Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Higher fees a 'threat' to secondary airport service

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Higher fees a 'threat' to secondary airport service

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2004, 16:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Townsville,Nth Queensland
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Higher fees a 'threat' to secondary airport service

Fri "The Australian"

Higher fees a 'threat' to secondary airport service
By Steve Creedy
July 02, 2004

AIRSERVICES Australia has been warned that plans to raise fees significantly at controlled secondary metropolitan airports threaten the viability of general aviation and will drive out operators.

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association has negotiated a 14-day extension for submissions on the proposal and is urging industry members to have their say by the revised July 14 deadline.

The concession came after a meeting between AOPA president Ron Bertram and Airservices chief executive Bernie Smith.

Airservices is proposing to increases fees at secondary airports with control towers from a $7.42 terminal navigation charge to as much as $164.22 a tonne.

The new charges would see per tonne fees of $86.11 at Archerfield, $57.10 at Bankstown, $59 at Essendon, $45.46 at Moorabbin, $100.40 at Parafield and $41.14 at Jandakot. They would come into effect over a five-year period and will be subject to approval by the competition regulator.

Airservices is also proposing raising the charges for aviation fire fighting and rescue services.

AOPA says the move threatens services to regional communities, and emergency services such as air ambulances and rescue helicopters.

Regional airlines are also upset, with one estimating the fees could add up to $1 million a year to costs.

Mr Bertram said many businesses indicated they would have to move or abandon operations if the pricing structure went ahead. The general aviation industry was already under siege from increasing rental costs and the Government's "haphazard approach to aviation policy and airport sales". "The real issue is that the Government is dropping the subsidy. If the Government does this, it is going to take away the aviation infrastructure in the country."

========================================
Wirraway is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2004, 00:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to see AOPA in the news - and not about another President resigning

Good work Ron and Team
poison_dwarf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.