Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

The Diamond - DA42

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2005, 13:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Asia / Oceania
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question The Diamond - DA42

What ever happened to the promising Diamond Twin trainer, that was to come into Australia?
Had alot of interest and seemed like a top option but has slid into obscurity.
Capt_CheeseDick is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2005, 02:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Twin Star equipped with the diesel engines has had a few delays from what I read.

There has been cooling issues with the engines. From reading between the lines the aircraft does not meet the performance figures that Diamond were originally quoting, due to changes required to get adequate cooling. The lastest marketing info that I saw does not contain performance figures.

Also I have read that the single engine performance is is much worse than the average light twin.

They are producing a Lycoming IO360 200HP version as well, this aircraft does have better performance figures.

Other comments are that the airframe is heavy, therefore payload is not that great and cabin space is a bit on the small side.

Perhaps the "old clunkers" that are around are not so bad afer all.
27/09 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2005, 01:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Asia / Oceania
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay, thanks for the feedback.
It looked very promising as an "Airline Trainer", especially being all glass.
I recall a proto-type or test model breaking a speed/endurance record across the North Atlantic, about 6 months back?!
Capt_CheeseDick is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2005, 07:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive flown Diamond DA20's

really nice a/c to fly, over 1000 fpm climb rate, nice layout, if the twin flys anything like that it will a beaut A/C
4SPOOLED is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2005, 09:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never sat in, let alone flown, a DA42. BUT (!) I have flown its sister the DA40, the Diamond Star, which has a similar airframe and the identical engine.

It was humorously described by a local aviation newspaper as "a BMW with a VW engine". That is, it looked great, it felt nice to sit in, it was sleek & had clean lines. However, BROC was about 600fpm at 1000' on a typical day with typical load.

It seemed to be a real hangar queen. Hopefully Diamond have sorted out the electronics and engine management by now.

Although the performance figures I've seen for the DA42 look good, it's good to remember that they were quoting (if memory is correct) 85% power at 15000', cruise speed in TAS. Converting that to a more common 75% at 8000' in IAS and it looked like a tired old PA44 in terms of performance.

cheers,
O8
Oktas8 is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2005, 14:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SG
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any idea how much this twin star will cost?
hydrop is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2005, 01:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One sales pitch I saw involved flying about 18 hours a day ("cheap twin time at 3 am")
Not very realistic.
bushy is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2005, 06:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: around
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
''S/E climb performance worse than average twin''

obviously goes down twice as quick.
HEALY is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.