PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Northrop Grumman wins next generation ICBM (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/635369-northrop-grumman-wins-next-generation-icbm.html)

chopper2004 9th Sep 2020 09:51

Northrop Grumman wins next generation ICBM
 
40/50 year old Minuteman III ICBMs going to be replaced as Northrop-Grumman has contract to design and build next generation of ICBMs to replace the 400 odd scattered across three states in silos.

https://www.airforcemag.com/northrop...ild-new-icbms/

cheers

ORAC 9th Sep 2020 10:35

Northrop definitely seems on the way up and Boeing on the way down of late.

Asturias56 9th Sep 2020 17:53

Welllll - the US armed forces are as interested as anyone else in not having a sole supplier - Boeing get a good run you can bet LM or Northrop will get the next big contract

TTBH they have much the same capabilities and so it's just a matter of adjusting the spec to slightly favour one or other of the deserving - Boeing refused to bid as they reckoned it was going to Northrop anyway

Martin the Martian 9th Sep 2020 21:28

Was it Northrop Grumman's turn?

Fonsini 10th Sep 2020 10:10

I wonder if we will have the same go-around regarding the vulnerability of silo basing that we saw during development of the otherwise excellent (but very pricey) LGM-118A. Just my 2 cents but the money would be better spent on the Columbia class project, and Northrop is already getting more than enough moolah from the Air Force for the B-21, it’s time to give up the silo launched missiles and move on.

etudiant 10th Sep 2020 12:10


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 10881712)
Welllll - the US armed forces are as interested as anyone else in not having a sole supplier - Boeing get a good run you can bet LM or Northrop will get the next big contract

TTBH they have much the same capabilities and so it's just a matter of adjusting the spec to slightly favour one or other of the deserving - Boeing refused to bid as they reckoned it was going to Northrop anyway

Afaik they both used Aerojet as their rocket motor supplier, so when Northrop bought Aerojet, Boeing wanted to redo their proposal but the USAF refused to delay the competition.
The sad thing is that the Space-X example shows that the corporate overhead at least triples the cost of US aerospace products. Continuing such monopoly procurements is demonstrably the best way to minimize military purchasing power.


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:47.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.