PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   RAF Female Hair Policy (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/641917-raf-female-hair-policy.html)

chopper2004 2nd Aug 2021 16:16

RAF Female Hair Policy
 
What with Space Command established and now this :)


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....90a3a3f12f.jpg

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....67d9cd6c0b.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d843e9f131.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....8578acd804.jpg


downsizer 2nd Aug 2021 16:36

Couldn't give less f*cks.

Standby for comments from people long out how this erodes the service, etc, etc...

Bob Viking 2nd Aug 2021 17:06

May the Lord save our souls.
 
How on Earth can they be expected to do their jobs with such abominations on their heads?

Oh, wait a minute. It won’t make the blindest bit of difference will it?!

Add me to the ‘it really doesn’t bother me a single bit’ list.

BV

KiloB 2nd Aug 2021 17:20

Bonedomes?

Timelord 2nd Aug 2021 17:31

I’m a fully paid up GOM and I don’t care. I just wish CAS and other VSOs would occasionally go on the record about “killing the enemy and breaking his stuff” as well.








Training Risky 2nd Aug 2021 17:44


Originally Posted by Timelord (Post 11088762)
I’m a fully paid up GOM and I don’t care. I just wish CAS and other VSOs would occasionally go on the record about “killing the enemy and breaking his stuff” as well.

True.

Lots of social engineering...not much aviation!

Standby for the first ponytail caught in an oleo...

ExAscoteer2 2nd Aug 2021 17:56

About time!

cynicalint 2nd Aug 2021 18:15

I can imagine some poor staff officer being tasked to lay down regulations for hairband colour, thickness, twist, scrunchie, material etc.
PS I don't care either...

ORAC 2nd Aug 2021 18:16


Bonedomes?
Ever hear of buns? Easier than a beard and a mask…


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....76287b433.jpeg


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....685302727.jpeg

ORAC 2nd Aug 2021 18:20

https://daydaynews.cc/en/military/638473.html


charliegolf 2nd Aug 2021 18:26

Can a man identify his hair as, 'female'?:E

CG

Ninthace 2nd Aug 2021 18:28

Long overdue!

ORAC 2nd Aug 2021 18:41


Can a man identify his hair as, 'female'?https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/evil.gif
No, but a lot of pilots can log it as “missing in action”…. :}

treadigraph 2nd Aug 2021 18:43

Hair to day, gone tomorrow...

charliegolf 2nd Aug 2021 18:59


Originally Posted by ORAC (Post 11088801)
No, but a lot of pilots can log it as “missing in action”…. :}

Toupee, sorry, touche!

CG

langleybaston 2nd Aug 2021 19:30

Slight and light hearted offer of a digression:
  1. regarding a Met Man at a very SW airfield, whose wig was not a tight fit, such that if he turned his head quickly, there was a lag of several degrees.
  2. and regarding one in the Vale of York who owned three, thus long, short [simulated haircut], medium, long, repeat.

Mine? They say that grass does not grow on a busy street, and I have to wear a hut in the sun, should it condescend to shine.

Less Hair 2nd Aug 2021 20:09

As everything seems possible could women legally be bearded today?

ICM 2nd Aug 2021 20:29

When on exchange with the USAF 50 years ago, the ladies often had much more hair on display under their hats than was permitted back home at that time. The world didn't stop spinning back then, and I doubt that it will now.

meleagertoo 2nd Aug 2021 20:29

This is all very well in theory for crabs who live at home and 5* hotels but how does it translate to squaddies living in mud-holes and under hedges? How is personal hygiene maintained with hairdos like that?

langleybaston 2nd Aug 2021 20:31

Interesting. The Rocks now have women .................

Herod 2nd Aug 2021 20:36

This GOM is all in favour, but I have one question. Can the men wear their hair like that if they want to? I'm old enough to remember "what's under the beret is yours. The rest is the Air Force's"

Bob Viking 2nd Aug 2021 20:38

Meleagertoo
 
Maybe the kind of girl that wants hair like that depicted isn’t the kind of girl that wants to sleep in a ditch?!

It’s far too easy for some to find problems when rules are changed.

I prefer to just roll with it. It won’t affect me in the slightest so why should I care? And no, I don’t think the guys should fight for the right to grow their hair equally long.

BV

ExAscoteer2 2nd Aug 2021 20:55


Originally Posted by meleagertoo (Post 11088839)
This is all very well in theory for crabs who live at home and 5* hotels but how does it translate to squaddies living in mud-holes and under hedges? How is personal hygiene maintained with hairdos like that?

Oh FFS! What an utter non sequitur logical fallacy.


NutLoose 2nd Aug 2021 21:27

And I thought it was going to be about beards ;)… nice to see a sensible policy being implemented.

cynicalint 2nd Aug 2021 21:58


This is all very well in theory for crabs who live at home and 5* hotels but how does it translate to squaddies living in mud-holes and under hedges? How is personal hygiene maintained with hairdos like that?]
It's not going to be compulsory regulations that everyone has to wear their hair like that - there is a choice!

Ninthace 2nd Aug 2021 23:19


Originally Posted by meleagertoo (Post 11088839)
This is all very well in theory for crabs who live at home and 5* hotels but how does it translate to squaddies living in mud-holes and under hedges? How is personal hygiene maintained with hairdos like that?

I seem to recall in the good old days of the Cold War, the Dutch managed :)
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...e35b50d4ed6bdd

SASless 3rd Aug 2021 00:18

I suggest more interest in PT Standards might be a priority over the length some of that hair shown by the OP's photo.


MPN11 3rd Aug 2021 00:50


Originally Posted by SASless (Post 11088917)
I suggest more interest in PT Standards might be a priority over the length some of that hair shown by the OP's photo.

Thank you! Tidy hair, however arranged, is OK with this old fart. But fat women (and indeed men) in uniform really pi$$es me off.

tartare 3rd Aug 2021 05:22

Just don't get it caught on the way out if you have to pull the yellow and black handle!

dervish 3rd Aug 2021 05:46


Originally Posted by SASless (Post 11088917)
I suggest more interest in PT Standards might be a priority over the length some of that hair shown by the OP's photo.

In fairness, I assumed they were models working for a PR agency contracted by MoD. After all, no serviceperson would wear their belt half-fastened.

Haraka 3rd Aug 2021 06:55

Among the many other howlers in todays ""Daily Fail" on line (e.g. Intentional Olympic Committee (IOC)) was this piece on hair policy ,including :
"In 2019, the RAF allowed bears, but they must be short and neatly trimmed"`

It looks like Paddington's in with a chance then........

Less Hair 3rd Aug 2021 07:11

German Bundeswehr ordered 74000 nets in 1971 to keep the (male!) recruits hair in place.
https://www.helmut-schmidt.de/aktuel...an-hair-force/

Barksdale Boy 3rd Aug 2021 09:48

74,000 nets for one recruit - wow!

Fatjoff 3rd Aug 2021 11:15

I'm more concerned with how the young officer is sporting the forage cap. Surely tilted to the right, not the left? Or have I been wearing mine incorrectly for 30 years?

Ninthace 3rd Aug 2021 12:35


Originally Posted by Fatjoff (Post 11089151)
I'm more concerned with how the young officer is sporting the forage cap. Surely tilted to the right, not the left? Or have I been wearing mine incorrectly for 30 years?

Well, since the lady next to her could well be the SWO, or so the cane and Tate and Lyle suggest, I am sure she will put her right.

For SASless and MPN11's benefit, a SWO can be any shape they like as their word is law and they do not have to run around, they have a whole Station at their disposal for that. A mate of mine was a SWO, he was not above telling the Stn Cdr off. As in, "It may be your Stn sir, but that is my grass so get off it!"

langleybaston 3rd Aug 2021 13:22


Originally Posted by Ninthace (Post 11088899)
I seem to recall in the good old days of the Cold War, the Dutch managed :)
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...e35b50d4ed6bdd

ReallY? The ones I saw didn't manage, that's for sure..

Pontius Navigator 3rd Aug 2021 13:29


Originally Posted by MPN11 (Post 11088929)
Thank you! Tidy hair, however arranged, is OK with this old fart. But fat women (and indeed men) in uniform really pi$$es me off.

Fatist

​​​​​​.

622 3rd Aug 2021 13:48


Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator (Post 11089222)
Fatist

​​​​​​.


Nope, I think I'm the fattest! :p

Union Jack 3rd Aug 2021 14:11


Originally Posted by langleybaston (Post 11088818)
Slight and light hearted offer of a digression:
  1. regarding a Met Man at a very SW airfield, whose wig was not a tight fit, such that if he turned his head quickly, there was a lag of several degrees.
  2. and regarding one in the Vale of York who owned three, thus long, short [simulated haircut], medium, long, repeat.

Mine? They say that grass does not grow on a busy street, and I have to wear a hut in the sun, should it condescend to shine.



Called Jabba?

Jack


dctyke 3rd Aug 2021 14:56


Originally Posted by SASless (Post 11088917)
I suggest more interest in PT Standards might be a priority over the length some of that hair shown by the OP's photo.

It used to really wind me up when junior ranks with weight issues were getting threats of been thrown out when there was plenty of evidence of more senior ranks “getting away with it”.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:43.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.