Originally Posted by Exrigger
(Post 11459071)
|
The MOD works on the basis that it is a law to itself. Precedents include its SCS confirming that issuing an order to suborn UK Military Airworthiness Regulations was lawful. A CS disobeying such an order was committing an offence. It even managed to pressure the HSE to continue with the prosecution of MBL in the face of unequivocal evidence that it was innocent of the charge. The rules are for little people.
|
A back-peddle is better than nothing at all. Move on and just do the job you've been given to do. Leave the wokery to the idiot Marxists.
|
Originally Posted by Auxtank
(Post 11459317)
A back-peddle is better than nothing at all. Move on and just do the job you've been given to do. Leave the wokery to the idiot Marxists.
|
Originally Posted by Clunk60
(Post 11459343)
it’s exactly that attitude that allows these w**kers to get away with breaking the law time and time again. If this isn’t a case of bringing the RAF into disrepute I don’t know what is. Wigston and Byford need to be held to account for their racism! Because that is what it was.
One for the Defence Select Committee maybe? Here you are;
|
Auxtank
I’m glad we agree. Thank you for the information, I already have Tobias Elwood’s details and will be contacting him to express in no uncertain terms how much harm has been done to the RAFs reputation, morale and operational effectiveness. As someone has already pointed out Wigston’s directed number one priority was sorting out the flying training debacle. |
Weasel words from Ben Wallace too. “ All those selected met the minimum standards” Undoubtedly true but what he does not say is that some of those not selected exceeded the minimum standards and despite this were not selected.
So mediocre candidates prioritised over good ones. The effect of this will ripple on though because every time you meet a female or BAME recruit from this era you’ll always wonder………..! This will have a negative effect in so many ways on anyone from the above groups who genuinely made the cut. |
When I was in the "FF" there seemed to be 2 camps in R&S....those who wanted to push BAME at all costs and realists. This wasn't a new issue, my time period was 14-17 so it was bubbling then....we were repeatedly briefed anything we were asked to do was PA not PD, and nothing as blatant as this.
2*s loading courses, that was a job done by a team of Cpls normally! |
I wonder if this discrimination was restricted to the initial recruitment and training environment, or whether it extended to ongoing career opportunities or even promotions? I haven't seen anything reported to indicate this, but one wonders if the rabbit hole goes any deeper.
|
Low, I would imagine the principle applies not only to pilots but all potential recruits and would extend to their entire careers. Limited by skin colour. I think Wigston did a lot of damage. I would never encourage my children to join up. Why join an organisation when you have the inherent disadvantage of being straight white and male?
|
BOTR
Can’t you see? This is all part of the master(can I say that?) plan. Clearly, the more WASPs who become disillusioned and give up, the sooner the ‘woke’ agendabendas succeed. Allegedly. 😉 |
Originally Posted by Low average
(Post 11459932)
I wonder if this discrimination was restricted to the initial recruitment and training environment, or whether it extended to ongoing career opportunities or even promotions? I haven't seen anything reported to indicate this, but one wonders if the rabbit hole goes any deeper.
|
Originally Posted by ASRAAMTOO
(Post 11459421)
Weasel words from Ben Wallace too. “ All those selected met the minimum standards” Undoubtedly true but what he does not say is that some of those not selected exceeded the minimum standards and despite this were not selected.
So mediocre candidates prioritised over good ones. The effect of this will ripple on though because every time you meet a female or BAME recruit from this era you’ll always wonder………..! This will have a negative effect in so many ways on anyone from the above groups who genuinely made the cut. |
Originally Posted by bugged on the right
(Post 11459934)
Low, I would imagine the principle applies not only to pilots but all potential recruits and would extend to their entire careers. Limited by skin colour. I think Wigston did a lot of damage. I would never encourage my children to join up. Why join an organisation when you have the inherent disadvantage of being straight white and male?
https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles...ours-profiles/ Just a reminder, in 2022 the RAF was 15.4% female and 3.5% from ethnic minority backgrounds. Now look back at that link again. There are 6 personnel listed - 3 are male and 3 are female (going by their appearance and name), then 2 are ethnic minority (by name and appearance). Thus not representative of the 84.6% males and 96.5% non-ethnic minority individuals that serve. Now here is the full 2023 King’s Honours list: https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/articles...list-2023-raf/ and https://www.gov.uk/government/news/t...ours-list-2023 - let’s look at the male/female spilt: CBEs : 1 male and 2 females
OBEs : 4 males and 4 females
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....9e73e68f9.jpeg It’s obviously a coincidence that 15.4% and 3.5% adds up to 18.9%…:E |
One was a staish of BZN (so fairly usual) and one raised £10k+ for charity (so again not unusual).
|
Well, if the below is true, then the discrimination may go much deeper. The difficulty would be in proving it.
|
Its not just the RAF.....
Royal Navy captains talk of pride at commanding training establishments (mod.uk) Just to save people looking, the RN OF5 cadre had a circa 91/9 male/female split. |
Perhaps women just do a better job than men?
|
Originally Posted by Ninthace
(Post 11461092)
Perhaps women just do a better job than men?
|
You will be lucky with the defcom address, I could not get my mail delivered. As for Ellwood, I sent a long message re Herc retirement and have never received the courtesy of a reply/acknowledgement - useless pillocks.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.