Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Twin Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Aug 2008, 03:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cockatoo Australia
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Twin Question

Calling all you twin drivers. Can I get feedback and answers to this question, please.

Would you rather force-land a single or keep an asymmetric twin in the air and why?

Walrus
Walrus 7 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apartment
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
keep it in the air for aslong as possible, that way you've increased your chances of making to an aerodrome

that said, most piston twins when fully loaded up may struggle a bit and when you put IMC into the mix you then have to consider maintaining LSALT, MSAs etc and then shooting n approach on one puppy.

i really never want to face a situation where im in IMC, lose an engine, then slowly descend as i can't keep altitude, pop out below the clouds to see hostile terrain
Cessna Capt is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:14
  #3 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Id be in in the twin.
Unless a doctor was flying it.
tinpis is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NT
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definatly the twin. even if you cant maintain height, at least you will have more time!
NTremotepilot is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deep North
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's happened to me once, above a solid layer. 40 nm's north of destination at 7000, LSALT 5800. Mountainous terrain below. Had to shoot a VOR App to get down safely.

Bit of a pain, but if i'd been in a single...possibly game over with the cloud base below the higher mountain tops.

Dunno about anyone else, but if I was ever out and about in a piston single either at night or over water, I could always 'hear' things...bad things...and strange little vibrations...coming from the engine!!! Whoever said 'the aircraft doesn't know it's dark!'?
LUCKY-1 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: turn L @ Taupo, just past the Niagra Falls...
Posts: 596
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definitely the twin... with the proviso that you need to remember that for many GA twins, the 2nd engine is best considered a means of travel to the scene of the impending crash. Use the time it grants you to sort out a suitable landing site, then do so (land that is) as soon as possible. And if you absolutely gotta crash, keep flying it, as far into the crash as possible.
RadioSaigon is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 04:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The twin

Many a twin has flown safely to an aerodrome, or all the way home with one engine going. I did it twice.
bushy is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 07:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't need to call on Twin Drivers to tell you that it would be better in IMC to be on one engine versus none!
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 07:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 318 Likes on 118 Posts
Yes ya do, otherwise the Doc would be in on the answering too, and we all know what he'd say, .

Twin for sure. If you fly a twin engine aircraft properly assymetrically, there's no reason why you shouldn't be able to make it to your destination, even with a full load of pax.

EFATO, maybe not quite the same in the case of things like Chieftain's/Navajo's in hot climates, but it'll at least give you a fighting chance.

I always used to quite seriously believe that if I ever had an EFATO in a Chieftain, full of pax, it'd be safer to just pull the other engine and land it on a road or do a controlled crash, rather than having one engine at full power and descending into the tree's when you're trying to fight it.

morno
morno is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 07:52
  #10 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Id be in in the twin.
Unless a doctor was flying it.
I'd be in the twin unless it was a Seneca I, in which case I'd stay on the ground...

Last edited by Howard Hughes; 8th Aug 2008 at 08:35.
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 08:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: E116
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gimme a turbine twin anyday!
BrazDriver is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 08:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: your house
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
poor old sheeftan's

I've got just on 400 hours in Chieftan's and from what I've seen of their performance, I can tell you there's no way the old girl would even maintain height with a fair payload on board. It would make for an interesting situation if you threw in IMC below LSALT.. I guess the answer to the original question is that it depends on flight conditions and payload.
senshi is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 09:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying is always preferable, even if only on 1 engine as you are in control and it bys you time to come up with a plan.

The old forced landing is as the name suggests forced, you have no other options.
Gundog01 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 10:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where's Wally these days....... he would have an answer!

J
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 10:55
  #15 (permalink)  
BAY
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bay
Age: 49
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One feels safe in C208 Caravan when IMC at night, Safer than an OLD twin with a **** auto pilot and No or worthless DeIce gear and Wx radar, Old Instruments and buttons and knobs all over the place after 30 years of mods, Then you never know how the last guy treated the Old piston Engines, at least most single turbines have a computer that records the engine life..
Caravan
Twin turbine
BAY is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 11:12
  #16 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes Jabba, where is Wally? Are they working him too hard down there...
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 11:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Look up and wave
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seen the latest flight safety mag Bay? lots of 208's with engine failures! (not many piston twins in there)

Yeah the van might be a nice bit of kit, BUT you might aswell wipe your rear end with the pages from the logbook as the entrys are right below your 152!

The ole GA piston twins have always got me home and they will do so for the next fellas flying them after me for many years (and i stress years again) to come!

EDIT:

Ah yeah back on topic, piston twin pre take off brief, below blue line i will close the thottles and land ahead, above blue line (drills) asses performance and etc

The moral of the story of these aeroplanes is to know the limitations, the second engine is there to give you more options than you would have in a single, once you have learnt the realistic expectations of your aeroplane you can make a plan and act on it! that is what we are paid to do

Last edited by MACH082; 8th Aug 2008 at 11:48.
MACH082 is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 11:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Outer Marker hut
Posts: 229
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
It depends on whether you are a poor enough pilot/decision maker to "will" the old thing to stay airborne so long that you do the Vmca flip or not, sometimes chioce can make you do stooopid things.

Better to go in upright and on your own terms than purely on Issac Newtons.
bazza stub is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 11:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ...outside the wall...
Age: 68
Posts: 170
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Couln't agree with bazza stub more. Have watched two people die in a Comanche doing the Vmca flip instead of closing the throttles and turning it into a glider. Very sobering!

Bottom line in a twin; thorough pre-take off brief every time with an appropriate escape plan (including the thought process of turning it into a glider if necessary and doing a forced landing)and the discipline to execute it.
ravan is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2008, 11:56
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes ya do, otherwise the Doc would be in on the answering too, and we all know what he'd say,
You do?

Its a stupid question!

Of course your gonna say your better off with two engines, if you loose one - cause we are all ****-hot pilots that can handle it!

Then again, you have twice the chance of finding out just how ****-hot you are by flying a twin.

Now if the question was "Would you rather ride a Baron or a Bo to the ground - gimme the Bonza any day!

Dr

PS: Did I tell you? Its BACK IN THE F*CKING AIR! I have racked up 20+hrs in the last week.
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.