Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

18 week Fast Track CPL course

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Feb 2007, 11:52
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hobart
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Neville-N for raising this, each time I read this thread the hair pricks on the back of my neck..

Justin you said.."I HEARD a that a metro is the largest A/C you can fly without ATPL, but i`m not 100% sure". NOT SURE you are the commander be sure boy, or don't do it. Next time you go to work look at your passengers they expect you to know.. Not sure? then be sure, find out.. command is not about what you write in your log book.....for crying out loud, 5 years in the right hand seat is what you need...
justanoldboy is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2007, 23:55
  #62 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL! I think you need to invest in some razors, that is to trim those prickly neck hairs as it seems they are giving you some trouble . I don`t fly metro`s, I never said I did. Perhaps you should read all the posts before submitting a reply, so you know exactly what is being said. I said was that I wasn`t 100% sure whether you needed an atpl to hold a command on one.

Once again, CASA say you CAN log ICUS hours with a CPL, IF you hold a command endorsement on type... plain and simple. check your CAR

Last edited by Justin.C; 26th Feb 2007 at 02:10.
Justin.C is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 00:22
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe exposure to the industry for a start
Exposure to the industry is often the demon, that evidently turns many bitter and twisted. Just check out these forums 90% of the time.

The time factor is of little consequence. The qaulity of the instruction is much more important.
podbreak is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 00:29
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly the times have changed

Neville,

The FOI mentioned in your post is by no means an isolated individual perpetuating a personal belief that ICUS "should not" be logged by someone with so little experience. This line of thought is reflected throughout GA but many of the larger regionals and airlines in fact rely on new F/O's logging ICUS.

Objectively the answer is simple: Does the pilot have a CPL (minimum)? Do they hold a COMMAND endorsement on type? (this perhaps should be the topic of discussion) A Command Instrument rating? Does the operator say they can do it? If the answer is yes to all of the above then legally the pilot can log ICUS.

As you mentioned, the good old days of hiring a pilot who already had an ATPL with thousands of hours as an F/O is well and truly gone. I think it is good time that somebody (this training mob) dispensed with this outdated way of thinking and actively looked for a way to gain hours in a non traditional way.

Watching,
I
Iinthesky is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 00:41
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 54
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not saying that's what I think just saying from my experience that's what a particular CASA FOI says, and therefore was gospel for the operation. They see ICUS as a means of getting experience in the LH seat whilst preparing for a command check, not a means of building time. They were talking about people having licenses and experience before even commencing ICUS.
Well, this has been covered before, there is no requirement for said ICUS logger to be in the LH seat or have a certain amount of experience. In fact, airlines such as QF have F/Os log ICUS for their sectors (its in the FAM). Outside of Oz, this is necissary, and has been that way for many, many years. The idea of ICUS being soley a training tool is false.
podbreak is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 03:08
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hobart
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Justin my apology you are quite correct I didn't read the thread fully.

My wife accuses me of becoming a grump, probably just that you young fellas remind me of myself 40 years ago...Just jealous..


Enjoy every bit of your career it's the best....
justanoldboy is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 03:43
  #67 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No hard feelings there Oldboy
Justin.C is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 07:04
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth
Age: 36
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey what were you FT boys all dressed up for today?? looked like you were all off to a funeral or something??
that young block looked like a clown in a jacket way too big for him lol
Swanie is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2007, 08:08
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: QRH
Posts: 546
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Is there nothing preventing you from holding a command endorsement on a type that would require you to have an ATPL to fly? It seems like a double standard..."yes we'll let you have a command endorsement, but no, we won't let you fly it as PIC!"

Led Zep is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2007, 06:53
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth
Age: 36
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hardly a job if you pay them for your first year's employment
how many did you hear paid up??
Swanie is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2007, 05:22
  #71 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,127
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
Just my thoughts....
To log ICUS surely you need to be not only endorsed, but also LICENCED on type, ie ATPL? with the associated 250 hours in command, 1500 hours total, be over 21 years old etc? The metros flying around these parts weigh 7484kg from memory......
Would hate to see these studes who think they have found "the easy way" to find themselves stuck in RHS (with only 50% of hours counting) for years and years.......after having to buy the job as well...unable to move on, either to LHS or to purchse another endorsement?
All that glitters is not gold......caveat emptor.
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 15:33
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard this week 3 CFI's have resigned from their flying schools to move onto better jobs and their schools can't replace them!!! Its a happening thing now!!! Next the majors will be wondering how to train pilots quicker - Supply and Demand changes everything!!
Mesopause is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2007, 16:13
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Charlie Foxtrot India

You don’t need to have an ATPL to hold a P1 rating on something like a Metro or even a B747 for that matter in RPT ops. The only restriction is you can’t be in command. You can log ICUS or P1US though which you would do every time you are pilot flying. When you are pilot not flying you log P2.

poorlypaidpilot

You will find that CAR 5.173 (2) states that of the 250 hours command required for the issue of an Australian ATPL, 150 hours of it can be ICUS.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2007, 05:08
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,076
Received 151 Likes on 66 Posts
Yep that one was changed a few years ago on the quiet. You used to have to have 500 COMMAND. Love to see the justification for such a significant devaluation of the license. ATPL with a 100 Command, really isn't enough IMHO.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2007, 06:15
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
neville_nobody

I realise the latest copy of the CAR’s indicates that that particular page was last amended in 2003 but I should point out that my copy is from 2000 with the last previous amendment in 1998. A tad more than a few years I would say.

It would be interesting if someone has an original copy of the CAR 1988 to see what the requirement was back then. I did my ATPL’s in 1995 and don’t recall the requirements being any different to what they are today. I could be wrong though as my memory is a little faded.
404 Titan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.