Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Pilot background checks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2004, 15:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: MiddleEast
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what you are all saying is that our so called permanent license is now only going to be a 2 year license and $200 to boot..........I DON"T THINK SO.

Have a nice day
Rabbit is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2004, 16:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
To qoute from the DOTARS press release

The cost of background checking and the photographic licence will be borne by individual pilots. Licences will be valid for two years and will cost around $200.
After reading it again. I think thats what they want. 'spose it helps pay for the new look CASA. Would be good if it come with some of the things they took off me back in the 80's like my mappacks and VFG and ANO's and FSU's and ..
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2004, 20:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Queensland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahem. I thought my Licence said it was granted - in perpetuity- and could only be revoked if I broke the law ie CAR's etc. My Medical I need to renew every two years ( yes, I know, a lowly PPL) but my licence...never.
What law am I supposed to have broken to have them revoke my Licence so that I need to get it renewed?
Mixture Rich is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2004, 05:39
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The frustrating thing is we are virtually powerless to do anything. The public will think it's a great idea. How liitle they really know!
Aviation needs to get the public on its side.

Paint this as the thin edge of the wedge. First it'll be pilots, then truck, bus and ordinary motorists all being subjected to 'background' checks
ugly is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2004, 15:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Aviation needs to get the public on its side
In the USA they have this great organisation called AOPA. It rallies the media (and subsequently the public) on various issues that interest the entire pilot body . They managed to get similar proposals in the US paid for by the gov't.

Wouldn't it be good to have such an organisation here.
compressor stall is online now  
Old 6th Jan 2004, 06:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: The Coast of Sunshine, Australia
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stally you are right of course.

Unfortunately there are those who see membership of AOPA as being below their (perceived ) dignity as professional (licence held not attitude) pilots.

Most of the 'rubbishing' comes not from the membership but from outside the organisation. Heaven forbid doing something positive like joining AOPA and actually getting involved in these 'stouches' with the bureaucrats of this world.

That is, rather than sitting oustide snipping away and expecting somebody else to do your fighting and dirty work for you!

Oh and by the way, AOPA are onto this licence/police check/$200 piffle anyway. And yes, the result will be either enjoyed but probably ignored if we win but listen to the howls (of the non-members naturally) if we don't.

Disco Stu

Disco Stu is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2004, 21:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
disco stu
ok fine aha
now lets just get on with it and work the problem shall we
there is a rather unjustified cost increase in our industry.
can and will AOPA do something ? ? ?
can ALL pilots (AOPA or not!) do something ?
where do we start ?
here?I hope so !


the only attack here is at the problem!!
maxgrad is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 03:42
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: melb.vic.aust.
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post "its time"................

Never voted labour in my life, but...... it really is time to at least get rid of John Anderson. Any pilot who flies this moron around should pay the $200 for every other pilot in the country! Everyone in the industry should try to access as many pollies as they can. I currently have 17 15 and 16 year olds on Flightcamp and they are they are extremely responsible and are very much pro Oz. They are thoroughly disgusted with the governments' proposed charges. Will Air Force Cadets be subjected to the same charge? What about Defence Force personnel who also hold civvy pilot licences? Some companies already do police checks and bear the costs - $24 per person was the last price we were quoted. We need to hit every form of media we can.
tealady is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 04:09
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gday All

I agree, what a load of crap we have to put up with, if my company won't pay up I definately won't, if they do then up go the prices less punters learning, less GA, but maybe thats Johns plan.
Some posters have indicated that AOPA should get in there and do something, I agree, I hope those posters are members and all the others who are not join today .

Cheers Q
QNIM is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 04:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disco Stu:

I am a Professional Pilot and a member of AOPA.

Quite a number of Professional Pilots I know are also members so it's not an 'us vs them'.

Oh and by the way, AOPA are onto this licence/police check/$200 piffle anyway
IF AOPA is doing something about it, the time to make noise is now.

So far, no press releases, TV interviews or newspaper interviews (please correct me if there has been).

The only way to change this is to embarrass Anderson as he is reactionary.

If Howard was the T Minister then no chance as he would dig his heels in. Anderson will cave in under after a few breakfast TV interviews with AOPA and other industry reps.

AOPA can take a leaf out of the Kooky Greens book. Bombard the airwaves to get noticed. They get FREE airplay because they make noise).

Watch the membership numbers climb if AOPA starts stirring the pot publically.
Rich-Fine-Green is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 04:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OZ
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gday All

I agree, what a load of crap we have to put up with, if my company won't pay up I definately won't, if they do then up go the prices less punters learning, less GA, but maybe thats Johns plan.
Some posters have indicated that AOPA should get in there and do something, I agree, I hope those posters are members and all the others who are not join today .

Cheers Q
QNIM is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 05:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ronnie Bertram......how about making some noise on this?
bigfella5 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 16:22
  #33 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,976
Received 104 Likes on 59 Posts
Does anyone else get the feeling that some (if not all) of the shiny bums in Canberra have totally lost the plot? Talk about the inmates running the asylum!!
I sincerely hope that AFAP as well will have something to say about this latest piece of lunacy.

You only live twice. Once when
you're born. Once when
you've looked death in the face.
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2004, 23:06
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Downunda West
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK - Im an AOPA member - I dont know any pollies and I dont want to pay this stupid #&$^ing check/tax.

What can I as an individual do to help the cause? I do have a couple of mates in the media (albeit the wrong dept.) who may be able to find a sympathetic ear .

Any ideas people?
Captain Flak is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2004, 10:15
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Write your local member. Biggest problem is aviation as a community of voters does not have the critical mass required to make MPs get nervous enough to get off the back bench and make enough noise to save their collective arses. Food for thought, your one letter could be enough to tip the balance in favour of getting something done. Done my bit, wrote to little johnny and my local member. Still waiting for a reply.

Regards

Mark
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2004, 10:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haunted House
Posts: 296
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Petition?

Just received by email a petition re the new airspace. Some of you may have seen it too. Generated on a site designed specifically for that purpose (sorry don't have the address now
The same tactic could work here, maybe? I don't think there's a pilot in the country who wouldn't sign it!! Many others would too I'm sure.
Would someone out there not paying per minute for online time like to examine the possibility?

Yes it's ridiculous
Yes it's the thin end of the wedge
Tell 'em all to GO AND GET... well, you know.

CR.
Counter-rotation is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2004, 18:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cairns
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about banner towing

And so after paying my $200 to these money hungry, non starving, never been at the bottom of the pile pigs, will I be able to earn some money flying a &*^$ing banner around Brisbane city, or will I still be untrusted.

Thanks CASA.
Skyway is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2004, 05:06
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The background check is another example of the mindless paranoia that's come out of the USA. It will certainly reduce unemployment, but have no effect on security standards.

What about applying the same standards, cost and fequency of renewals to:

Cabin crew, airport ground staff, fuel tanker drivers (nationally - not just at airports), refinery and gas plant employees, groundsmen at sporting venues (just in case they plant a bomb under the cricket pitch). The list goes on and on.....

These "rule-makers" need to stop and take stock of what they are doing and go tell the USA to find out why the other half of the world hate them so much.
Ovation is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2004, 06:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 40
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Ovation,

I hold an FAA PPL (as well as my Aust. RPPL) and even though I'm a foreign national (Australian citizen living in the USA), I haven't been subjected to any background checks. So this particular piece of stupidity is not coming from the US. All I can think is it's another bit of revenue raising because only "rich" people can afford to fly aeroplanes ... so what's another $200!

Well, for me it's $200 less that I'll spend on flying.

I've sent my letter of protest to my local member and to Mr. Anderson. Still waiting for a reply.

H
cirrus32 is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2004, 06:40
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Darwin, Mostly.
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Security Checks?

How many does a guy need?
Because I have a passenger endorsement on my drivers licence, I have to have a police check every renewal, $24.
Because I have worked in mine areas I have security clearance and a police file, still current.
Because I have worked in defence security areas, I have an ongoing security check, including I believe an FBI file from past associations with the US military establishment.
Now these clowns want me to pay for yet another security check, and it's the most expensive of all. What a crock!
How many of these little bureaucratic wallies does it take to check you out? Can't they talk to each other and find out if you are already cleared to WAAAAAAAAY higher than they'll ever want for their little scheme.
With all these clearances I need, they'll be tripping over each other to get to my records and probably never grant any of them again!
Pharcarnell is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.