and you must be a 2 engine Captain before being a 4 engine Captain.
Every other scenario of movement is allowed, provided you have the seniority to make the move, and provided the move is 'up' the foodchain (which essentially means you must move to either a bigger aeroplane in the same rank, or up in rank).
HPSOV is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 16:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 209
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
What's Quantas?

Can't see that happening.
TruBlu351 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 19:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne,Vic. Australia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your mate is wrong. Perth basing for 737 ranks is being processed in the usual way. By seniority.
Cunning_Stunt is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 21:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australis
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So essentially a 744 S/O must make the transition to the A330, 738, or 767 for an upgrade to F/O?

Would seem a counter productive exercise in some respects.
carbon is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 21:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: bunkeronthe1st
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A380. How are things in Emarites?

The Perth base is being staffed with some Very Junior people. Your mate has been told by somebody, and I can assure you it was not Qantas, (maybe somebody in Qantas) that getting a Perth base is possible within a very short period of time. There is one guy who has been in QF for 7 months, and received a slot in Perth. However, you still join QF as a second officer. Tell your mate not to get his hopes up.
Fatguyinalittlecoat is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2008, 23:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380-800 might not be far off the mark. Apparently quite a few drivers withdrew from their s/h slot when given the opportunity during the eba negotiations. The remaining people with bids in don't have the required company experience(whatever that means!!!!) so the company is being left a fair number short of drivers for the Perth base which opens in a few months. Don't know if there will be D/E pilots for the base....i think they bought AN guys in on the 73 after the collapse, but they went back to S/O after everything caught up........mind you this is a rumour network and my sources aren't as reliable as the TN refueller!
KTM525 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 00:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently quite a few drivers withdrew from their s/h slot when given the opportunity during the eba negotiations. The remaining people with bids in don't have the required company experience.
If the required numbers are not achieved, the slots would be assigned in reverse seniority order to those which do hold the required company experience.

Last edited by Mstr Caution; 1st Oct 2008 at 05:12.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 02:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Brisvegas
Age: 46
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As mentioned above assigned in reverse seniority....
Tempo is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 02:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So essentially a 744 S/O must make the transition to the A330, 738, or 767 for an upgrade to F/O?

Would seem a counter productive exercise in some respects.
Correct, this policy must cost the company a lot of money in additional cross training (which they are trying to negate by imposing a limit on the number of moves you can make in a career, fortunately it got voted down by the members).
The companies argument is that 744 (and I guess now 380) drivers can do as few as 25 landings a year, and this would be insufficient to allow proper consolidation and development following promotional training. For someone who jonied the company with minimal experience, and then spent 5+ years and an S/O sitting in the jumpseat eating warm nuts and Patons chocolate macadamias then this is probably a fair call. For someone with previous jet time... ex-Ansett etc... it would seem a little silly.
HPSOV is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 02:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HPSOV, Is it true that Quantas is taking direct entry FOs to man their Perth base?
As others have stated this is presently not true. However should the situation arise that there are insufficient current pilots to fill vacancies then I'm sure the company would look at all available options, which would include new hires with suitable experience being sent straight to Perth as 737 f/o's. I cant see there being any problems with this, as they would have a seniority number on joining just like everyone else, and that seniority would then allow them to get a 73 slot in Perth immediately.
HPSOV is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 05:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont think the situation is that dire (within QF) that there will be any direct entry FO's onto the 737.

QF were prepared to assign the base in reverse order in the last round of promotions.

It took the collopse of a domestic competitor for it to happen last time......
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
A380 thingo,

Did it ever occur to you that on ultra long haul ops there simply are too few landings to keep the Capt and F/O current, let alone S/Os?

A sad fact of life.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 07:32
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
So you're suggesting that we have two captains and two FOs then like the yanks the captains only do about 12 landings a year??!!

Alternatively we could abolish flight and duty so we have no limits for two crew ops, there's another solution

I think the SO positions is the best of a bad choice.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 10:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: On the 15th floor
Age: 54
Posts: 379
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
I have to agree with A380 thingo that the SO positions are a disgrace. All people want is to 'grow' their career. We all want 'learning and development' and career progression (well, the ones that haven't given up anyway).

Many of my friends have resigned from QF in the last 18 months to take jobs with JQ on the bottom of the seniority list (having been in QF several years).

Yes, Qantas certainly is the poverty of expectations for anyone with a bit of experience.
kellykelpie is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 11:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KellyKelpie,

If your friends have been with Qantas for "several years".
Why would they resign to go to Jetstar for an F/O slot, they could have have one in mainline. As posted above, F/O slots went to crew who had only been in the company for 7 months.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 21:31
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 thingo,

Did it ever occur to you that on ultra long haul ops there simply are too few landings to keep the Capt and F/O current, let alone S/Os?

A sad fact of life.
Really, is 12 landings a year all a 744 Captain / FO get to do? Seriously?
lc_461 is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2008, 23:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: On the 15th floor
Age: 54
Posts: 379
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Master Caution - you assume they took FOs slots. Why is that?
kellykelpie is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 01:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because you hadn't stated otherwise.....
MC.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2008, 03:31
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: On the 15th floor
Age: 54
Posts: 379
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Well let me clarify. Their experience was recognised and valued - they joined as Captains.
kellykelpie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.