Avidyne Entigra or Garmin G1000....which is better
Avidyne Entigra or Garmin G1000....which is better
Would love to hear from anyone who has flown with both. Cessna, Beech, Mooney, Columbia have all gone the Garmin route, while Cirrus has stayed with the Avidyne setup.
How does the Avidyne Entegra compare with the G1000.
Has Cirrus made a mistage by not going to the Garmin 1000. is garmin in danger of being run out of the business. have heared of talk of a generation 2 Entigra integrated cockpit to match the G1000 comming out soon but no sign of it yet.
How does the Avidyne Entegra compare with the G1000.
Has Cirrus made a mistage by not going to the Garmin 1000. is garmin in danger of being run out of the business. have heared of talk of a generation 2 Entigra integrated cockpit to match the G1000 comming out soon but no sign of it yet.
Haven't flown with either, but
Hoover = vacuum cleaner
VHS = video tape format
Garmin = GPS
I just love my Garmin GPSMap296 and GNS430 !
Lokking forward to having a go at a G1000.
Dr
Hoover = vacuum cleaner
VHS = video tape format
Garmin = GPS
I just love my Garmin GPSMap296 and GNS430 !
Lokking forward to having a go at a G1000.
Dr
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NMC:
Found This while looking into the Cirrus. Looks like Cirrus Jumped on the right horse when it comes to ease of use and Pilot situational awareness.
Cessna, Beech, Mooney and Columbia's decision to select the G1000 may have had more to do with $$ incentives rather than which is actually the better system for their customer - The Pilot.
----------------------------------------------------------
AVIDYNE ENTEGRA TOPS GARMIN G1000
IN INDEPENDENT HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
The Aviation Consumer Magazine Calls Entegra “Our Top Pick”
Citing Ease-of-Use, More Mature Software
LINCOLN, Mass . – March 23, 2006 -- Avidyne Corporation announced today that The Aviation Consumer magazine, in an independent, in-depth comparison with the Garmin G1000, chose the Avidyne Entegra integrated flight deck as its “top pick” because of its ease-of-use, intuitive and logically arranged displays and more mature software that integrates well with other avionics.
“A glass cockpit is all about real-time, everyday operability, not a miles-deep feature set that you may never use. In that regard, when it comes to flying from here to there under the guidance of glass, the Entegra is simply easier to use,” the review stated in the March 2006 issue. “But if you’re flying a piston single after a long day at your real job, that simplicity can make a world of difference in comfort and confidence.”
“Given the complexity of the G1000, we think it’s more likely to give a rusty pilot heartburn than the Entegra will,” the review stated.
The review said Avidyne’s “mature software yields excellent integration with other avionics, including traffic, XM weather and radar.” It also said the Entegra’s primary flight display (PFD) and multifunction display (MFD) “are more logically customizable with elements grouped in ways we found appealing.”
The review cited advantages of key Entegra features including:
An altitude bug selectable to within 10 feet vs. 100 feet in the G1000 for accurate altitude capture on climbs, descents and on instrument approaches;
Simpler and familiar operation of navcom radios;
Logical grouping of winds aloft, temperature and wind vector data near the HSI for prompt wind corrections;
Intuitive display of engine data near the PFD’s airspeed readout for precise power-pitch adjustments;
An additional CDI display at the bottom of the attitude indicator for a tighter instrument scan on final approach, and;
Graphical METARs, AIRMETs and other weather display on the main map page for quick assessment of current conditions.
Found This while looking into the Cirrus. Looks like Cirrus Jumped on the right horse when it comes to ease of use and Pilot situational awareness.
Cessna, Beech, Mooney and Columbia's decision to select the G1000 may have had more to do with $$ incentives rather than which is actually the better system for their customer - The Pilot.
----------------------------------------------------------
AVIDYNE ENTEGRA TOPS GARMIN G1000
IN INDEPENDENT HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
The Aviation Consumer Magazine Calls Entegra “Our Top Pick”
Citing Ease-of-Use, More Mature Software
LINCOLN, Mass . – March 23, 2006 -- Avidyne Corporation announced today that The Aviation Consumer magazine, in an independent, in-depth comparison with the Garmin G1000, chose the Avidyne Entegra integrated flight deck as its “top pick” because of its ease-of-use, intuitive and logically arranged displays and more mature software that integrates well with other avionics.
“A glass cockpit is all about real-time, everyday operability, not a miles-deep feature set that you may never use. In that regard, when it comes to flying from here to there under the guidance of glass, the Entegra is simply easier to use,” the review stated in the March 2006 issue. “But if you’re flying a piston single after a long day at your real job, that simplicity can make a world of difference in comfort and confidence.”
“Given the complexity of the G1000, we think it’s more likely to give a rusty pilot heartburn than the Entegra will,” the review stated.
The review said Avidyne’s “mature software yields excellent integration with other avionics, including traffic, XM weather and radar.” It also said the Entegra’s primary flight display (PFD) and multifunction display (MFD) “are more logically customizable with elements grouped in ways we found appealing.”
The review cited advantages of key Entegra features including:
An altitude bug selectable to within 10 feet vs. 100 feet in the G1000 for accurate altitude capture on climbs, descents and on instrument approaches;
Simpler and familiar operation of navcom radios;
Logical grouping of winds aloft, temperature and wind vector data near the HSI for prompt wind corrections;
Intuitive display of engine data near the PFD’s airspeed readout for precise power-pitch adjustments;
An additional CDI display at the bottom of the attitude indicator for a tighter instrument scan on final approach, and;
Graphical METARs, AIRMETs and other weather display on the main map page for quick assessment of current conditions.
I fear that the Aviation Consumer article of 23 March 2006 is a bit like the articles I read claiming that Betamax tape players were the way to go rather than VHS. The articles I read in the early video tape boom claimed that Betamax/Betamovie was the way to go – rather than VHS. In fact, in many ways the Sony Beta system was better, but as we all know it didn’t get the numbers so it faded out of existence. I still have an old Beta player which I can use for some of the tapes I recorded more than a decade ago.
I have used both Avidyne Entegra and Garmin 1000 systems. Yes, the Avidyne Entegra may be slightly easier to use, but this is mainly because it has fewer features. Having said that, the Garmin 1000 is fantastic. As we now know it is the equipment being included with the Cessna Citation Mustang.
It is interesting that Eclipse appeared to have failed with Avidyne and are now selling their aircraft with a hand-held Garmin!
I would imagine at the moment that the sales of the Garmin 1000 compared to the Avidyne Entegra would be about 10:1 in favour of the Garmin G1000.
I’ve just been informed that the new Cessna Caravans will come out with G1000 equipment, and we all know that Cessna is using G1000 equipment in the C172/C182 range.
Anyone who has used the Garmin G1000 will agree that it is unbelievably fantastic. It is almost impossible to believe that software designers (who are obviously flyers) can come up with such an incredible system.
Yes, you do have to understand that Garmin has a few peculiarities. For example, in many cases if you want to go direct to a waypoint on the flight plan, it is easier not to push the “DIRECT TO” button first, but to push the flight plan button, then highlight the field you want to go to, then push “DIRECT TO”, “ENTER”, “ENTER”. This is different to the protocol used by Universal, Collins and Avidyne, however once you are used to it, it becomes second nature.
Personally, I wouldn’t go for anything other than the Garmin G1000 at the present time. Maybe in the future something better will come along, but then I believe it will be made to be compatible with the Garmin protocol software.
I have used both Avidyne Entegra and Garmin 1000 systems. Yes, the Avidyne Entegra may be slightly easier to use, but this is mainly because it has fewer features. Having said that, the Garmin 1000 is fantastic. As we now know it is the equipment being included with the Cessna Citation Mustang.
It is interesting that Eclipse appeared to have failed with Avidyne and are now selling their aircraft with a hand-held Garmin!
I would imagine at the moment that the sales of the Garmin 1000 compared to the Avidyne Entegra would be about 10:1 in favour of the Garmin G1000.
I’ve just been informed that the new Cessna Caravans will come out with G1000 equipment, and we all know that Cessna is using G1000 equipment in the C172/C182 range.
Anyone who has used the Garmin G1000 will agree that it is unbelievably fantastic. It is almost impossible to believe that software designers (who are obviously flyers) can come up with such an incredible system.
Yes, you do have to understand that Garmin has a few peculiarities. For example, in many cases if you want to go direct to a waypoint on the flight plan, it is easier not to push the “DIRECT TO” button first, but to push the flight plan button, then highlight the field you want to go to, then push “DIRECT TO”, “ENTER”, “ENTER”. This is different to the protocol used by Universal, Collins and Avidyne, however once you are used to it, it becomes second nature.
Personally, I wouldn’t go for anything other than the Garmin G1000 at the present time. Maybe in the future something better will come along, but then I believe it will be made to be compatible with the Garmin protocol software.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DS:
The Eclipse issue with Avidyne was a question I asked.....
Avidyne were evidently suppliers of components and not the completed Entegra Systems as in the Cirrus, Piper and Adam (and most pre-2007 Columbias).
It is interesting that Eclipse are delivering their Jets as VFR only right now!. I guess that explains the hand-held Garmin.
It is also interesting that Eclipse parted ways with Avidyne but did not choose the Garmin G1000 or choose Garmin to supply anything other than transponders!.
I'm not knocking Garmin as I retro'd 430s in my other aircraft and love it. In addition, Garmin does have good support which is important to me.
However, I too have used both the Avidyne and the G1000 and my individual tastes lean towards a large clear display, EASE of operation and situational awareness - that is why I will eventually go Avidyne (and Cirrus).
The Eclipse issue with Avidyne was a question I asked.....
Avidyne were evidently suppliers of components and not the completed Entegra Systems as in the Cirrus, Piper and Adam (and most pre-2007 Columbias).
It is interesting that Eclipse are delivering their Jets as VFR only right now!. I guess that explains the hand-held Garmin.
It is also interesting that Eclipse parted ways with Avidyne but did not choose the Garmin G1000 or choose Garmin to supply anything other than transponders!.
I'm not knocking Garmin as I retro'd 430s in my other aircraft and love it. In addition, Garmin does have good support which is important to me.
However, I too have used both the Avidyne and the G1000 and my individual tastes lean towards a large clear display, EASE of operation and situational awareness - that is why I will eventually go Avidyne (and Cirrus).
RFG, if you go with Avidyne in the Cirrus, do you have to go with the Garmin GPS and Garmin communications, or can you actually go with other equipment? It seems to me that if you have to mix the equipment that you may as well go Garmin in the first place. What do you think?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DS:
The Cirrus set-up works for me;
I love the 430's and when I used the Avidyne/Garmin integration I found it to be more user friendly than the G1000.
I didn't ask Cirrus the question as I don't need to as I like to set-up as is. But as you asked - I will email Cirrus for an answer.
The Cirrus set-up works for me;
I love the 430's and when I used the Avidyne/Garmin integration I found it to be more user friendly than the G1000.
I didn't ask Cirrus the question as I don't need to as I like to set-up as is. But as you asked - I will email Cirrus for an answer.
I didn't think Cirrus offered any alternative as an option... but I await your info.
It's disappointing with the Cirrus Garmin Avidyne combo you can't scroll on ahead to your intended destination and zoom in for more detail. Seems this expensive IFR gear lacks many of the features of my trusty Garmin 296 Hand-Held. No doubt it's due to the time and money it takes to get the software TSO'ed for IFR use.
I sit here waiting for the technology to catch up and the price to go down so I can buy the all in one for legal experimental NVFR. Right now the most affordable option is a reco'ed GNS430 or similar with terrain alterts hooked up to the Avidyne. It's a pity with all the mixing and matching.
It's disappointing with the Cirrus Garmin Avidyne combo you can't scroll on ahead to your intended destination and zoom in for more detail. Seems this expensive IFR gear lacks many of the features of my trusty Garmin 296 Hand-Held. No doubt it's due to the time and money it takes to get the software TSO'ed for IFR use.
I sit here waiting for the technology to catch up and the price to go down so I can buy the all in one for legal experimental NVFR. Right now the most affordable option is a reco'ed GNS430 or similar with terrain alterts hooked up to the Avidyne. It's a pity with all the mixing and matching.
Also look at the thread which has come up under “similar threads” here.
It is interesting to note the claim that Cirrus has an investment in Avidyne. That may explain everything.
By the way, most importantly the Garmin now comes with an excellent flight director and Garmin autopilot. Does the Avidyne have a fully coupled flight director?
It is interesting to note the claim that Cirrus has an investment in Avidyne. That may explain everything.
By the way, most importantly the Garmin now comes with an excellent flight director and Garmin autopilot. Does the Avidyne have a fully coupled flight director?
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Age: 61
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dick, I have used both but have way more time on the Avidyne. Mine has a FD. I found the G1000 to have a few more features and it did have the cool factor of the remote entry pad (I think this is only on a Columbia - and I think its probably more of a gimick). The ability to switch PFD and MFD was good too. The Garmin wasn't as intuitive and seemed smaller. I have been using 430's for years so using the Avidyne with the 430s for me wasn't an issue. The net for me is I think they both produce good product. Garmin probably has more R&D dollars available for future enhancements but Avidyne seem to be growing and investing.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DS:
I have an answer from Cirrus:
The Avidyne/Garmin combo is here to stay. The G1000 is not going to be offered as an option in the forseeable future.
However, Cirrus does look at Garmin, Honeywell, L3, Chelton and others on a regular basis as these companies pitch their wares to Cirrus on a regular basis.
In fact, Cirrus told me that Garmin owns an SR22 GTS as their G1000 testbed!. Garmin pitched that setup to Cirrus and right now - Cirrus will continue to stick with the Avidyne and Garmin intergration.
It was pointed out to me by a Cirrus 'Classic' owner that if Garmin were smart - they would STC the G1000 to fit into the older Cirrus 'Classic' - that could help push their case with Cirrus Design.
Right now, I am more than satisfied with the current setup on the Cirrus.
I have an answer from Cirrus:
The Avidyne/Garmin combo is here to stay. The G1000 is not going to be offered as an option in the forseeable future.
However, Cirrus does look at Garmin, Honeywell, L3, Chelton and others on a regular basis as these companies pitch their wares to Cirrus on a regular basis.
In fact, Cirrus told me that Garmin owns an SR22 GTS as their G1000 testbed!. Garmin pitched that setup to Cirrus and right now - Cirrus will continue to stick with the Avidyne and Garmin intergration.
It was pointed out to me by a Cirrus 'Classic' owner that if Garmin were smart - they would STC the G1000 to fit into the older Cirrus 'Classic' - that could help push their case with Cirrus Design.
Right now, I am more than satisfied with the current setup on the Cirrus.
Garmin does have a nifty product for retrofit in older panels, it's the G600.
Two 6.5 inch displays mounted vertically side by side and the whole thing fits in place of the standard six flight instruments and works with existing
430 and 530 GPS's
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=153&pID=6427#
Two 6.5 inch displays mounted vertically side by side and the whole thing fits in place of the standard six flight instruments and works with existing
430 and 530 GPS's
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=153&pID=6427#
Last edited by Peter Fanelli; 2nd May 2007 at 07:35.
"Garmin does have a nifty product for retrofit in older panels, it's the G600"
I want one!
Now ....... I am sure I can find a spare US$30k lying around here somewhere!
Dr
I want one!
Now ....... I am sure I can find a spare US$30k lying around here somewhere!
Dr
OK, the G600 might be nice and all that but here is something that is actually affordable, takes up little space and interfaces with older NAV radios and autopilots.
http://www.aspenavionics.com/index.p...cts/evolution/
They're suggesting a price of US$6k and around another 2k for installation here in the states. Sounds like a bargain to me and it might still be a bargain landed in Australia.
Wotcha think?
http://www.aspenavionics.com/index.p...cts/evolution/
They're suggesting a price of US$6k and around another 2k for installation here in the states. Sounds like a bargain to me and it might still be a bargain landed in Australia.
Wotcha think?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anyone have experience of the differences in reliability/maintenance cost? I've heard a couple of horror stories when the red crosses come up on the Cirrus display.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 2005 Mooney Ovation and have about 100 plus hours time on the G1000 system. It’s a learning curve as you transition from steam driven gauges, but it becomes second nature after 30-40 hrs.
One thing you really need to think hard and long about is how would you handle a total system failure (MFD + PFD) in IMC. It has redundancy built in, but should both screens go blank you have electric A/H, altimeter, airspeed and compass to find your way home with NO navigation information. I think the A/P reverts to a wing leveler on loss of navigation input (must check that).
I have a Garmin 296 to supplement the standby instruments and navigate in an emergency situation, and simply wouldn’t leave home without it.
I saw the dreaded red crosses when the AHRS failed (on the ground), and it took about 35 days going backwards and forwards before it was repaired/replaced. Garmin seemed reluctant to send the replacement AHRS from Singapore and we had to rattle their cage to get it. If your aircraft was in revenue operation you would not be happy.
I’m told the G1000 software still has bugs, as it took at least 3 different software uploads in the replacement AHRS before it would function (luckily it was still in warranty). Garmin also replaced both PFD and MFD in Feb 2006 due to delaminating of the display, but I think there was a bad batch and it’s not ongoing.
Garmin need to improve their customer service through better product training for their agents in AU. They didn’t carry exchange modules in stock in Australia, but they did in Singapore. There are a lot more G1000 panels in AU - in Adelaide there is a Cessna single and the college have a half dozen DA42 twins, so I think that situation will improve.
VERDICT: Great System, Questionable Redundancy, Inadequate Parts Inventory in AU, Insufficient Product Knowledge/Experience (in AU).
IMHO they took it to the market with insufficient development/trialing, without properly training their service agents to support it, and customers are paying the price in extended downtime.
One thing you really need to think hard and long about is how would you handle a total system failure (MFD + PFD) in IMC. It has redundancy built in, but should both screens go blank you have electric A/H, altimeter, airspeed and compass to find your way home with NO navigation information. I think the A/P reverts to a wing leveler on loss of navigation input (must check that).
I have a Garmin 296 to supplement the standby instruments and navigate in an emergency situation, and simply wouldn’t leave home without it.
I saw the dreaded red crosses when the AHRS failed (on the ground), and it took about 35 days going backwards and forwards before it was repaired/replaced. Garmin seemed reluctant to send the replacement AHRS from Singapore and we had to rattle their cage to get it. If your aircraft was in revenue operation you would not be happy.
I’m told the G1000 software still has bugs, as it took at least 3 different software uploads in the replacement AHRS before it would function (luckily it was still in warranty). Garmin also replaced both PFD and MFD in Feb 2006 due to delaminating of the display, but I think there was a bad batch and it’s not ongoing.
Garmin need to improve their customer service through better product training for their agents in AU. They didn’t carry exchange modules in stock in Australia, but they did in Singapore. There are a lot more G1000 panels in AU - in Adelaide there is a Cessna single and the college have a half dozen DA42 twins, so I think that situation will improve.
VERDICT: Great System, Questionable Redundancy, Inadequate Parts Inventory in AU, Insufficient Product Knowledge/Experience (in AU).
IMHO they took it to the market with insufficient development/trialing, without properly training their service agents to support it, and customers are paying the price in extended downtime.
I have had a "play" with the G1000 in a C182. Undoubtedly a spectacular bit of kit, and fairly intuitive to use for someone with GPSMap296 / GNS430 experience.
I love "toys" as much as the next bloke, BUT I think the G1000 is huge over kill in a lightie, and I would be very nervous owning a G1000 equipped aeroplane that was out of warranty.
Ovation's expereince supports that.
What's the cost of replacing an MFD that is kaput?
Dr
I love "toys" as much as the next bloke, BUT I think the G1000 is huge over kill in a lightie, and I would be very nervous owning a G1000 equipped aeroplane that was out of warranty.
Ovation's expereince supports that.
What's the cost of replacing an MFD that is kaput?
Dr
Last edited by ForkTailedDrKiller; 24th Jul 2007 at 21:23.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ovation's story is fairly typical of what Ive heaerd and not much better in Europe. Downtime would be a real PITA on your new $500000 wonder machine but I've also heard about $30K + for a replacement display out of warranty - is that right???
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure about Garmin but when I asked the question - I was told Avidyne has a fixed price repair for around US$1000 plus freight.
Avidyne also have an out-of-warranty annual support option that covers any repairs during a 12 month period. Again, plus freight.
Avidyne also have an Exchange program via the Cirrus dealer in Brisbane but only for units in warranty.
Avidyne also have an out-of-warranty annual support option that covers any repairs during a 12 month period. Again, plus freight.
Avidyne also have an Exchange program via the Cirrus dealer in Brisbane but only for units in warranty.