TopAces F-16s
 

https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-i...ces-1001351073

Israel in talks to sell F-16s to Canada's Top Aces

Israel's Ministry of Defense is conducted negotiations with Canadian company Top Aces, sources close to the matter have informed "Globes," for the sale of the Israel Air Force's IAF) 29 surplus F-16 fighter jets - with each jet selling for between $3 million and $4 million. General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcons were delivered to Israel in the early 1980s and over the past decade have been gradually phased out of service......

The Ministry of Defense's International Defense Cooperation Directorate (SIBAT) is responsible for the talks with Montreal-based defense contractor Top Aces, which specializes in the procurement of older fighter aircraft, which are used in training as "staged enemy aircraft) by air forces and navies. In this case, the F-16s could serve in maneuvers for the US Air Force, which signed a contract with Top Aces last year. The company also provides training services to the air forces of Canada and Germany and owns a fleet of SkyHawk and F-16 aircraft and has conducted more than 80,000 hours of training worldwide.

Top Aces have been talking about this for about 5 years now. They keep promising that’s it’s ‘just about to happen’ but it never has. I don’t know the truth data on it, but many believe it’s just a marketing ploy.

Typo or contradicting?

They dont own them atm, but seem to be looking at it like its a done deal they saying 'future aircraft F-16's'

Same ****, different year. To quote a good friend at the time in a certain US Embassy here in Europe; "If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck then it's Canadian."

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7f82ccedd5.jpg

In this case the quack came from an Israeli business news source stating talks were underway between the company and the Israeli Ministry of Defense's International Defense Cooperation Directorate (SIBAT), and quoting prices.

ORAC, that’s because it’s always been the Israeli F-16s that Top Aces have been trying to buy. I believe they are the PEACE MARBLE jets; Block 10 A/B models so super early models that are quite run down. As Duck Dodgers has pointed out, they’ve been trying to spin this story for years but it’s never happened.

With the rumors going around the buyer of the RAAF F-18's wants out after not securing any contracts maybe they might be up for them or more to the RCAF

EXACTLY this. So much evidence of their shell game exists so I am genuinely surprised that they are not persona non grata. It's their disingenuous marketing and almost complete apathy towards not being afraid of bending the truth that is the problem. Here's another example I've received from contacts dating from 2015.

As for the Block 10, PEACE MARBLE 1 jets they are broadly equivalent to a Block 15 OCU with UP performed on them too. Doug Masters would be quite comfortable in that cockpit.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....2319e198cc.png

The problem is not with Top Aces, the issue is they have been waiting forever to get clearance from the US to buy the airplanes. Its not dishonest marketing.

So you are saying it wasn't dishonest telling the UK MOD DE&S PT in late 2015 that they could demonstrate F-16s in the UK in August of the following year? Same messaging to the Budeswehr in Berlin, ditto the US Embassy in Rome, and at every trade show since 2014? I'd opine the company have known exactly what they have been doing especially as it's incumbent on Israel to apply for TPT from DoS, DoD/DTSA and not the buyer. Also, why would DoS, DoD/DTSA enable TPT to a foreign private entity whose ownership, profit structure, and ultimately leveraged capital is all foreign (non-US) owned? Will Ottawa issue the equivalent of a GOPEA with regards to these defense articles? Will LM even support those jets? Let's not even mention the entire DADS/Debenture Holder/Clairvest legal **** show of a few years back.

It is dishonest marketing. They don’t have the aircraft and yet they’re consistently pushing as if they do. It’s been going on for years now and it’s always just around the corner. They know the game, it’s marketing spin.

Which company was it about 10 years ago that was offering Flankers and double- digit SAMs while operating out of Iceland? They seemed like a credible bunch

Военно-воздушные силы России Ltd in one of their playful moods??

ECA Program were the firm in question; the Su-27s were meant to be coming from Belarus. They had big ambitions according to some reports

If I've done my googling properly, the firm (and if it was a different one, one of the directors had the same name as the Flanker-purchasing business) went into liquidation about a year after the story in the link above appeared.

The only reason they dont have the airplanes already is that the airplanes needed to be released by the US government, which required a US contract first. Chicken and egg.

Read the US government has been cock blocking them for years to protect American bidders.

The Americans may well have been blocking them. That’s not the discussion here. The discussion is that Top Aces have been economical with the truth. They don’t have the jets and they’ve never had the jets, yet their marketing is all about the jets; they’ve now lost credibility over this. If they just pulled all the marketing until the deal is through then announced it I don’t think anyone would have a problem.

That's just it, the reputational damage has already been done at both the corporate and governmental level. A wise marketing strategy would have been to wait until named as a prime contractor on a USAF program which would enable you to begin the acquisition process, then once the deal is agreed go public. As is, nobody will believe anything until the first jet is in the CONUS with a FAA N-Reg allocated. The business problem with the approach taken, beside the obvious, is everyone knows your solution to a market segment by signalling look at our bright-shiny 1978-1980 FMS year build aircraft. Furthermore, the potential caveats on TPT approval by DoS, DoD/DTSA may well state for CONUS use only which could cause further reputational damage.

Thats also exactly the point that Top Aces seem to be missing due to their dogmatic chasing of the F-16 story. They’re old Block 10 A/B models. Their competitors could work out running costs and quite easily price Top Aces out of the market as they can offer a more economical and technologically advanced solution.

https://www.skiesmag.com/news/top-ac...ary-air-fleet/

Top Aces secures approval for F-16 adversary air fleet

Top Aces has received approval to acquire and import up to 29 F-16 aircraft from an undisclosed country, the company confirmed Thursday.

The Dorval, Que.-based air combat training firm said in a statement that the Block 10 aircraft would be upgraded with its open architecture mission system and offered as a platform to support United States Department of Defense training beginning in 2021.

While Top Aces would not yet confirm the country of origin, Israeli media on Dec. 2 claimed the seller is the Israeli Defense Ministry. According to CTech, the F-16s are 1980s-era aircraft that were retired as of 2016, and the Defense Ministry’s export agency is overseeing the deal......

If the deal with Israel is confirmed, the F-16 jets would be added to Top Aces’ current fleets of Dornier Alpha Jets and Douglas A-4 Skyhawks, and initially based at the F-16 Center of Excellence near the company’s U.S. headquarters in Mesa, Ariz.

In October 2019, the company received an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract that will allow it to compete with Air USA, Airborne Tactical Advantage Company, Blue Air Training, Coastal Defense, Draken International, and Tactical Air Support for adversary air services at 12 U.S. Air Force bases.

Under the US$6.4 billion Combat Air Force Contracted Air Support (CAF CAS) contract, the Air Force can solicit individual tenders from those seven companies for advanced adversary air (ADAIR) capabilities as required, at 12 USAF bases. The contract runs until October 2024 and is estimated to involve between 40,000 to 50,000 flying hours......

Hmm not really, its a tactic as old as trade itself - lining up a customer or two before you have to fork out on the goods. If you've done any trade brokerage in your time you'd have done this all the time.

I'd have thought that this early model F16s would have been super-easy to acquire, and that Uncle Sam would have no problems with them moving between allies?