Perth out of control...
Another Runway 06 Only Day
This Tuesday morning saw Perth Airport operations on RWY 06 due to strong easterlies and excessive crosswind on RWY 03 again.
Based on the experience of the day that caused this thread to start, Perth Tower reduced the number of available slots for departure from 32 to 26 per hour. (For "RWY 06 only" operations)
This meant that the whole morning departure "push" lasted about 20 mins longer than usual and many aircraft were significantly delayed passed their preferred taxy time.
However times for commencement of taxy to departure averaged 10 mins with a 17 min peak.
Instead of having 16 aeroplanes at the holding point and taxiways burning fuel going nowhere, we had a maximum of 8, which was manageable but provided enough airframes to maintain a steady departure flow.
Tomorrow morning looks like another 06 only day, so we will be using the "formula" again to test its validity.
Based on the experience of the day that caused this thread to start, Perth Tower reduced the number of available slots for departure from 32 to 26 per hour. (For "RWY 06 only" operations)
This meant that the whole morning departure "push" lasted about 20 mins longer than usual and many aircraft were significantly delayed passed their preferred taxy time.
However times for commencement of taxy to departure averaged 10 mins with a 17 min peak.
Instead of having 16 aeroplanes at the holding point and taxiways burning fuel going nowhere, we had a maximum of 8, which was manageable but provided enough airframes to maintain a steady departure flow.
Tomorrow morning looks like another 06 only day, so we will be using the "formula" again to test its validity.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PH 298/7.4DME
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yah,
It all seemed to work a bit better on Tuesday. Good work to the crew organising that!
Was the amount of traffic comparable to a few Tuesdays ago when we waited 42mins?
520
Was the amount of traffic comparable to a few Tuesdays ago when we waited 42mins?
520
About the same numbers
This Tuesday morning's push numbered 58, woulda been more but 2-3 cancelled. "Black" Tuesday was 59 from memory.
Please be aware however that its not a precise "science" every day is different, route mix, aircraft type mix and the order they "present" all are a factor in how smoothly or otherwise it goes.
Other things that help are:
Please be aware however that its not a precise "science" every day is different, route mix, aircraft type mix and the order they "present" all are a factor in how smoothly or otherwise it goes.
Other things that help are:
- advise as early as possible if you cant make your slot... we will try and assign it to another aircraft
- if you haven't got the slot you want, listen out after being assigned your clearance and slot and we will call you if an earlier one becomes available due a u/s whatever
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AUS
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Similar SIDS
CAC_sabre
If sequencing 6 aircraft is difficult on the same SID why not give then the Radar Deprture and use that to fix the problem?
Whilst they are all heading in roughly the same direction, they aren't all going to the same spot, so once clear of the crossing tracks and with GPS seperation standards it would be direct to wherever?
After all does ATC asks QF, VB etc not to fly SY - ML at the same time?
If sequencing 6 aircraft is difficult on the same SID why not give then the Radar Deprture and use that to fix the problem?
Whilst they are all heading in roughly the same direction, they aren't all going to the same spot, so once clear of the crossing tracks and with GPS seperation standards it would be direct to wherever?
After all does ATC asks QF, VB etc not to fly SY - ML at the same time?
Yo Jetpipe
If sequencing 6 aircraft is difficult on the same SID why not give then the Radar Departure and use that to fix the problem?
I expect this is the primary reason for the Radar Departure not being used more often, maybe the TCU guys could provide more insight into the issue.
Last edited by cac_sabre; 14th Feb 2008 at 10:50. Reason: quote mark editing, I'll get it right one day!
Perth Ground, morning, 08/07/08
Ok, what was the spanner thrown in the works this morning? Jeeze I'm glad I'm not in air traffic control, hats off to the lady who was on 121.7 this morning...better you than me!
We ended up having a laugh about it, no harm done, etc etc and ask only as we had never heard it so congested, it was bad even for a Tuesday.
We ended up having a laugh about it, no harm done, etc etc and ask only as we had never heard it so congested, it was bad even for a Tuesday.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
speaking of which whatever happened to spanna haven't heard her on the radio in a while she quit or get shipped off somewhere else? I say bring her back we need something to brighten up our mornings.......
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In creating the “system” it was calculated that given the enroute restrictions, the maximum achievable departure rate was 30 per hour. We created 32 slots per hour adding the extra two to make sure the ATC system was always under “pressure”
As I was reading this I was guessing that maybe 25/hour would be about the limit, if things were well organised - then read further down and found that was indeed the case.
Rather than experimenting, why not get someone who knows queuing theory to do the maths? It is a pretty well studied and understood area. An expert should be able to look at the stats and give you charts showing slots vs. utilization vs. average wait time. They can even show you the differences in wait time with designated slots, clustered arrivals or random arrivals.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like a doctors surgery taking bookings. 10 min per patient = 7 patients per hour?? And i get annoyed waiting for 7 mile ILS traffic to land at TVL. Cant say i miss Perth.
I thought infinity was a big number
If we allocated 25 slots per hour on most mornings we would unnecessarily delay between 3 and 6 flights.
When aeroplanes are servicable, self loading freight has turned up on time, aircraft taxy on time and in a good order, we can punch out 32 per hour. We do reduce the slots available when we are reduced to single runway ops or when weather precludes the use of tower visual separation for departures.
I am enough of a mathematician to be fairly confident that say by having 2 too many slots allocated per hour that in the 2 hour long departure rush, the overflow in the queue will not even come close to infinity... more like 4
The same technique is used in Sydney for the management of CTMS based arrival slots eg in a particular runway configuration and cloud base the achievable acceptance rate is "X" but X plus 2 slots are made available, once again to ensure a slot does not go unfilled.
Anyone have a better management strategy I'd be glad to hear it
When aeroplanes are servicable, self loading freight has turned up on time, aircraft taxy on time and in a good order, we can punch out 32 per hour. We do reduce the slots available when we are reduced to single runway ops or when weather precludes the use of tower visual separation for departures.
I am enough of a mathematician to be fairly confident that say by having 2 too many slots allocated per hour that in the 2 hour long departure rush, the overflow in the queue will not even come close to infinity... more like 4
The same technique is used in Sydney for the management of CTMS based arrival slots eg in a particular runway configuration and cloud base the achievable acceptance rate is "X" but X plus 2 slots are made available, once again to ensure a slot does not go unfilled.
Anyone have a better management strategy I'd be glad to hear it
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought infinity was a big number
I am enough of a mathematician to be fairly confident that say by having 2 too many slots allocated per hour that in the 2 hour long departure rush, the overflow in the queue will not even come close to infinity... more like 4
Queue maths is complicated enough that I can't actually remember how to do the equations. I do remember the principles e.g. the general relationship between arrival rate, service rate and wait time. It can also account for the fact that aeroplanes aren't always serviceable, self loading freight don't always turn up on time, and aircraft don't always taxy on time and in good order.
If we allocated 25 slots per hour on most mornings we would unnecessarily delay between 3 and 6 flights.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: YLIL on my days off
Age: 50
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Google "Erlang".
The principles were developed for call traffic in telecommunications but the same principles apply to ATC - i.e. volume per hour, wait expectations, blocking (clearance not available), etc.
Service levels (i.e. X% of target within Y seconds/minutes) do not fail in a linear fashion, they fall off a cliff. For example you could be happily meeting a service level and then one little delay will cause a complete cluster fluck as it pushes the math over the edge.
Actually thinking about this - does anyone have traffic arrival data for ATC at Perth (not just volumes but actual times and the time from contact to clear of rwy if it exists). I'm going to run a little simulation and apply some of the optimisation algorithims we use here and see what it tells us.
The principles were developed for call traffic in telecommunications but the same principles apply to ATC - i.e. volume per hour, wait expectations, blocking (clearance not available), etc.
Service levels (i.e. X% of target within Y seconds/minutes) do not fail in a linear fashion, they fall off a cliff. For example you could be happily meeting a service level and then one little delay will cause a complete cluster fluck as it pushes the math over the edge.
Actually thinking about this - does anyone have traffic arrival data for ATC at Perth (not just volumes but actual times and the time from contact to clear of rwy if it exists). I'm going to run a little simulation and apply some of the optimisation algorithims we use here and see what it tells us.
Last edited by flog; 8th Feb 2009 at 23:03. Reason: Added the bit about getting data from Perth and running a simulation and optimisation.