Jetstar A321 no good.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: warmth
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jetstar A321 no good.
Anyone got the news that the new A321 (sorry, secondhand) failed the interest of any LAME to get signed-off.
Apparently it was a really bad example of an A321.
So now its a toss-up whether its going back...
anyone??????
Apparently it was a really bad example of an A321.
So now its a toss-up whether its going back...
anyone??????
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Did I read recently thata GOD had canned the whole 321 along with other stuff because of fuel prices and rescaling operations to suit the market.......................now it would not be like him to stretch the truth would it?
J
J
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Up left - Down right
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just another cover up of poor management decisions to buy cheap clapped out airframes.
Remember the second hand 744GE's OEB OEC OED. How bad were they especially the ones with the "sunroof" in E zone.
I won't even mention that off shore maintenance caused it (Didn't Qantas just start a joint adventure with that mob?)
They cost a packet to get working properly.
Same with the A321 but they are beyond help.
Better still, blame fuel price and wages to hide the blunder.
Remember the second hand 744GE's OEB OEC OED. How bad were they especially the ones with the "sunroof" in E zone.
I won't even mention that off shore maintenance caused it (Didn't Qantas just start a joint adventure with that mob?)
They cost a packet to get working properly.
Same with the A321 but they are beyond help.
Better still, blame fuel price and wages to hide the blunder.
