Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: Qantas Cadets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Feb 2008, 08:35
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DLX.........and if you don't mind sharing

what's your age

when did you apply
21391401 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 04:01
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey, I submitted my application mid Nov got the invite. 15th JAn. was offered
22nd 29th and 1st of feb.
also 22. About to complete my CPL Theory is done. Failed the Flight test twice.
and how about yourself?

i also applied previously 2 other times. didn't meet the deadline for the autumn program. , and wasnt competitive enough for the 2007 level 1. (was already untertaking training)
dlx_xlb is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 10:17
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thx mate ... am 31, finished CPL about 8 months ago, working in a different industry, submitted about same time as you & nothing so far so I thk they have KB'd me, never applied before ..... good luck with your application
21391401 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 11:35
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got every thing else thats required?
like your NVFR with 5 hours command at night?

Good luck with your application aswell.
dlx_xlb is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 12:01
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thought i had til you mentioned that - i have nvfr, nil command time, where does it say night command time reqd?

& thx
21391401 is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 22:17
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 34
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought a requirement of attaining the nvfr was that you did 5 hrs command time. it need only be in the circuit
cessna_dave is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2008, 22:20
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 44
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Negative, the 5hrs at night are required only for your instrument rating.
Altimeters is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 00:19
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Altimeters,

I'm not sure whether it's a requirement for anything else but it is for the Commercial program. I got the call up for autumn about 10 days ago and she asked me to make sure that I had 5 hours in command at night. Hence, I think it's not so much a pre-requisite as it is something you have to do before you start training... if that makes sense!
cudza101 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 01:44
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here you go:
Are there any additional requirements I should be aware of if applying to the Commercial Program?

If offered a position on the Cadet Pilot Training Program it is a requirement that Commercial Program Cadets will have completed 5 hours Pilot in Command (PIC) at night prior to the commencement of training. You may wish to consider this when undertaking your Night Visual Flight Rules training.
dlx_xlb is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 02:16
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's somewhat ambiguous but my reading is that the phrase "if offered a position" means that the 5 hours night PIC is a prerequisite for the training and not a prerequisite for applying... if that makes sense!

There was no stage within the recruitment process itself where they could ascertain whether you satisfied the requirment. They ask for the last three pages of your logbook but that wouldn't be conclusive if you'd done the time a year ago.
cudza101 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 02:27
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah I agree.
dlx_xlb is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 09:22
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys,

noticed a few of you saying you are going for the commercial cadets route.

I applied and was called about it, asked if i had to pay any training money and I was no longer interested after I heard you still have to fork out 42,000$ relocate to adelaide for training / re sit atpl's. Regardless of already holding a CPL ME/ IR / ATPL!

I weighed up my options are it would be cheaper to buy the hours and apply as direct entry with 500hrs! lol!

Did you guys know and are prepared to do this? seems crazy to me.

50k debt is enough for me!


Steve - o
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2008, 10:36
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ksa5223,

When you say that you applied for the commercial program and were 'called about it' are you implying that you're application was successful or did you have this discussion much earlier in the process? The reason I ask is that I'm surprised that you would expend any energy on the process without knowing what the deal is so-to-speak.

More generally, I get the general gist of what you're saying - and it is true to say that you can fly your way from CPL to 500TT in less that $42,000. Nonetheless, I have have to agree with FP_Ace in that a) it is very unusual for a CPL to build hours without getting a job; and b) that, even in today's environment, the bare minimums are unlikely to get you in via direct entry.

From what I've gathered anecdotally and through the recruitment process, the mainline cadetships are popular not because they are cheap or cost effective but because they effectively guarantee you a place within the group and, perhaps more importantly, save you the trouble of going through the recruitment process further down the track. I guess it really comes down to when/where you want to join the rat race.
cudza101 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2008, 07:42
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FP_ACE
That's because it is intended for bare cpl holder's and not fully qualfied Pilots.Otherwise it would just defeat the purpose of direct entry...And please don't tell me you're really thinking about buying your self to 500TT?Not that you would stand a small chance of getting in with those times anyway.

FP
Hey, it was a joke and I was simply showing the comparison of how expensive it is.
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2008, 07:51
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: VXXX
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cuzda101
ksa5223,
From what I've gathered anecdotally and through the recruitment process, the mainline cadetships are popular not because they are cheap or cost effective but because they effectively guarantee you a place within the group and, perhaps more importantly, save you the trouble of going through the recruitment process further down the track. I guess it really comes down to when/where you want to join the rat race.
Thats fair enough, in my situation it was more like do I have another spare 42k. Thats a no! 50k debt is enough atm...

I'll have to give the Qlink Traineeships a try.
ksa5223 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2008, 08:26
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 395
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Oh what to do?

Have to agree with KSA

Have just been offered stage 2 invite for cadets but am now rethinking due to the 42k expense and now with Qantaslink traineeship. The bugger is in still not hearing from QL yet in order to make a better decision. Any suggestions? ie. Hold out for the QL traineeship or go for the cadetship stage 2?
HappyBandit is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2008, 10:52
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A rejection of the mainline cadetship after Stage 2 certainly makes more sense if you throw the QL traineeship into the equation but I think the principles remain the same - that is, the difference between the mainline cadetship and any other cadetship is that it offers you theoretical progression into mainline once you've done your training and your Industry Placement (coincidentally with QL).

In other words, doing the QL traineeship - on my reading - will leave you at the same stage as other QL Pilots who complain about the lack of progression to mainline.
cudza101 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 06:47
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 49
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Interview this week

G'day 21391401,

Sorry for taking so long to reply. I have the interview, oha and skills test this week. Still been trying to get my NVFR! I've got one more consolidation flight, and then the test. All I need is 2 more nights of flying, but with this weather, it's still cutting it fine.

I've got 2.1 command, so I should be able to get some circuits in to finish the rest.

Talk soon, and I'll let you know how I go.

Nadsy.
Nadsy is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 20:58
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: everywhere
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nadsy good luck with all of it, sounds like a busy week ...... I finally got the call up for testing, due in a couple of weeks
21391401 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2008, 04:54
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
21391401 whens your testing?
Says in the selection schedule stage 2 up to 15th Feb, but it looks like thier going to extend it.
dlx_xlb is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.