Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Hard landing issues???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2006, 02:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hard landing issues???

Hi there. After a fleet replacement at my company, there are a number of biscuit chuckers off work on compo for numerous injuries from the result of hard landings, is this a common occurence or what?? I mean I have only ever seen one 'incident' on the ATSB website reading something like "upon landing into HTI, 5 Cabin Crew reported muscle pain from the subsequent hard landing?" Imagine being the skipper on that flight, how f**king embarassing, anyway, anyone have any good stories resulting from hard landings, or anyone ever complained about the landing other than the ol' comment to the skipper "I'll send you my physio bill!!!" I means its been so bad (yet getting better) that we've christened the a/c the chiropractor, 'sure to put your neck back in'! This brings up another point, though a reportable matter "or incident" must be submitted if there is an injury, is this a bit much or what to be filling out an incident form and sending it to the ATSB? I mean a SLF git opened a locker into my head the other week and it bruised quite noticeably, "I WAS INJURED", should the capt have submitted an incident form to ATSB???
boeingwest is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 03:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A while ago I landed a light twin in a howling x-wind and ended up bouncing sideways accross the runway after the 9g touchdown. Strangely all the avionics stopped working at the same time.
Lesson learnt: Know your limits. A Buffalo would have been a better choice of aircraft for the day, it could have landed across the runway into the wind.
Tiger
Tiger 77 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 05:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not sure if you're for real Bwest but if you are I would love to know what a/c type you are talking about. I've nver heard of a plane bi enough to have biscuit chuckers that constistantly lands hard.
cjam is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 06:26
  #4 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cjam it depends to some extent whether one has been spoiled by an aircraft with very forgiving trailing link u/c and then moves onto something with more sweep, high wing loading and more importantly, straight & stiff u/c.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 06:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cjam, I think what Clarrie was trying to say is that the 146 even made his landings look/feel good

tipsy
tipsy2 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 06:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: brisbane
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not the Captains fault
It's not the F.O.s fault
It's the asphalt
whipping boy is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 07:32
  #7 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
tipsy

What? You mean my landings weren't good?

Actually I did once do a bad landing into DRW. Too busy telling a guy new to the drome about various local features, and not busy enough concentrating on what I was doing. The ensuing landing was, shall we say, firm.

A pax in business sitting next to a colleague, said to the colleague, "gee these things land well, don't they", at about the same time I was saying to my F/O, "well I sure planted that one, didn't I".

All this goes to show it's a matter of perception and as pillots, we're only ever as good as our last landing.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 07:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
CC,

You mean my landings weren't good?
Yes, and I'll vouch for that as well!

Besides, it's not the pilots, it's the useless A/T. Crappy lite twins...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 08:01
  #9 (permalink)  
VC9
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A/T works fine if the correct technique is used for the flare. Look to the end of the runway and not at the touchdown point.
VC9 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 08:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clarrie, you were reminiscing about the Dash during the landing, weren't you?
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 08:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Look to the end of the runway and not at the touchdown point.
That works right up to the time you realise, too late, that you're 10kts slow coz the A/T left you there after a ATIO...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 09:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: planet igloo
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unplug everything at 1000' radio..handfly..no A/T...oh and have a trailing link like the mighty 75..... smooth as a smoooth thingi
757manipulator is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 11:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Claret
Actually I did once do a bad landing into DRW. Too busy telling a guy new to the drome about various local features, and not busy enough concentrating on what I was doing. The ensuing landing was, shall we say, firm.
Ease up GG, your not at porn* now!!! Your back in GA, I mean NJ sorry... wrong acronym...

Originally Posted by cjam
not sure if you're for real Bwest but if you are I would love to know what a/c type you are talking about. I've nver heard of a plane bi enough to have biscuit chuckers that constistantly lands hard.
146 to 717. The flying matresses are not coping with the 'firmness' of the DC9iner!!!

Originally Posted by 757manipulator
unplug everything at 1000' radio..handfly..no A/T...oh and have a trailing link like the mighty 75..... smooth as a smoooth thingi
757manipulator, sorry... does the 757 have a trailing link u/c?? None in oz, never been on one... I like I like...
CaptHairDryer is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 11:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... and if disengaging A/T is against SOP instructions?

No Clarrie, Bwest is not ITCZ under another handle. I don't think I could intentionally flout so many grammatical rules as he, even allowing for some of my post-NYE posts at a layover port.

BTW, whats an aim point?

Cheers!
ITCZ is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 11:34
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Runway 21
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm... had a suspicion you were talking about the fancy new jets here.... they do appear to land 'harder' when one watches... then again, it'd be nearly impossible for it not to seem so, given how slow the 146 looks any time....

Hard landings happen to anyone though... was on a DJ flight once, and after landing the F/O remarked, on being asked whose landing it was, "yeah, it was a bit $h!t, wasn't it?!"
SkySista is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 22:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East of YRTI
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile re: Hard Landing Issues

For a change, was a pax on a red with white writing 73-- some time ago into Cairns. How the rubber jungle stayed up ??????? As I departed the a/c, commented to the biscuit chucker,(who had the eyes downcast, definitely no eye contact with anyone) - "Please tell the driver that landing was 8/10!" She looked at me as if I had a screw loose, until I added "Yeah - on the Richter Scale."
kimwestt is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 23:29
  #17 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aw c'mon Bloggs, I can't take all the credit, afterall you did train me.

Jarse I have heard several F/A comment that ex Dash drivers make better landers! Is that what you mean?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2006, 23:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... and ex-Metro pilots are the only ones doing 'greasers.'
CC might be experts on touchdowns, but they cannot see the 1500m markers whizz by and the far threshold approaching at 220km/h as we wait for the mains to touchdown!
ITCZ is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 01:30
  #19 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'll have you know ITCZie that I never close my eyes during landing, consequently I can see the 1500' markers whiz by.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2006, 05:22
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Footlights College, Oxbridge
Age: 47
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've nver heard of a plane bi enough to have biscuit chuckers
You don't have to "Bi" to be a biccy-chucker (or a peanut-pusher).

But speaking of Bi-planes, you're probably referring to the Deathstar which is such a lady's machine, it's worse than "Bi". It's downright raving, flouncing, mincing GAY!!

Oh and it only has ONE main-plane.
Lord Snot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.