Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

QF Recruitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Sep 2006, 08:59
  #21 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks alidad. I'll see if I can get a copy of it on the aircraft on Monday morning.
Keg is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 00:29
  #22 (permalink)  
N2O
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Collateral damage

The new laws have unintended consequences. Yes, they give those 60+ an opportunity to pay less tax via superannuation contributions... should they wish to continue flogging to LAX. However, it also makes it more difficult for J* attract expats home after July 1 2007, see this discussion HERE [pprune.org].
I wonder just how deep that well is now...
N2O is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 01:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately the only time the beancounters or the public will recognise the VALUE of experienced crews rather that the COST of having them will be in bitter hindsight after a BIG stuffup. Until then neither seem to be able to differenciate between a 200 hour cadet or a 20,000 hour veteran. After all - the aircraft currently arrive on time, in one piece, does it not?
alidad is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 03:44
  #24 (permalink)  
N2O
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alidad, I don't want to hijack this thread but...
How stupid of the 'beancounters' to deny themselves a bigger bonus! It just shows how out of touch they are with their own business.
In another thread, J*'s own figures indicate fuel accounts for 25.8% of costs. Pilot costs are probably close to 1%, yet have a significant bearing on fuel used. In short the 1% cost controls the 25.8% costs. Fuel is even more significant to an LCC because, by definition all other costs are smaller as a proportion. Fuel use determines the profitablity of an LCC.
Southwest, the mother of all LCC's knows this and employs the best people it can get & pays them well. It is consistantly profitable, proven model. It doesn't try to destroy it own people for short term gain, it rewards and nurtures them. Thats the difference between profit & chapter 11.
N2O is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.