Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Side-slipping in light aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2005, 01:08
  #41 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
POH says to avoid windmilling the prop, so I try to be nice to my toys, 1600-1800 range keeps the engine warm. and carb on for that length of time reduces any risk of ice, bearing in mind the following approach and landing in the next 2 mins or so
7gcbc is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2005, 10:31
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Moorabbin
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Entry into a spin from this configuration, is it more "dynamic" than from a stall?
the best explanation I've seen plus related articles & videos.
AcroAce60 is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2005, 12:19
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
AcroAce60, mate thanks for the link. To be more specific about what I experienced. Was trimed for 100kts at 2000ft, was mucking about just doing turns around something my paxs wanted to look at. Started a turn but led in with a bit more rudder. Seat of pants feeling of deceleration and witnessed by speed decaying 20kts. Unusual getting ANY feeling of deceleration which made me sit up and take notice what was happening. This was only thru maybe 30deg of change of direction so was over a very short period.(I would like to add that at the time I was thinking also along the lines of the extra keel area being presented to airflow was a big factor so at the time was thinking that in a controlled situation, This could be a good thing.)But it felt too wrong so centered the ball and continued the turn. However, now I have seen this and grey matter has been jogged will put this configuration as "Something is telling me that I am not supposed to be here" Am considering an aero endorsment and will definitely ask for this to be included. Curiosity has been satisfied. Thank-you.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2005, 01:18
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gday Ovum
I take it from your post you haven’t flown an aircraft without flaps.

Keeping in mind that every crosswind landing is a sideslip, which I'm pretty sure is what the syllabus is getting at when it says "side slip aeroplane"


Let’s see what that unit 7 of the Aeroplane Pilot Competency Standards has to say about Sideslipping.

TO ENTER SIDESLIP
Wing is lowered during the glide.
Opposite rudder is applied to prevent the turn.
Elevators are used to adjust nose attitude to maintain glide IAS (+10 -5 Knots)
Ailerons are used to maintain bank angle
Rate of descent is adjusted by coordinating angle of bank and applied rudder.
TO RECOVER FROM SIDESLIP
Recovery height is anticipated.
Wings are rolled parallel to horizon using ailerons.
Yaw is controlled with rudder.
TO ENTER A SIDESLIPPING TURN AND RECOVER.
Whilst in a gliding turn opposite rudder is applied to cause aeroplane to sideslip.
Turn and descent rates are controlled by coordinated angle of bank and use of rudder.
IAS is controlled with elevator.
Roll out feature or heading, and height is anticipated.
Wings are rolled parallel to horizon.
Yaw is controlled with rudder.
Nose attitude is adjusted with control column to maintain glide speed.
I have left out some Airmanship points from above eg lookout and oil pressure thingies.

Ovum me old mate if that is what you think is a crosswind landing you must have had some spectacular arrivals and if you do hold a GA licence I would go back to those who trained you and question them as why you weren’t taught as required by the regulations coz someone must have ticked that box.
Sorry to stuff up that theory.

Cheers Q
QNIM is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2005, 01:44
  #45 (permalink)  
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Head in the cockpit watchin the ASI in a tiger moth during a side slip would pretty well end up with you sitting in a pile of crumpled fabric and wires on the end of the runway
tinpis is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2005, 13:14
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been doen this road before when a local hero / grade three instructor protested loudly my use of side slip in a 182. have thought about it and experimented with it at altitude and came up with -

* Cessna flaps are not designed for a sideways load (have a look at them next time you pre flight a cessna and you will understand)

* The 'side on" relative airflow to the pitot tube will cause you asi to under read ( C-182 80 kts indicated at 30 degrees side slip equals 100 kts, try a side slip while watching the asi for confirmation)

*horizontal stabilizer and fuse shields part of the elevators in the side slip reducing control authority (experiment with this at altitude very gently as it will be apparent even at small angles of bank)

* aiming point can be off to one side in a side slip and can be used to correct position as well as height.


Finally don't listen to any crap about side slips being a thing of the past or only good for fixing a bad approach, learn them at a safe height and then chalk it up as a tool of the trade.
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2005, 03:36
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'day QNIM

You're right, I've never flown an aircraft without flaps...my point was in reference to Tinpis' post about the relevance in sideslipping a flapped aeroplane. Thanks for the reference there, however I still stick by my point that every crosswind landing is a sideslip. Anyone who disagrees needs some serious revision in aerodynamics. Just because the competency standard requires you must be able to sideslip in a glide doesn't mean there aren't other times where it would be required.

Anyways, this thread is really starting to pull teeth. Take it easy
ovum is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2005, 09:16
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
DjPil where are you? Try landing an unflapped aircraft like a Decathlon without benefit of the humble sideslip
Sunfish is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2005, 01:05
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to resurrect this thread for a moment to discuss a movie clip I once saw of the Northrup YF-17 at Farnborough (1974?). The Northup pilot, who was narrating the film, said he was a mite "hot and high" on downwind after finishing his routine, so he maintained a slip during his 180 to final.

I asked him afterward if he regarded that as an undue risk. He said "No, it behaves just like a J-3 Cub, I'm very comfortable in a slip with it."

(I've been slipping down final since my third hour of dual, 45 years ago.)
barit1 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2005, 02:07
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,166
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
relative airflow to the pitot tube will cause you asi to
I disagree - the static vent is the primary cause of any error
not designed for a sideways load
I'd say that any side load generated would be well within the design load. However, there's a lot of buffeting and the spanwise load distribution is significantly altered - more asymmetric so loading up one hinge more than the other.

Still haven't flown a J-3, not likely to get into a YF-17.

Sunfish - I've been on hols, not done much flying recently.
djpil is online now  
Old 31st Dec 2005, 02:39
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ozzer
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Ahhhhh Chuck ya wanna ease up on the right rudder there a teensy bit buddy? ahhhhh..Chuck?...god damn !
18 foot pek pek is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2006, 14:41
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by barit1
I'd like to resurrect this thread for a moment to discuss a movie clip I once saw of the Northrup YF-17
Mea culpa. I should think I could at least learn to spell Mr. Northop's name correctly (two "o"s, no "u").

At least that the way the current incarnation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, spells it!
barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.