Parallel Entry (Sector 1) Question
"Who would have thought parallel entries could have provoked such conversation!"
I would!
This is the forum with:
a 4 or 5 page discussion on how to start a PA28 !!! .... and,
a 7 page discussion on how to land a C182 !!!
etc, etc, etc
Dr
I would!
This is the forum with:
a 4 or 5 page discussion on how to start a PA28 !!! .... and,
a 7 page discussion on how to land a C182 !!!
etc, etc, etc
Dr
Now...how long is a piece of string? Anyone?
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'm absolutely staggered that you people are talking about a basic holding pattern entry procedure..there is parallel, offset, and direct, each being quite a set procedure. If you guys/gals don't know the difference...then you ought not to be flying, let alone passed a flight test......absolutely staggered.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nup. Enter the hold via the sector entry at the holding altitude. There is no requirement to enter at the MSA.
Tee Emm, I never advocated descending below the LSALT/MSA.
Nup. Enter the hold via the sector entry at the holding altitude. There is no requirement to enter at the MSA.
PPRuNeaholic
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From a procedure designer's viewpoint, a Pans Ops procedure provides massive holding pattern protection that is, in part, intended to allow for sector entries. Therefore, so long as you've passed the fix on which the pattern is predicated, you CAN commence descent to the lowest holding altitude, if you wish. You can therefore continue descent, as and if necessary, to reach lowest holding altitude DURING the sector entry.
I don't know what's actually being taught, but that's the REAL situation... from a Pans Ops procedure designer's perspective.
I don't know what's actually being taught, but that's the REAL situation... from a Pans Ops procedure designer's perspective.