Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

NAS is dead so the new acronym is SDE (Service Delivery Environment)

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

NAS is dead so the new acronym is SDE (Service Delivery Environment)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Nov 2006, 21:28
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,142
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jumpuFOKKERjump
These arguements have already started, with Regional trying to pinch airspace off High Density in a workload maximising manner so they will have something to do and still feel important...
Well, well ... how the wheel has turned. It's started already. It's now High Density v Regional Services .... a la ATCs v FSOs

These Airservices shiny bums aren't as silly as we think. Divide and Conquer. It's worked before and it'll work again.

A little bit down the track ... pitch ATC(High Density) aginst Flight Service(Regional Services) and High Density will happily siddle up to Aiservices if the usual promise of ... "all this will be yours one day" .. is given.

Love it !
peuce is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2006, 01:38
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Straya
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It may even be as successful as the ML Centre vs. BN Centre competition.

And TCU consolidation.

Can you imagine if their was a (truly independent) Royal Commmission (with an open terms of reference) in to Government involvement in Aviation in Australia?

Well actually - it would probably take 3 years, and would be so damning, it would just turn in to a political bun fight of passing the blame.

But hey - what a show it would be!!

Funnily enough, someone who would probably have a lot of questions to answer is predicting just that.

Last edited by Shitsu_Tonka; 4th Nov 2006 at 02:03.
Shitsu_Tonka is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2006, 06:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,142
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ****su_Tonka
Can you imagine if their was a (truly independent) Royal Commmission (with an open terms of reference) in to Government involvement in Aviation in Australia?
I daresay there are many of us just itchin' for the day when we can put some of our facts and documents on the Royal table ...
peuce is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2006, 09:34
  #24 (permalink)  
I'm in one of those moods
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SFC to A085
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... if I get any itchier I will bleed
.
.. and stuff the RC (The little bloke and his ilk can knobble them) ... 'separation of powers' is the answer .. he cannot stop that, particualrly if the argument can be made (and it can) that political skullduggery was 'likely' involved in the safety outcomes!! .... pick a court .. any court
.
'Mods' ... a hypothetical:-
.
.. If a musing (from a usual protagonist) was available on the web, and it was reproduced here (de-identified) without the link to the originating site (so as to not promote) … could we copy post it (modified to de-identify the author) and then address the statements made for the purpose of discussion and correct/contrary public information?
Scurvy.D.Dog is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2006, 12:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peuce,

I reckon you're on the money. AsA has been watching Qantas do this to its' organization "successfully" for the past few years and is following suit. AsA splits itself into 3 seperate business, each competing. Eventually each ATC crew will be paid differently, work very different rosters (might even be able to cut out doggoes and Sundays, reducing leave entitlements and pay rates), and provide very different services. We'll end arguing with each other about conditions rather than uniting and further down the toilet we go.

Heavy RPT get "an improved level of service" (what they pay for) at a much cheaper cost price to AsA (don't expect Asa to give much of it back ). Everyone else...you don't pay, you can't play.

Last edited by Roger Standby; 6th Nov 2006 at 00:53. Reason: to spell Peuce's name properly
Roger Standby is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.