Cessna 162 Skycatcher Crashes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cessna 162 Skycatcher Crashes
This will be interesting!
Cessna Skycatcher
BUTLER COUNTY, Kansas, September 18, 2008 � A small plane has crashed in Butler Co.
Witnesses say they saw a man parachute from the experimental plane just east of Douglas, KS around 11:30 Thursday morning.
The man is expected to be OK.
The plane is the new Cessna Skycatcher, which is yet to be released.
KSN has a crew headed to the scene and will have updates as soon as they are available.
Federal investigators are on their way to Douglass, Kansas to investigate the crash of a Cessna Skycatcher LSA prototype Thursday. The pilot of the test aircraft was able to parachute to safety and was reportedly taken to hospital with minor injuries.
Cessna media relations personnel were unable to immediately respond to AVweb's request for more detailed information, but KAKE Television is reporting the aircraft crashed into a treeline near the boundary of Butler and Cowley Counties. The television station is quoting witnesses as saying they heard a loud pop and then saw sparks and the plane spiraling down. The pilot landed in a field about 400 yards from the aircraft. The TV station quoted a Cessna spokesman as saying the crash aircraft had about 150 hours on it.
The prototype first flew on March 8, and Cessna is planning on delivering the first customer aircraft in the first half of 2009. What the crash does to that schedule is unclear. There are close to 1,000 orders for the aircraft, which will be built in China and reassembled in three plants in the U.S.
Cessna Skycatcher
BUTLER COUNTY, Kansas, September 18, 2008 � A small plane has crashed in Butler Co.
Witnesses say they saw a man parachute from the experimental plane just east of Douglas, KS around 11:30 Thursday morning.
The man is expected to be OK.
The plane is the new Cessna Skycatcher, which is yet to be released.
KSN has a crew headed to the scene and will have updates as soon as they are available.
Federal investigators are on their way to Douglass, Kansas to investigate the crash of a Cessna Skycatcher LSA prototype Thursday. The pilot of the test aircraft was able to parachute to safety and was reportedly taken to hospital with minor injuries.Cessna media relations personnel were unable to immediately respond to AVweb's request for more detailed information, but KAKE Television is reporting the aircraft crashed into a treeline near the boundary of Butler and Cowley Counties. The television station is quoting witnesses as saying they heard a loud pop and then saw sparks and the plane spiraling down. The pilot landed in a field about 400 yards from the aircraft. The TV station quoted a Cessna spokesman as saying the crash aircraft had about 150 hours on it.
The prototype first flew on March 8, and Cessna is planning on delivering the first customer aircraft in the first half of 2009. What the crash does to that schedule is unclear. There are close to 1,000 orders for the aircraft, which will be built in China and reassembled in three plants in the U.S.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
who in their right mind would want to manuafacture a plane? especially a new type in this some times crazy litigatious (chk spelling)world & with the likes pf us PPRUNE'ers ready to shoot 'em down if they don't fall down themselves in the first place!
What engine powers this new bird?
CW
What engine powers this new bird?
CW
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok tnxs 'sle' for that link, I guess I could have searched myself but there's always someone in here that's up to date with all the lattest
The old O200, leart fly behind one of those reliable old donks!
Will be interested to see why the pilot jumped ship, sounds like the balistic chute option ought not to be just that, an option!
CW
The old O200, leart fly behind one of those reliable old donks!
Will be interested to see why the pilot jumped ship, sounds like the balistic chute option ought not to be just that, an option!
CW
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cessna GroundCatcher
There is talk elsewhere that it was up to spin testing in the test schedule. Not the first one to be lost. Even GA lost an Airvan in testing.
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Might have been in the student pilot mishandling stage of the test program.
Being a chinese aircraft, I think the procedure is to let go and close your eyes (so i am told by many instructors from CSFC) could be the American pilot lost something in the translation and bailed instead of closing eyes.
Being a chinese aircraft, I think the procedure is to let go and close your eyes (so i am told by many instructors from CSFC) could be the American pilot lost something in the translation and bailed instead of closing eyes.
Don Quixote Impersonator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ummmmmm er that's why Cessna and other manufacturers have a seriously testing test program. That's right,, to find out what the aircraft will do to those idiot punters who will one day buy it and, as they do, push the envelope, get hurt and then sue them.
So why are we surprised that in the search for an idiot proof aircraft they don't lose one or two.
So why are we surprised that in the search for an idiot proof aircraft they don't lose one or two.
Kudos to the test pilots of new aircraft I say! They have bigger you-know-whats than me thats for sure! I wouldn't like to go to work every day not knowing what the f
the aircraft is going to do in some circumstances- and having to purposely push it there until it breaks away!!
I know they have extensive computer modelling these days but imagine what it would have been like in the paper-era!
the aircraft is going to do in some circumstances- and having to purposely push it there until it breaks away!! I know they have extensive computer modelling these days but imagine what it would have been like in the paper-era!
The Airvan was going beyond what they needed for normal category. I wonder if the Cessna was also - it'd be more useful if it was approved for intentional spinning.
I've seen a number of aircraft go through a development program and end up with a bigger fin (inc ventrals etc) and/or rudder. The 150 got a bigger rudder at one stage too. Any bets on whether the 162 will get a bigger rudder?
I've seen a number of aircraft go through a development program and end up with a bigger fin (inc ventrals etc) and/or rudder. The 150 got a bigger rudder at one stage too. Any bets on whether the 162 will get a bigger rudder?
Cessna have lost a number of aircraft and pilots during the test flying stage. In the book Cessna Wings of the World, the author was a test pilot for Cessna and he talks about the loss of a Cessna C340 and the pilot.
Didn't Cessna lose a C441 during certification or just after certification with a tailplane failure. That resulted in the C441 being grounded for a while after the FAA pulled its certification.
Didn't Cessna lose a C441 during certification or just after certification with a tailplane failure. That resulted in the C441 being grounded for a while after the FAA pulled its certification.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gaunty
...in the search for an idiot proof aircraft...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting post Gaunty, reads like you think that they would expect to lose one which would surely not be the intention given the bad publicity and if it was being tested for spinning, it would normally have a spin-chute fitted.
Interesting the test pilot was 70 years old. Old and bold.
It would be interesting if the pilot of the Airvan that was lost could post on here to tell us what happened. The story that I heard was that CASA supposedly made them limit control movements, so much so, that exiting a spin became difficult.
HD, can you post something for us, we might learn something?
Interesting the test pilot was 70 years old. Old and bold.
It would be interesting if the pilot of the Airvan that was lost could post on here to tell us what happened. The story that I heard was that CASA supposedly made them limit control movements, so much so, that exiting a spin became difficult.
HD, can you post something for us, we might learn something?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Doesn't seem to be on the web anymore but there was an article (read sales pitch for the testing mob) about the airvan.
It suggested there was a spin chute deployed but the cable was too long and the a/c continued spinning.
With the C162 w/b or aerodynamics may be a factor in fitting a spin chute.
It suggested there was a spin chute deployed but the cable was too long and the a/c continued spinning.
With the C162 w/b or aerodynamics may be a factor in fitting a spin chute.
Last edited by Deaf; 20th Sep 2008 at 10:07.
I read somewhere that the airvan exited the spin after the pilot had jumped. 