Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: Disabled Aircraft YSSY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2008, 08:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
Merged: Disabled Aircraft YSSY

Just checking the TAF/TTF for YSSY and ATIS is showing RWY 34R not available due disabled aircraft.

Last edited by tail wheel; 13th May 2008 at 13:17. Reason: Merged Threads
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 10:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: YBBN
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATIS YSSY E 130934
APCH: EXP VISUAL APCH
RWY: 34L
OPR INFO: PARL RWY OPS IN PROG.
INDEPENDENT DEPARTURES IN PROG.
RWY 34R NOT AVBL DUE DISABLED ACFT
CONTACT 127.6 FOR START CLEARANCE
It seems so! What is it now?
PyroTek is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 10:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hades
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF805 to CBR 737 dep. 17.55 rejected take off. Tyres blown and a/c disabled on runway. Passengers taken off by stairs and returned to domestic terminal. No injuries.
thelummox is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 11:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 33
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Qantas flight from Sydney to Canberra has been aborted after the plane blew two tyres during take-off.
Qantas said flight QF805 was aborted at 6pm (AEST) on Tuesday as it began to take off from Sydney Airport.
All 92 passengers on board the 737 were booked on other flights leaving for Canberra.
"The (Qantas) flight crew acted in accordance with their training," a Qantas spokeswoman said.
"The incident has been referred to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau."
Bit bigger than a baron this time round.
DH 200' is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 12:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a/c disabled 34R

Anyone know what happened to the aircraft disabled on 34R tonight? (at sydney, of course, "centre of the universe")
handbagwitheyes is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 12:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stuck in the middle...
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As this is actual news involving a RPT a/c, should it not be in D&G Reporting Points and not D&G Q/GA?

Mods?
Taildragger67 is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 15:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: YBBN
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taildragger, You seem to have forgotten that OP asked a question!
PyroTek is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 20:48
  #8 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Geez, you'd have to be damned unlucky to blow two tyres during take-off. I wonder if the blown tyre thronmiester let them know?

But then, with two blown tyres, then a rejected take-off, I guess they were even luckier not to blow the other 4!
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 21:43
  #9 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking Not only has QF ordered the 747-8 but it appears that they have them in service!

Lol. Saw this in todays Australian.


A QANTAS jet blew two of its tyres during take-off yesterday, less than two months after a similar incident involving a Qantas jet in Los Angeles.

The 747-800 jet's flight from Sydney to Canberra was aborted after the tyres blew as it began take-off about 6pm.

Qantas said pilots followed safety procedures and the 92 passengers on board flight QF805 were rebooked on other flights to Canberra last night. "The flight crew acted in accordance with their training," a Qantas spokeswoman said.

The incident has been referred to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

A Qantas 747-400 carrying 217 passengers blew three of its tyres during take-off on a Los Angeles to Sydney flight on March 26.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said a three-tyre blowout was a "consequence of a fully loaded aircraft".

A third Qantas 747 blew its tyres on take-off on a Frankfurt-bound flight from Singapore Airport on March 8, 2006. German and Australian authorities concluded there was no safety concern warranting major investigation.

In January, Qantas began a check of its 747 fleet after a mid-air electrical failure forced a plane flying to London to land in Bangkok using battery back-up power.
Yes. A real problem with that 747 fleet!
Keg is offline  
Old 13th May 2008, 21:51
  #10 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Oh...Singapore tyres?
tinpis is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 06:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,483
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said a three-tyre blowout was a "consequence of a fully loaded aircraft".
Oh for the love of...

Note to Journalists: If you're going to quote someone who actually knows what they're talking about, print the whole darn quote! If you cut it in half, you will change the meaning!
Lasiorhinus is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 08:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 65
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I think i do know what happened...
It was the FO's first take off with a heavy duty brass button clutch which he released just a tad too quick resulting the massive wheelspin that lasted 1000 meters before the captain put his foot on the clutch but unable to prevent blowing the tyres and called it the day.
sms777 is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 09:47
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With 92 passengers? 92 passengers on a 737 is never close to full the last time I checked.

Journalists never let facts get in the way of a good story
Qantas 787 is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 11:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On a Ship Near You
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
92 PAX is a long way from full, however, that beast was next stop Perth, so was it loaded to the gunnels with fuel to avoid the costly fuel pick-up at CB?

It may have been very close to MTOW when rolling.

But I'm only adding to the speculation, I know not!

The OZ online site has that story edited now for the right type.
SM4 Pirate is offline  
Old 14th May 2008, 11:12
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
Was it the front tyres or back tyres?
Is the traction control in a B737 a 10 day MEL item still?
Stationair8 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.