Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Journalism or Churnalism?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 02:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Journalism or Churnalism?

Came across these articles this morning, which highlight the CHURNalism skills adopted by the media nowdays:

Article:
Jetstar stewardess pictured in flight seat | NEWS.com.au

Photos:
Crikey - Stewardess in the pilot's seat: Flying High on Jetstar - Stewardess in the pilot's seat: Flying High on Jetstar

Well done
Carambar is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 03:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I saw a pommy journo the other night on the 7.30Report being interviewed by Kerry Obrien (who I can't stand) and the topic was exactly that.

He claims that the ratio of Real investigative journo's to PR and marketing folk has swung to such an extreme that there is no time in a journo's day but to reprocess news from around the world and basically churn out rubbish.

Thats how we get so much incorrect reporting where facts are optional.... time permitting!

Of course this is not news to us on PPRUNE, as the boofheads who print stuff off here as "fact" have been easily sprung in the past!

Maybe they should print this thread.

Funny how when I have written to these idiots pointing out the errors of their ways, they never reply........ too busy copy 7 pasting the next big story!

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 03:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's almost as big as one of my Sunday afternoon runway beatups. No law has been broken if the pilot / fo was in the right seat and who's to say that anyone was even a passenger in the aircraft (not that it matters from a legal perspective).

Aside from Company Operational Procedures and the bad publicity, no harm done.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 03:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i don't think that they like to be called "stewardesses" anymore.
apache is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 04:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: neither here nor there
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i don't think that they like to be called "stewardesses" anymore.
So does that make "trolly dollys" acceptable again?
drunkensailor is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 05:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, What's with those stupid Kimono things that QF International wear. It's the most ugly non-flattering piece of material that anyone could wrap themselves in! If there was an emergency they would struggle to get out in one of those it's that bad. JetStar's uniform is much more practical in that sense.
VH-XXX is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.