Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

C150 Stall Warning Test - It Sucks!

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

C150 Stall Warning Test - It Sucks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2004, 12:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Menen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
C150 Stall Warning Test - It Sucks!

Tried to check the operation of the stall warning vane in the port wing of a Cessna 150. Slipped off the bloody ladder twice. Climbed up for the third time and blew into the apeture in the leading edge of the wing. Nothing happened. Placed a hankerchief over the slot and this time sucked. The stall warning actuated. So how come if the dynamic airflow hits the leading edge of the wing where the stall warning system is installed, you have to suck not blow? I thought that at the stalling angle of the wing, the air would angle into the slot not get sucked into the slot? Please explain?
 
Old 25th Oct 2004, 13:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Menen,
Draw yourself one of those classic streamline drawings with the wing at an AoA of about 13 deg. You should wind up with the relative airflow broken into a stream passing over the upper surface and another stream passing under the wing. The place where the hole is in the leading edge on the C150 should be neatly in between these 2 streams. There is an area right in front of the 'nose' of the wing which is now in a lower pressure than the ambient or 'static' pressure. Thus there is created a net flow OUT through this hole, and also through the noise-making device. At lower AoA's of course, the hole is being subjected to the flow passing under the wing.

It may seem crude, but it doesn't rely on any external power to make it work and it's REALLY easy to check. The key thing here is to check that the path hasn't become obstructed, by insects, etc. I must admit I've never been hygenic enough to use a cloth when testing it, though! (Is that something to do with hiding our money under the soap?) Perhaps I will in future, having recently read about the person who died when they were stung in their mouth by a wasp that had gotten inside their drink of Coke.

Cheers,
TheOddOne
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2004, 13:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Think about where the LOW relative pressure is going to be approaching the stall.
I might add, don't EVER blow into anything on an aircraft. It could get very expensive for you.
You sound like you might need to have a yarn with your instructor to clarify a few basics.

I got pipped at the post it seems.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2004, 15:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how come if the dynamic airflow hits the leading edge of the wing where the stall warning system is installed, you have to suck not blow?

Kinky ...
Hempy is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2004, 20:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
Menen, how tall are you? I don't know ANYONE who has to climb a ladder to get to the C150 stall warning port.

By the way the real reason for using a cloth is to avoid giving the aircraft herpes.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2004, 21:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gday Sunfish

The reason I use a hankie I don't want a mouth full of the huntsman that decided camp in there.

Cheers Q
QNIM is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2004, 11:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 261
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason I use a hankie I don't want a mouth full of the huntsman that decided camp in there.
Or the wasp I saw one FI inhale!!!

I believe he learnt his lesson
Dookie on Drums is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2004, 11:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Menen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Merci beaucoup everyone. Love the replies and the humour. If it is an Aerobat and flying upside down in level flight would the stall warning still suck and not blow?
 
Old 26th Oct 2004, 12:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Devil

Um.... I don't think you could get an Aerobat to fly inverted in level flight... the donk would stop...


Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2004, 14:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just because the engine's not running doesn't mean you can't do it (for a while at least)!

The whole system sucks, especially when it's working
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2004, 05:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 496
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
even funnier when you go down to the aircraft and see the student you have never flown with before but eveyone wants to, sucking on the pitot tube thinking its a stall warning......
Bula is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 20:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back ne forth
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Education for all! I didn't know some C150's had suction type stall warners, I've only ever seen 150/152's with vane type warners.
You learn something everyday.
manamana is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2004, 23:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That's interesting. In the thousand odd hours I have in C150s/152s I've never seen one with an electric vane type. All were suction.

How odd...
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2004, 02:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Established.
Age: 53
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have never sucked on one and never will. Just checked it was clear and unobstructed. How is anyone going to know?

Please don't reply that I didn't satisfy the requirements of a daily inspection because I don't care.
The Messiah is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2004, 03:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please don't reply that I didn't satisfy the requirements of a daily inspection because I don't care.
He's not The Messiah, he's a very naughty boy !
Hempy is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2004, 05:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 496
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
messiah you do realise you can use a tissue........

Why have a stall warning in the first place if you are not going to test it? For all the days when you will never hear it or... the day you are overworked, make an error, dont relise your approaching the stall and kill yourself close to the ground or you require a change of underwear....


save the underwear.. use toilet paper on the warning instead
Bula is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2004, 02:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another reason for using a tissue or other 'barrier.'

Preflighted a C152 at dawn on a clear Adelaide morning one July a very long time ago.

Frost on the ground, aircraft skin around O degrees C.

Preflighting pilot leaves a bit of his lips stuck on the leading edge!

Ouch!

ITCZ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.