Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Eagle interviewing students...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th May 2008, 01:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: House
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Even after the nephew story, I'm still not completely convinced - and no sour grapes nor jealousy here - that this is now the new norm.

Kinda sounds like a pilot scheme (no pun) as, as was mentioned, there would appear to be other recruitment options still about.



SkySurfin....

Completely agree with the need for an autopilot.

Not saying it needs to be used from take-off to touch down in a horsefloat, but is def nice to have if things get busy.
nike is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2008, 08:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Live in Taupiri, Waikato, work in the big smoke, New Zealand
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard today that the 2 CTC students are now on their sim courses in Canada and that Eagle had signed some sort of "pilot supply" agreement with CTC last week...completely unsubstantiated of course...but came from a current CTC student visiting the tower today.

Last edited by slackie; 29th Jul 2008 at 08:22. Reason: speling!?
slackie is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2008, 12:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the two students on the NZ version of the CTC course going straight from training into Eagle Air is currently going to be the exception rather than the norm. I know that CTC are working hard with Air NZ to try and get some sort of arrangement going though so this may well be some sort of pilot scheme (sorry, no pun intended) or trial run as it were but I don't think that all NZ cadets from CTC are going to go straight into Eagle. My understanding is that the two cadets going to Eagle are the first two cadets through the NZ scheme.

One rumour I have heard (and it is just rumour) is that cadets will do their training with CTC, spend a while instructing (with CTC) once they've finished, and then move on to Eagle. I think this is a much better idea than sending cadets straight to Eagle as it gives them more experience and also gives CTC a constant supply of instructors.

What ever happens though, you've got to admit it is good publicity for CTC (since they've now placed 100% of their NZ cadets who have finished - all two of them - directly with the airlines) and also it is potentially good for future pilots as it provides a little more surety in their career path. (I guess what I am trying to say is that it is interesting looking at the differences in the aviation industry and how to make your way into it in NZ compared to Europe.)
flightless_bird is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2008, 21:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No you dont and by the sound of it the 1900 is not a bad a/c to fly but when you take a little baby with 200 hrs and put them in the rhs the holes in the cheese model start to line up almost immediately. Have you heard of the cfit risk assessment ? Two thoughts, cat b app at night to minima, circ into terrain ie WRE (shortest airport in the air nz network), raining with a 25 kt xwind, no autopilot PLUS a 200 hr f/o.
Then lob in an engine failure or such...

Sure they do it in 737's etc in europe but they basicly only have to monitor them if they are flying the app, which would be done on the a/p anyway so really no comparison eh??

Plus the peope at Eagle (captains) dont get paid enough to do that shyt, and they are not all taining captains.
You must remember too that Eagle would have to change their training to suit the newbes as the current program would have them in crying after a few days or so. Plus they still have to pass the check to line, which even 1000+ hr guys are having trouble with, or is that them being a bit unrealistic ?

Anyhow,I think it would be slightly easier in the q-300 than the 1900 due to the time available to manage them with the a/p on, also the captains are maybe of higher time.
always inverted is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2008, 21:10
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: back to the land of small pay and big bills
Age: 50
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was in the Eag maintenance base the other day and the Gingerbeers said they had to take one Beech out of the system every day for dedicated training and at the height of the hiring boom, they really needed two...they couldn't get the overnight Aircraft for the schedualed maintenance because it was needed to do pilot checks.


Is it not time to get a Sim? Wouldn't Eagle have made their money back ten times by now if they had one from the start?

Always Inverted..that sounds like the METAR for Whangarei last night! Still enjoying the far north?
mattyj is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2008, 21:39
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could use Vincent's 1900 ....
Steve Zissou is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.