PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Iran (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/586655-iran.html)

Less Hair 22nd June 2025 10:24

Fordo post strike sat image (AP):

https://apnews.com/live/israel-iran-war-updates

NutLoose 22nd June 2025 10:34


Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds told Sky News that Britain was notified as a key ally, though he didn’t know the actual timing. He said the U.S. did not ask for support and Britain was not involved.

“Whilst the British government, the U.K., has not been involved in these attacks, we have been making extensive preparations for all eventualities,” Reynolds said.

He said the government was working on how to look after British nationals as well as its military bases, personnel and infrastructure in the region.
Putting an ad in the Oxford Mail for a man with his own bicycle to carry out roving patrol tasks at Brize Norton?

dead_pan 22nd June 2025 10:59

I for one will grudgingly admit that Trump played us all with his 'two weeks' ploy. Also there was a nice bit of misdirection by with reports that the B2s were positioning to Guam.

As for Iranians, they never fail to miss an opportunity. I'd be saying that the facility was heavily damaged, rescue efforts were underway etc etc.

Andy_S 22nd June 2025 11:01


Originally Posted by jolihokistix (Post 11908280)
And there you have it. Giant ego time. Iran officials have just stuck out their collective chin and said, "That didn't hurt! What else you got?"

Asking for it, or what?

Exactly this.

If, hypothetically, Forno was relatively undamaged, I think I'd be keeping very quiet about it rather than giving the Americans a reason to come back for more.


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11908385)
The Houthi’s have declared war on the US, I wonder how many other Arab states will also join in.

My guess is precisely zero.

TWT 22nd June 2025 11:33



RAFEngO74to09 22nd June 2025 12:32

Brief by Sec Def & Chairman JCS

7 x B-2A with 14 x GBU-57A/B + large escort/SEAD package of 5th & 4th Gen fighters.
No Iranian SAM launches detected on way in or out.




Lonewolf_50 22nd June 2025 12:36

How does the government of Iran massage this into garnering more support from the general population? "Us against them" can be an effective messaging tool. I've seen a few articles recently that Grand Ayatollah Khameini is reaching the end of his tenure, and the maneuvering has already begun to try and replace him.

Does this give him a new lease on life, politically?
Will the IRGC keep backing him? If they don't, who will they move their support to?

SATCOS WHIPPING BOY 22nd June 2025 12:44

https://iran.liveuamap.com/

A bit more information and timeline in this link for those who are interested.

Martin the Martian 22nd June 2025 12:48


Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09 (Post 11908506)
Brief by Sec Def & Chairman JCS

7 x B-2A with 14 x GBU-57A/B + large escort/SEAD package of 5th & 4th Gen fighters.
No Iranian SAM launches detected on way in or out.

I thought the whole point of the B-2 was that it wouldn't need an escort package?

ethereal entity 22nd June 2025 12:50

I recall watching a video called ‘Midnight Hammer’ on detachment. Different subject matter, although it did include massive penetrators…

Lonewolf_50 22nd June 2025 12:50


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11908278)
“The enriched uranium reserves had been transferred from the nuclear centres and there are no materials left there that, if targeted, would cause radiation and be harmful to our compatriots,” he told the channel.

I think the Iranian public needed to hear that the risks of contamination have been mitigated.

Originally Posted by SATCOS WHIPPING BOY (Post 11908513)
https://iran.liveuamap.com/
A bit more information and timeline in this link for those who are interested.

Looks like the Israelis are following up with more attacks this morning. FFS, when does this stop?

That's a neat tool/site you linked to there. Quite informative. :ok:

West Coast 22nd June 2025 13:34


Originally Posted by jethro15 (Post 11908209)
If you think that the UK and EU had NO part in this operation....dream on!

Jethro, seems your assessment is incorrect regarding UK involvement. Still waiting on clarification from you regarding EU involvement.

"Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds told Sky News that Britain was notified as a key ally, though he didn’t know the actual timing. He said the U.S. did not ask for support and Britain was not involved"

“Whilst the British government, the U.K., has not been involved in these attacks, we have been making extensive preparations for all eventualities,” Reynolds said.

Coupez 22nd June 2025 13:44


Originally Posted by Martin the Martian (Post 11908514)
I thought the whole point of the B-2 was that it wouldn't need an escort package?

B-2 was designed over 40 years ago for a different mission. Not needing an escort doesn't mean it's not prudent to use one.

B-1B was touted as a strictly nuclear bomber. They had to rip all the rotary launchers out and equip them with conventional bomb racks. Missions evolve over time.

Una Due Tfc 22nd June 2025 13:47


Originally Posted by Martin the Martian (Post 11908514)
I thought the whole point of the B-2 was that it wouldn't need an escort package?

Improvements to RADARs mean stealthy aircraft are not as stealthy as they used to be. Seeing them and hitting them are two different things obviously.

The B2 is 80s tech, although in all likelihood there are aircraft flying today that the public doesn't know about, remember how long it was before Blackbird and Nighthawk were publicly disclosed.

Mr Mac 22nd June 2025 14:22

I note despite Mr Trump protestations re total success the military are being more coy saying they are still awaiting better evidence on damage assessment. I have no knowledge of the use of these weapons but historically the RAF Earthquake bombs though effective did not always hit target the first attempts and indeed multiple raids required.

So for me show me some evidence before you start to say you have stopped the program. As for the retribution for there will be one,I would suspect a soft target like the bombings in East Africa and not tomorrow but in a time and place of Iranian choosing.

Regards
Mr Mac

langleybaston 22nd June 2025 14:29


Originally Posted by Mr Mac (Post 11908572)
I note despite Mr Trump protestations re total success the military are being more coy saying they are still awaiting better evidence on damage assessment. I have no knowledge of the use of these weapons but historically the RAF Earthquake bombs though effective did not always hit target the first attempts and indeed multiple raids required.

So for me show me some evidence before you start to say you have stopped the program. As for the retribution for there will be one,I would suspect a soft target like the bombings in East Africa and not tomorrow but in a time and place of Iranian choosing.

Regards
Mr Mac

Regardless of how severe, or very severe, the Fordow damage turns out to be, would Iran ever resume / continue work there? Death-wish. Trump would never allow such a propaganda victory. If Iranian enrichment is not halted for a decade, my c8x a cucumber.
Just checking for salad cream stocks.

B Fraser 22nd June 2025 14:45


Originally Posted by Mr Mac (Post 11908572)
I note despite Mr Trump protestations re total success the military are being more coy saying they are still awaiting better evidence on damage assessment. I have no knowledge of the use of these weapons but historically the RAF Earthquake bombs though effective did not always hit target the first attempts and indeed multiple raids required.

AFAIK, the raids on the Tirpitz saw strikes within 150m of the target, courtesy of a bomb sight. Todays bombs are GPS equipped and self-steerable to a point where the second bomb can pop down the hole created by the first.

Goanna01 22nd June 2025 14:46

How would you even assess the damage to a site the best part of a kilometre underground? I guess satellite images would be of limited use, do the weapons themselves have any sensors that send back info on how deep they detonated? Would the US be largely relying on intercepted Iranian reports of the damage?
Sorry for the civilian intrusion.

Andy_S 22nd June 2025 15:09


Originally Posted by Mr Mac (Post 11908572)
I note despite Mr Trump protestations re total success the military are being more coy saying they are still awaiting better evidence on damage assessment. I have no knowledge of the use of these weapons but historically the RAF Earthquake bombs though effective did not always hit target the first attempts and indeed multiple raids required.

So for me show me some evidence before you start to say you have stopped the program.

Given how effective Mossad have been at inserting agents into Iranian society, I guess it won't be too long before they know one way or another.

rotorwills 22nd June 2025 15:10

The size of the explosive charge is estimated to be effective with a 10m radius. Given that statistic it would be extremely unlikely that any major damage has been done to the deep underground facilities, unless one had precise accurate information. Trump hasn't a clue as to what the level of underground damage has occurred. Maybe someone in Iran has, but even that's unlikely as I'm pretty sure they all were evacuated.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:13.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.