Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

...............This time wankers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2005, 22:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...............This time wankers

An annoying phrase that won't go away is "This time".


If your departing then it takes no longer to say "XYZ departed 55" rather than "XYZ departed this time"


When taxying, then your taxying why say this time, if your going to say this time then why not say on this fine day too?
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2005, 23:49
  #2 (permalink)  
MOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Euroland
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure which is more anal, people who say "this time", or people who complain about other people who say "this time'...

Besides we all know that ATC are unable to tell time, so...
MOR is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couple of reasons

1. One less number to keep in your head when giving (sometimes) long and complex radio calls.

2. "This time" means right now. If I were to say (at time 55) "Departed time 55" that means that everyone who has an interest in my transmission has to check their timepiece and do a mental conversion, only to realise "Oh, he meant right now!"

(I've never heard anyone giving "this time" as part of a taxi call)

Why is this a problem for you?
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 00:34
  #4 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah yes, but if the pilot's this time is different to the ATCO's this time there can be no cross check of the time!

Besides, this time is just plain lazy.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 02:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 60
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair point

I hadn't thought of that. I do get a time check when taxiing, but of course, am unlikely to be saying "This time" to the ATCO with whom I did a time check.

Disagree with the "plain lazy" call, as I still think it's an aid to other pilots SA.

DIVOSH!
Di_Vosh is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 05:09
  #6 (permalink)  
Seasonally Adjusted
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ...deep fine leg
Posts: 1,125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of a similar nature is the call, "....estimate XXX at time three six". Is it necessary to say 'time'?

Not being anal here, just trying to 'trim some of the fat' from my radio calls.
Towering Q is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 05:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Highland, TX.
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"This time" means now. When you say "Taxiing" you don't need to mention the time. Saying "This time" is a moronic phrase.
Kornholio is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 06:09
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: A Kitchen in Southpark
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Read the AIP.

Last time i checked the word "time" was not even mentioned.

Pretty straight forward really.

The Chef
The Chef is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 06:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Living next door to Alan
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Right on Chef. No requirement anywhere in AIP/Jepps to use the word "time", but it really is amusing to hear it so often.

In addition Cecil, saying the numbers allows a latent check (for ATC) to confirm your clocks are reasonably in synch. This is particularly important in a procedural environment.

If I had a $ for every time somebody got a departure time wrong (including myself), only for the ATCO to query it with a time check, then I'd have a full pocket of dollar coins

Gidday.
Hugh Jarse is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 07:38
  #10 (permalink)  
MOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Euroland
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's just another Americanism, a piece of verbal diahorrea used by people who have watched one too many war movies.

The only words you need to use are the ones described in the AIP. Anything else is unnecessary.

Saying "xxxxx this time" is a complete oxymoron, as all around you already know that is what you are doing without the additional words.

Lastly, it certainly doesn't help Situational Awareness when you are in airspace used by others for whom English is not their first language. Many foreign pilots only have specific english for aviation (particularly Russians), and if you start using non-standard phraseology, you confuse the crap out of them.

Are we really discussing this...?
MOR is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 07:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
MOR, that would be a tautology...repeating the same thing twice

And I fully agree w.r.t. foreign pilots!
compressor stall is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 10:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: down below
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've always wondered why other pilots did it and found it rather annoying. It doesn't mean anything.

I think kiwis do it more.
gatfield is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 14:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Highland, TX.
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As oposed to pilots (usually private pilots -Joe Lighty- and usually kiwis) who announce they are "over the top" of some town/lake/spot-height/whatever when they make a position report.

OTT is where the diggers used to go in WWI, but is not mentioned in the AIP....

Let it stop now.
Kornholio is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 15:11
  #14 (permalink)  
MOR
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Euroland
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about "with you", "out of", etc etc etc... mostly Americans of course...
MOR is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 23:08
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
another one

"XXX rolls this time for XXX" ******

most departure calls require an estimate for the first reporting point???


this time + 27 mins = ???

definelty lazy and oh so coooool
RENURPP is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 06:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah.

Most days listening out on 126.7 one can hear some clown in some hot $hit aircraft give some four (4) point position call when inbound.

None of which mean anything to any VFR pilot.

Inclined to call back "yes, but where are you?"
currawong is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 10:34
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yip have asked that, the best I've heard is 7 calls from inbound to landed in a CTAF with no traffic, only talking to himself.
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 13:12
  #18 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,127
Received 22 Likes on 8 Posts
Angry

Glad it's not just me that gets driven to distraction by the "this time" gnomes.

My pet hate on Perth Radar "All stations in the lane, XXX overhead Fremantle Golf Course AT THIS TIME tracking north in the lane...."

1. It is a radar frequency, get a traffic advisory then we can all hear you and you'll know where the traffic is!

2. There is no lane, it's just pottering along under a control step, the legend on the VTC is "VFR Route", as I understand it a "lane" has CTR each side of it, not the case here.

3. Feel like telling them to learn how to use R/T AT THIS TIME!


Who is teaching them this cr@p? Who gave these people R/T licences??
Charlie Foxtrot India is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 15:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: sydney
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ABC Position????

Why are there so many people just giving position reports with out saying Position, and waiting for atc to tell them to go ahead.

It really annoys me when atc are busy and miss it because they didn't know it was coming so get them to do it again. which just jams up the freq for longer and its usually when your trying to get a call out yourself.

The worst offenders appear to be QF, its sad when air china, paradise, and a host of others all sound more profesional than our national carrier

keep smiling
duke of duchess is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 20:10
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No .. the most useless phrase used is when some pilots get airborne and wish to start their SAR prior to the dep call...

".... airborne place, standby for departure"

Just what else is ATS going to do? Go and have a cup of tea... they are of course always standing by.

Just "....airborne place" is all that is needed. None of which is in AIP anyway.... just one of those calls that has been passed on over time.


Duke... you are showing your age. The practice you refer to is called "offering" in which you give ATS time to pick up their pen or mouse. Pre TAAATS it was the done thing to just go straight ahead, except perhaps on HF if comms were not that good. Most good ATC and FS (boohoo) officers would always get it first time. Far less chat than now with the offering now written into the AIP as a result of TAAATS. Operator we were told needed time to get your electronic stip on the screen so as to process the info there directly. Also told that it would be only in place during TAAATS intro so training would be easier, but like other things as stuck.

Much the same as the provision of first ETA with departure call. Can you think of a worse time to put your head down and work out the first ETA. Call was needed to verify TAAATS info. Should have been at top of climb where there is a call anyway.....
triadic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.