Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Caravan Ran off runway at Caloundra

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Caravan Ran off runway at Caloundra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2006, 09:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: cooly
Age: 54
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caravan Ran off runway at Caloundra

From the last thread about the Caravan Crash at Caloundra. Someone has edited a post after it closed. Quite interesting.

It reads that the pilot claimed to have been distracted by another plane parked at the terminal.

Anyone know what the plane at the terminal was doing to distract him from his primary objective. You know, LANDING???

I just don't get how you can miss the whole runway. It's one thing to land long, but another thing to touch down after the end of the runway.


hmmmmm, can anyone help me on this one??
redline
redline1969 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 09:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I asked the same question on the original thread as well. Somehow the answer got lost in the myriad of "how to manage" the turbine/propellor combination responses.

Just how does one stuff up an approach and landing that finishes up 450 or so metres past the upwind end of a 700 metre dry bitumen runway (and knock down a 3 metre chain wire fence to boot)

"another plane (sic) parked at the terminal"

There is NO terminal at Caloundra (toilet yes, terminal NO).

I wonder if "another plane parked at the terminal" is code for "I really stuffed that up"

tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 10:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I was wondering the same thing myself. Me thinks someone spun a great story to the local newspaper reporter who took it hook, line and sinker. It was then posted here on Pprune and again taken as gospel by some. To be distracted as a single pilot in an emergency is one thing, but two pilots making a decision to carry out a simulated forced landing and then overshooting by around 60mts, please Woomera, let this go on a bit, surely there is more to this than what Senior Sargent Ken has to say about it.
Sir HC is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 10:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RE: Newspaper Reports

The local very amateurish "Sunshine Coast Daily" was the word for word source quoted by other papers elsewhere.

This same SCD also had a report yesterday about the local RC aircraft club. That report claimed the club set a world record of some 57 secs to cover 10 laps of a 4 KM course.

Yep thats nearly 2400 kilometre per hour, PHEW

I think we can safely say "some of the press report is factual and some is not".

tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 03:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There would have to be other factors here that we do not yet know about. The instructor is a very experienced well known gentleman, as was the student.
I remember there being a mod that came out for the C208 that was required for UK certification, that among other things meant some kind of additional "gate" on the power lever to get it forward of flight idle, I don't remember anything being modified or different about the prop lever. My memory is a bit scratchy, does any one else have any thing to add to which might have troubled them in unfeathering the prop?
Full Noise is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 06:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Story is that the instructor was demonstrating a fully feathered approach and simply floated beyond the end of the runway. I know nil about Caravans but have been told that it takes about 10 seconds to come out of feather making it very difficult to have a last second change of mind.
Freedom3 is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 07:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full Noise

I think the "mod" you may be refering to is that the track for the conditon lever is covered by a strip of rubber (for want of a better description). I am not sure of the reason it is there, but effectively you are unable to visually see where the lever is in respect to the gate.

Re this incident, the instructer will carry the can but one wonders why there is not a standard to teach to.

Pub 47 was a standard for instructors, perhaps that needs to be reinvented.

Last edited by Gen Ties; 30th Jan 2006 at 22:12.
Gen Ties is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 09:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Close to space
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep the prop does take a while to come out of feather. When I was in a real hurry I would push the power lever up after pushing the prop up and it would unfeather quicker, well as it seemed to me. Anyone else agree? But that was if the engine was kept going, normaly we would start at full fine.
helldog is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 11:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fully Feathered glide approach

If this procedure is normally applied to achieve best glide range in the C208 then you would think the "INSTRUCTOR" would be familiar with it and skilled in its application including his JUDGEMENT of the approach.

Similar to the use of coarse pitch in a piston single glide approach, giving a bit less drag and more gliding range (a good thing methinks).

Surely this is simply a human factor of a misjudged approach? For any number of reasons, rushing, over-confidence, or simply an honest stuff up. We all make them from time to time BUT...an instructor demonstrating an emergency has a duty of care to avoid the exercise becoming a REAL emergency!

Of course I'm serious...and don't call me Shirley!

Z.
Zhaadum is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 20:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Northern NSW
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a matter of interest, this particular 208B is an FAA certificated job and does not have the British CAA kit, which among other things requires the rubber strips covering the quadrant slots (presumably to stop things dropping in, eg British coins or some such). The detents are visible on the FAA aircraft.
HarveyGee is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 11:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Folks, it doesn't matter, just heard a rumour that ATSB may not choose to investigate this insignificant little incident.
The subject is apparently closed and finished, regardless of everyone's knowledge of feather, low idle, high idle, rubber strips etc.
do as the guvmint has decreed, move on!
where's the taxi driver when he's really needed?
Captain Starlight is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 03:47
  #12 (permalink)  

Check Attitude
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starlight

Confirmed.

No latex gloves, no loss of RPT AOC, no cancelling of Chief Pilot approvals,

no cancelling of pilot's ratings and approvals.

(This is what the taxidriver did to their neighbour, lucky he's gone ?)

This is a new era, counselling and consoling instead of bastardry, no problems with that, it's how things can be handled.

It's called safety, not enforcement opportunity.

MF
Mainframe is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 11:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,297
Received 333 Likes on 127 Posts
Thumbs down

So if I want to learn about this accident, in case there is a lesson in it for single turboprop instructors, where do I go? Isn't that part of a flying safety culture?
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 13:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tipsy2
RE: Newspaper Reports
This same SCD also had a report yesterday about the local RC aircraft club. That report claimed the club set a world record of some 57 secs to cover 10 laps of a 4 KM course.
Yep thats nearly 2400 kilometre per hour, PHEW
I think we can safely say "some of the press report is factual and some is not".
tipsy
Don’t know how you come up with your facts tipsy. My simple maths dose not get 2400km/hr
4000/57=70.175m/sec
70.175*60=4210.526m/min
4210.526*60=252631.57m/hr
252631.57/1000=252.63km/hr
Best not to say that the reporter was wrong for that story. It seems quite possible.
AEIO-540 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 19:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats all well and good but its 40 000m covered not 4 000m
ftrplt is online now  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 23:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have raced these aircraft myself and the ten laps = 4km as each lap is 400m.
AEIO-540 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2006, 23:25
  #17 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Danger

'10 laps of a 4km course' is 40,000m.

Ten laps of a course that adds up to 4km is a slightly different thing.

The point is still proven though. The reporting of such events is hugely inaccurate!
Keg is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2006, 02:20
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
400m lap certainly sounds better
ftrplt is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 06:25
  #19 (permalink)  

Check Attitude
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chronic,

check your PM's
Mainframe is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 22:12
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hypocrites with personal agendas.........

Considering nobody was injured or killed, the damage is probably fairly minor, and the entire incident could be described as nothing more than a handling error....why then would the ATSB get together a team of investigators, burn up resources and rush to the scene? What great safety breach are they likely to uncover and what are the likely long term safety benefits to the australian transport industry by having a full suspension of licence and cancellation of all approvals to the operators by a government agency???

Maybe the ATSB should rush out with a full team of investigators and suspend everybody involved each and every time a road train has a fender bender on the pacific highway too.....

Some of you blokes are total hypocrites. You bleat like stuck pigs when the authorities get involved in the busiess of aviation and now you bleat when they don't get involved............I wonder why.
victor two is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.