Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Airport Friendly Shoes???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2006, 02:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: aust
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Airport Friendly Shoes???

Can anyone suggest some airport friendly shoes. That is, ones without metal in them. I would rather avoid taking my shoes off when going through security each time. I have been to a few shoe shops and asked this question, without any luck.

Thanks in advance.
showerofsparks is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 03:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aust
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Double pluggers or dunlop volleys (if you can afford them on pilots wages)
ascj is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 06:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Endor
Age: 83
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wot's wrong with Blunnies?
YesTAM is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 06:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Crookwell
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never have probs with shoes, but sometimes I have to take my belt off, sometimes I don't!

Funny.


..Disco
disco_air is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 06:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RM Boots

My RM's brown boots set off the alarms, whilst my Black RM's don't.... Work that out
brame is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 07:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: vic
Age: 23
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doc martens go real well with the metal detectors. No probs yet and a fair few of my colleagues have them as well and also no probs. Bit pricey though but ten years out of my last pair was good value for money.
dodgybrothers is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 07:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: australia
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My brown RM's have never set off the alarm in ADL or MEL.
And come to think of neither have an old pair of black Aviator boots made by Rivers, but I don't think they make them anymore.

My genuine fake Breitling though did on one day set off the alarm the next day it didn't. And there wasn't even a drop dead stunningly good looking girl manning security!!!!!!!

Go figure

Go the RM's, they're Aussie made and tough.
Deejay 1 is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 07:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's some helpful advice from TSA:
'Footwear that screeners are less likely to suggest you remove includes:
"Beach" flip-flops
Thin-soled sandals (without metal)'
http://www.tsa.gov/public/interapp/e...orial_1050.xml
Probably best to avoid these: '...during a routine security check on January 31, authorities at Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport discovered electrical devices concealed inside the shoes of Gua Hongen, a Chinese national traveling through Istanbul from Beijing, China to Tripoli, Libya. The discovery of the device triggered a security alert at the airport.'
http://www.homelandsecurity.com/modu...index&view=535
But hopefully these will be deployed soon: '...the TSA is inviting companies to voluntarily participate in a test program to develop technologies for “Shoe Weapons Inspection Systems (SWIS) that can inspect footwear for weapons without passengers having to remove or divest them from their feet.”'
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8899022/

I'm no cobbler but most decent pairs of shoes probably have a degree of metallic content and, despite the nuisance, there's good reason for the extra scrutiny. Definitely avoid the thicker soled jobs. A good pair of Hush Puppies work for me...!
talespin is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 08:43
  #9 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
talespin you said,
despite the nuisance, there's good reason for the extra scrutiny.
If the quote is an endorsement of the increased security regime, then I'd say cobblers to that!

If one looney trying to set his foot bomb alight is reason to cause so much inconvenience and chaos at airports, then we should go the whole hog.
  • test each and every pilot & cc member for drugs an alcohol, because more than one has been caught trying to perform their duties under the influence.
  • test each and every baggie for drugs and alcohol, as they commence duty and each time they leave the premisis, as they've been known to be under the influence. There are even rumours that they facilitate the flow of contraband in and out of airports.
  • Test every bluddy body.
  • In fact, ban aeroplanes because they've been known to crash and kill people.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 08:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try uggh boots.

And yeah man, ban everything.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 10:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Claret
If the quote is an endorsement of the increased security regime, then I'd say cobblers to that!
If one looney trying to set his foot bomb alight is reason to cause so much inconvenience and chaos at airports, then we should go the whole hog.
Capt Claret
With the greatest respect, this wasn't just a lone looney. His mate got cold feet - have a look at:
'Reluctant shoe-bomb plotter jailed

A would-be British suicide bomber was jailed for 13 years Friday for plotting to blow up a US-bound passenger plane in mid-air in tandem with jailed "shoe bomber" Richard Reid.

Saajid Badat, 25, who pleaded guilty in February, decided not to go ahead with the plot, which would have seen him blow up a plane simultaneously with Reid in December 2001.

Instead he kept the dismantled device at his home in St James, Gloucester, in the west of England, where pieces were found in a police raid. ...'
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems...4/s1352003.htm
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/eu...bomb.sentence/
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...505707,00.html

And then there was this:
'Four al Qaeda operatives were supposed to hijack an airliner, seize the controls and ram the aircraft into the tallest building on the West Coast -- the U.S. Bank Tower, formerly known as the Library Tower. The weapons used were to have been explosives the operatives concealed in their shoes, which supposedly would have aided them in blowing off the cockpit doors.'
http://www.stratfor.com/products/pre...89&countryId=1

I understand your gripe, especially having pilots screened - and believe me I don't enjoy playing footsie with the guards anymore than you do - but the problem is if you start making exceptions, where do you stop? The baddies have the intent and the know-how - I heard a security brief a while back that darn near knocked my socks off - and I'd much rather go through a bit of a hassle on the ground than go to bits at FL340. My gripe is if they don't do everybody over equally - eg ground staff with airside access - and keep their minds on the job 100% of the time.

Cheers

PS: Sorry to hijack the point of your thread, showerofsparks. And for the bad punning.

Last edited by talespin; 18th May 2006 at 10:28.
talespin is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 13:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In a burrow
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buy the shoes you like, and keep the receipt.

Take them with you (not wear them) next time you go to work, and ask security can you test them through the walk-through screener to see if they 'set it off'. If they set the machine off, take them back and pick another pair. Very sad, but it's what things have come to unfortunately.

It worked fine for me.
Capt Basil Brush is offline  
Old 18th May 2006, 13:25
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seoul/Gold Coast.....
Posts: 383
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Try Aussie made RIVERS brand, mine don't excite any detectors anywhere. And that includes numerous U.S. airports where the sensitivity is normally wound right up.
zlin77 is online now  
Old 19th May 2006, 00:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Caloundra. Qld. Australia
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It Don't Matter

It doesn't matter one little bit what you wear. Even if you have frog skin Japanese riding boots, you get the dreaded SSSS on your Boarding Pass in the US and off comes the shoes. Always amazes me. The SSSS are supposed to be computer generated, yet it is usually the single (travelling that is) white anglo saxon that appears to get picked.
I wear a medium size watch and on a my last two visits to the US this year, I've played a little game going thru the various securities. As I walk thru with the watch on, I allow my arm to swing slightly out from my side. Sure enough, off she goes. Next time I walk thru with my arm across my midriff. No alarm. Try it some time.
nasa is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 01:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hell...where angels ride harleys
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by talespin
Here's some helpful advice from TSA:
'Footwear that screeners are less likely to suggest you remove ...

when was the last time that they "REQUESTED" you remove your shoes??

normally "TAKE YOUR SHOES OFF" are about the only words of english they speak, and then they BARK at you ... hardly a "request"!

FWIW, security cannot MAKE you remove any part of your clothing. they can REQUEST only. you have the right to refuse, and trhen be subject to a "wanding"... then they can do a "private search", which you can DEMAND that be doen by two officers of the same sex as you...
chief wiggum is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 02:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ozmate
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never set off a metal detector wearing my RM's.
Have had three pairs of "Tambo" style RM's and walk straight through every time.
Great boots too!!!
woftam is offline  
Old 19th May 2006, 07:44
  #17 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by nasa
As I walk thru with the watch on, I allow my arm to swing slightly out from my side. Sure enough, off she goes. Next time I walk thru with my arm across my midriff. No alarm. Try it some time.
Arms behind your back (at ease) works well!!
Howard Hughes is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 04:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another vote for RMs, no probs here (mine are black) and great quality boots.
GearOff is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 05:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My RM's quite frequently set off the detectors.
Had them since 1992 though, no chance of me parting wtih them!
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 20th May 2006, 06:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My shoes have metal in them but they are really good shoes and I like them. If I step through the detectors so only one foot is in the detection zone at any time they almost never go off. Its usually a bigger than normal step and looks a little weird but thats I hate having to take my bl**dy shoes off everytime I go to work
Lab_Rat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.