PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Tornado jets! (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/645384-tornado-jets.html)

olster 25th Feb 2022 12:25

You are very quick with the insults Mixdown. I am a U.K. taxpayer and voter so I am entitled to an opinion which is all that it is. The people that matter here are the citizens of the U.K. and should expect accuracy from elected officials. But rather than let this turn into the usual pprune ego fest I will let others contribute. You probably wouldn’t get the irony of calling others pompous on line.

Martin the Martian 25th Feb 2022 12:58

Like another minister recently, who confused the Black Sea with the Baltic Sea.

Mil-26Man 25th Feb 2022 13:04


Originally Posted by olster (Post 11190091)
It is not an inconsequential mistake if the armed forces minister cannot even get the correct names of current British fast jets and quotes a redundant type. It demonstrates a mindset towards the military of the United Kingdom.

It is completely inconsequential. The man misspoke, end of story.

pr00ne 25th Feb 2022 13:06


Originally Posted by NAROBS (Post 11190150)
Obviously a symptom of COVID . . . . mis-spoke, mis-pronounce, mis -identify and, wait-for-it, miss the target . . and its catching.

Main object of HMG in these circumstances is to keep the collective assemblage of Brexitting-chest wallopers, Glastonberry rubber band wearers, Harry potter and Ariane Grande afficionados, shamrock air hells-bells tourist types, footballing delusionals nice and warm in their comfort bubble with lots of syrupy words that confirm their limited life experience.

Oh boy, are they in for a shock when Mr P and "Friends" pitch-up at Calais !


I think you need help...

Ninthace 25th Feb 2022 13:23


Originally Posted by Martin the Martian (Post 11190197)
Like another minister recently, who confused the Black Sea with the Baltic Sea.

Or an ex POTUS that confused Russian and American amphibious forces, also on the Black Sea?

Vortex Hoop 25th Feb 2022 13:24


Originally Posted by olster (Post 11190161)
This is absolutely not pointless. A government minister should be on top of his brief; the devil is in the detail. Our front line fast jet squadrons comprise typhoons and F35s. If you are armed forces minister and you either don’t know that or you allow your spad / civil servant write your speech, uncorrected for crucial detail you are not on top of your job. Sure, it may have been an error written in the heat of the moment. However the RAF / RN crews who are front line, highly trained personnel can only feel undermined by this lack of technical understanding. Maybe it’s just me.

Fully agree. These highly paid ministers should be able to keep on top of very very very basic details, like the names of our frontline fast jets.

There are only 2 of them left now!!

(I hate the way that some posters here like to shout others down by saying "I'm on the front line and I do/don't think what you said matters". This is an anonymous forum so no claims to authority can be made.)

Vortex Hoop 25th Feb 2022 13:26


Originally Posted by NAROBS (Post 11190150)
Obviously a symptom of COVID . . . . mis-spoke, mis-pronounce, mis -identify and, wait-for-it, miss the target . . and its catching.

Main object of HMG in these circumstances is to keep the collective assemblage of Brexitting-chest wallopers, Glastonberry rubber band wearers, Harry potter and Ariane Grande afficionados, shamrock air hells-bells tourist types, footballing delusionals nice and warm in their comfort bubble with lots of syrupy words that confirm their limited life experience.

Oh boy, are they in for a shock when Mr P and "Friends" pitch-up at Calais !

Oh dead - another pop at Brexit eh?!

You lost, get over it. Bigger fish to fry now.

(The EU have refused to kick Russia out of Swift payments while the UK/US are trying to. Where's the EU's moral compass now?)

pr00ne 25th Feb 2022 13:30

I watched the speech live, and did do a double take at the outset at the use of the word Tornado! But that aside it was a very good speech by a guy I have to confess I have not heard of before, and the subsequent exchanges were of equal quality, showing a good unity across the house.

melmothtw 25th Feb 2022 16:02


(The EU have refused to kick Russia out of Swift payments while the UK/US are trying to. Where's the EU's moral compass now?)
Of course, had we still been in the EU we would could have provided that 'moral compass', but as you say, that ship has sailed.

Jetstream67 25th Feb 2022 16:03

At least no one has mentioned Spitfires and Lancaster's yet

Haraka 25th Feb 2022 16:05

Thinking back a few years IIRC the RAF's own on line advertising site had pictures of Tornadoes after the type was OOS.
Some contracted advertising guru using his" Ajiffniff." ?

Kiltrash 25th Feb 2022 17:33

Regardless of the miss type what are the ' Tornadoes ' actually doing? Flying over Ukraine and oif so what do they do if they spot a Red also over a Ukraine. ..??

DogTailRed2 25th Feb 2022 18:59

How about Tiger Tanks?
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....75bc78e775.jpg

trim it out 25th Feb 2022 19:25

Poor bloke has probably been briefed to death the last few days, working hard on capacity and he went back to a core memory regarding Tornados (which were in service in the same place doing a similar task probably when he was serving) rather than Typhoons during a speaking part in a stressful situation.

Must be ace being perfect like some of the stone throwers on here. Good job we have a just culture now.

pr00ne 25th Feb 2022 19:48


Originally Posted by Kiltrash (Post 11190366)
Regardless of the miss type what are the ' Tornadoes ' actually doing? Flying over Ukraine and oif so what do they do if they spot a Red also over a Ukraine. ..??

They were mounting CAP over Romania. Part of a NATO wide series of CAP's right across the eastern borders.

tartare 25th Feb 2022 20:17

So what do you think people serving would have thought when they/if heard that minor error by a `busy' politician?


pilotmike 25th Feb 2022 20:18


Originally Posted by olster (Post 11190109)
It should be expected that ministers demonstrate ministerial competence and get the facts right.

Pure comedy! Do you think somebody ought to mention this to Boris. I haven't seen any evidence of this pesky requirement troubling him too much!

Auxtank 25th Feb 2022 20:20

*Ring Ring, Ring Ring . . *

"Hello?"

"Hello, could we speak to Vladimir Putin, please?"

"Ah, yes, of course, that's fine - can I ask what it is in connection with please?"

"Yes, This is the 1970's and we'd like our Outdated Imperialist Dogma back . . ."

"That's fine. I'll see if he's available."

Years later . . .

"Hello, Caller - he is not available. He is in yet another Steroidal fight with his faceski. Too make it look youngski."

"That's okay, we'll wait . . ."

trim it out 25th Feb 2022 20:21


Originally Posted by tartare (Post 11190483)
So what do you think people serving would have thought when they/if heard that minor error by a `busy' politician?

I thought "I know what he meant".

pilotmike 25th Feb 2022 20:24


Originally Posted by olster (Post 11190161)
Maybe it’s just me.

You keep repeating "Maybe its's just me", apparently either to drum up some support in sympathy, or possibly to soften the blow when you finally get the message that, yes, everybody else is confirming that not only it is just you, but that it is possibly the daftest bit of moaning they've heard for a long time. I'd stop digging.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:08.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.