PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Modern Structures on RAF Stations (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/657481-modern-structures-raf-stations.html)

chopper2004 8th Feb 2024 21:25

Modern Structures on RAF Stations
 
Laughingly I was reading Forces news on their visit to the Wyton's PAthfinder hub

https://www.forces.net/news/take-tri...MVe2ihohs6O9Pw

https://www.forces.net/sites/default...T%20MOD%20.jpg

and looking over the years looked at development of Lossie's Poseidon Strategic Facility

https://des.mod.uk/wp-content/upload...-0539-0012.jpg

and of course MArham's F-35B facility...

I guess we are catching up with our transatlantic and antipodean allies with modern aesthic pleasing structures.

Mind you i dug up a copy of Superbase 20: Baden Sollingen published in 1991 and interesting to see the then CAF 1st Air Division lair at CFB Baden-Sollingen maintenance hangar is almost whiter than white, (as with their US counterparts)

https://scontent-man2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...4A&oe=65CA77AA


https://scontent-man2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...6Q&oe=65CA6733
https://scontent-man2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...6g&oe=65CB3953

even back then, but from what I remember of going to RAF bases as a either CCF or ATC cadet at the time, dont recall our C type hangars inside being as bright...

cheers

Rigga 9th Feb 2024 07:53

...or as empty!
RAF Hangars were mostly WW2 historic structures built for Lancasters, at best, and were always stacked full of minor and major servicing. The hangar above looks like it was built to take the largest CAF aircraft possible - but is used for F18s. A bit like Timmy's Hangar at MPA - with a FIGAS plane in a corner.

Lomon 9th Feb 2024 08:09


Originally Posted by Rigga (Post 11593449)
A bit like Timmy's Hangar at MPA - with a FIGAS plane in a corner.

Isn't Timmy's hangar a bit empty because it was built to house a Tri* and the Voyager doesn't fit in there?

BEagle 9th Feb 2024 08:11

Correct! A point I made many years ago when comparing the offerings of TTSC and AirTanker.

The 767K would have fitted, the Voyager does not.

NutLoose 9th Feb 2024 09:15

what part does not fit?

ancientaviator62 9th Feb 2024 09:53

Would have loved to work in such a nice environment instead of the cold draughty hangars I worked in at Middleton and Leconfield !

57mm 9th Feb 2024 10:06

I assume modern structures on RAF airfields does not refer to married quarters.....

Krystal n chips 9th Feb 2024 10:53

When we arrived at the former GAF Leck, we were impressed to be ushered into a warm, immaculate hangar with a pristine shiny floor and advised it was the Avionics facility.

We were embarrassed when the very bent Gnat duly dripped its fluid contents over the floor...no idea how long the stains remained for, probably until the base closed.

BEagle 9th Feb 2024 11:50


We were embarrassed when the very bent Gnat duly dripped its fluid contents over the floor...no idea how long the stains remained for, probably until the base closed.
XS103 looked very sad indeed when I saw it later at RAF Valley!

Saintsman 9th Feb 2024 13:11

I hope that they are nicely heated. I remember Base Hangar at Brize when the Tristar did its bounce. It was in nose first for months over winter, with a staging cover. That meant that the doors had to stay open and as they were linked to the hangar heating, it was bloody freezing.

Biggus 9th Feb 2024 13:45

In about 2010 they constructed a new building at Kinloss, housing the new MRA4 simulator - so I presume this counts as a "modern" structure?

Within a couple of years the roof had blown off (peeled back) in a storm that had no real impact on the "old" structures.

I'm not sure what condition these modern structures will be in 50 years from now, but personally I have my doubts. Not that I'll be around to see...

NutLoose 9th Feb 2024 13:52


Originally Posted by Biggus (Post 11593744)
In about 2010 they constructed a new building at Kinloss, housing the new MRA4 simulator - so I presume this counts as a "modern" structure?

Within a couple of years the roof had blown off (peeled back) in a storm that had no real impact on the "old" structures.

I'm not sure what condition these modern structures will be in 50 years from now, but personally I have my doubts. Not that I'll be around to see...

The reason the old WW2 Hangar doors were double skinned was they used to be filled with sand to absorb blast when those nasty Germans dropped bombs on the place, these look like they are built to a cost and not to any protection standard.

trim it out 9th Feb 2024 14:40


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11593751)
The reason the old WW2 Hangar doors were double skinned was they used to be filled with sand to absorb blast when those nasty Germans dropped bombs on the place, these look like they are built to a cost and not to any protection standard.

Protection from who/what?

SLXOwft 9th Feb 2024 20:03


Originally Posted by Biggus (Post 11593744)
In about 2010 they constructed a new building at Kinloss, housing the new MRA4 simulator - so I presume this counts as a "modern" structure?

Within a couple of years the roof had blown off (peeled back) in a storm that had no real impact on the "old" structures.

I'm not sure what condition these modern structures will be in 50 years from now, but personally I have my doubts. Not that I'll be around to see...

Also the damage to the roof of the £70million A400M hangar at Brize during 2022's Storm Eunice.

NutLoose 10th Feb 2024 00:12


Originally Posted by trim it out (Post 11593790)
Protection from who/what?

if you use that argument, why build HAS?

pr00ne 10th Feb 2024 13:23


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11594111)
if you use that argument, why build HAS?

We don't, when was the last HAS built, 1984?

Null Orifice 10th Feb 2024 13:48


Originally Posted by trim it out (Post 11593790)
Protection from who/what?

Wind and rain for starters!

BEagle 10th Feb 2024 14:32

The hangars at RAF Chivenor when it reopened were modern, light, quiet and bright inside - the engineers couldn't believe their luck!

Chatting with a Luftwaffe chum on the way to lunch at their old dining area, we passed the workers who were digging the foundations for the new air terminal...

"If you'd only asked, we could have helped out with a few more craters", I told him, "....oh and if you find anything marked 'Air Ministry Property 1942', it's OK - we won't it back!"
"Ja! But at least we won't have to keep painting the new one every year!" he replied.
"Why do you have to do that"
"Ach, because when the paint fades, an eagle holding something in its claws appears!"

It seems that the original Nazi emblem had been etched into the brickwork and could only be removed by demolition, so they had to paint over it!

Shaft109 10th Feb 2024 19:13

Decrepit old C Types
 
It definitely something I've noticed especially on disused ex mil airfields that the C Type hangars have zero maintenance but don't seem to have much damage after bad storms.


isaneng 11th Feb 2024 11:51


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 11593512)
what part does not fit?

The end bits.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:36.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.