Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Mecir + Se Nvfr = Me Nvfr ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Aug 2004, 07:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Another Desert
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Mecir + Se Nvfr = Me Nvfr ???

Can someone explain why this equation does not work???

If you hold a current ME CIR and a SE NVFR, then you can fly a ME at night....as long as you're CIR is current and you satisfy the night recency requirements.

BUT...

If you hold these qualifications you do not qualify for a ME NVFR and have to complete a flight test.....and that flight test can be completed during the day....

From the NVFR section of the Flight Crew Licencing Industry Delegates Handbook found on the CASA website:

Section 8.5 (last bit)

Removal of Single Engine Aeroplane Restriction (Multi-Engine Upgrade)

........The test may be conducted at night or under simulated instrument flight conditions
And according to the 5 or so CASA licencing departments I spoke to today.....

Even though I have recently completed a ME CIR renewal, I would have to do another test to qualify for a "lower" rating, which is only needed for insurance purposes.

Anybody???
giddy up is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2004, 07:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In Front of My PC
Posts: 188
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
I was under the impression that a holder of a ME CIR could exercise the privilege of a NVFR rating
Bill Smith is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2004, 08:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,103
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Your initial premise is wrong. A holder of a MECIR can fly ME NVFR. From CAO Part 40.2.1 subsection 14:


14 FLIGHT BY NIGHT UNDER NIGHT V.F.R. PROCEDURES

14.1 A particular grade of command instrument rating authorises the holder of the rating to fly an aircraft of the category concerned within Australia as pilot in command, or co-pilot, using the navigation aids endorsed in the holder’s personal log book in the following circumstances:

(a) Private and aerial work flights under night V.F.R. procedures provided the pilot meets the aeronautical and recent experience requirements applicable to a night V.F.R. endorsement.

(b) Charter flights under night V.F.R. procedures, provided the following aeronautical and recent experience requirements are satisfied: <snipped>
Ah, I think I see where you\'re coming from now. You\'re saying that although you can use your MECIR (you don\'t need a SE NVFR by the way) to fly NVFR, you don\'t actually hold a NVFR rating and therefore don\'t meet certain insurance requirements?

In that case you may have better luck convincing the insurance company that a MECIR is as good as a NVFR rating for their purposes.

(That last bit was added as a seperate post but it seems to have been merged into my first post.)
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2004, 12:05
  #4 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Giddy up...

Have a look at this thread.... http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...hreadid=130015

Have fun working for Jeeeerrrrry

Bill Smith & AerocatS2A ....

Ummm WRONG .....

An operator determins what a pilot will and will not fly, if they have an insurance requirement, its the operator who will roster a pilot to fly, not the pilot.

You can have all the ratings in the world, its still the operator who determins who flies what, they do run the compnay, have the contracts, pay the insurance, decided who they hire and fire.

My tip, dont argue with an operator if they have an insurance requirement, they will find someone else who does.
swh is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2004, 13:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,103
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Fair enough. There was nothing in the OP that suggested that there was an "operator" involved though. As far as I knew he could be wanting to fly his own aircraft at night and be having trouble with his insurance company.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2004, 16:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Years ago DofA/CAA/CASA/whatever would cancel the SEAO restriction ona SE NVFR if you held both the SE NVFR & a ME CIR. They did for me (automatically when my CIR was issued. I didn't have to request it), and I've seen it done for others automatically or on request.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2004, 09:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In Front of My PC
Posts: 188
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
SWH

Nothing saying an operator was involved!

The question posed was wether he could fly NVFR on a ME CIR without doing ME NVFR rating.
Bill Smith is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2004, 13:00
  #8 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Bill,

Soon as people mention the word insurance...I think operator, some one who is trying to cover their 6.

swh is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2004, 15:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall having a blue with my CP about this exact thing. We had a charter in the dry, 8/8ths clear sky, but would involve tour of duty exceeding twelve hours. Can we do it??
YES - Go VFR in the multi, with pax, extend the tour with a rest period and come in after dark, VFR IN VMC. I held a ME CIR and SE NVFR at the time.
This is perfectly legal, and a sore point with me 'cause a clown who is supposed to know better let the work float past on the breeze, and I missed out on a good job and some good hours...
Ah well that's life.

CR.
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2004, 08:21
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Another Desert
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I realise a ME CIR allows you to fly at night.....its the fact that CASA will not allow the SE restriction to be automatically lifted off the NVFR rating when one gains a ME CIR.....i just don't see the logic.
giddy up is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2004, 09:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: messemate way to bondi icebergs
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Counter-rotation

'cause a clown who is supposed to know better let the work float past on the breeze, and I missed out on a good job and some good hours...
I've never heard of an operator turning down a job cause they were not happy with the Flight/Duty times (right or wrong) restrictions. It is refreshing that there are operators out their that actually bother to forecast potential problems and say no to a job. Most operators that I have been in contact with book the job then worry about what rules will be broken
drshmoo is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2004, 10:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
M/E NVFR

Hi Giddy, up, I was in the same situation as you, I had a S/E NVFR then got a twin rating but cant fly the twin at night under NVFR. So the test was simply climbing to 1500ft having an engine failure at night then thats it, 0.3 and I had my M/E Night VFR rating. I think the reason you cant transfer is that you havent experienced an engine failure at night so its not automatic. As for M/E CIR yes you can excercise priveleges of NVFR but without going back into the books, I know there is a catch there, you at least need your S/E NVFR to have the required experience to do it, and there are recency points as well. So if you havent done S/E NVFR it is almost impossible to do it. Dont ask me for a reference Im going several years back, but I know there is something. But if ya want a M/E NVFR rating its a piece os pi$$ to get! cheers!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2004, 13:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did anyone see the NVFR quiz in the last flight safey?
Question 2
The answer is on the next page,This may confuse people a bit more.
bush mechanics is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2004, 03:30
  #14 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I was under the impresion that simulated emergency procedures/engine failures were verboten in the dark.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2004, 05:42
  #15 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Wiz,

Simulated emerg okay 1500 ft AGL, in the AIP

swh is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2004, 16:39
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
AoA, not quite correct. You don't *need* a N.VFR rating to gain N.VFR privileges on a CIR. You *need* a certain amount & type of flight under N.VFR.

That amount & type is pretty much the same as what one would get if one did a N.VFR however there's no requirement to do a test.

The disadvantage of not doing the N.VFR rating ie relying on CIR N.VFR privileges is that those privileges disappear with when the CIR lapses. A N.VFR rating is permanently valid.

Giddy up, as I wrote earlier DoA/CAA/CASA used to do this automatically. If it didn't happen automatically then you could front up to the office & they'd do it on request. Have you tried going in person & speaking to an FOI about it?
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2004, 12:40
  #17 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

swh alright for those of you who have nothing better to do than read the AIP's. I can't keep up with the amendments and I have no intention of being an instructor and I already have the rating, so that one slipped by me.
the wizard of auz is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2004, 01:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
drshmoo

I'd never heard of it either, particularly when the supposed breach of F&D didn't actually exist (some people however have egos which don't permit them to be corrected by a "lesser" person).
But my point was not about F&D anyway, but the distinction between ME NVFR (under a ME NVFR rating) and ME NVFR under the privilege of a ME CIR. As has been said here many times, and I'm sure you know: CAO 40.2.1 Sec 14

Sorry for the late reply...

CR.
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2004, 18:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A significant point: A N.VFR rating is *NOT* able to be used for N.VFR charter not matter how many engines the a/c has. Aerial work, yes, but not charter.

Night VFR procedures, using the N.VFR privileges of a CIR is the only way to do it.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2004, 14:06
  #20 (permalink)  
Bugsmasherdriverandjediknite
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bai, mi go long hap na kisim sampla samting.
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I thought Night VFR charter was allowed.......if the pilot was the holder of a current MECIR and the charter was conducted in a multi engined aircraft.
the wizard of auz is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.