Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Northrop Grumman wins next generation ICBM

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Northrop Grumman wins next generation ICBM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2020, 09:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,143
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
Northrop Grumman wins next generation ICBM

40/50 year old Minuteman III ICBMs going to be replaced as Northrop-Grumman has contract to design and build next generation of ICBMs to replace the 400 odd scattered across three states in silos.

https://www.airforcemag.com/northrop...ild-new-icbms/

cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 9th Sep 2020, 10:35
  #2 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
Northrop definitely seems on the way up and Boeing on the way down of late.
ORAC is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2020, 17:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,401
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
Welllll - the US armed forces are as interested as anyone else in not having a sole supplier - Boeing get a good run you can bet LM or Northrop will get the next big contract

TTBH they have much the same capabilities and so it's just a matter of adjusting the spec to slightly favour one or other of the deserving - Boeing refused to bid as they reckoned it was going to Northrop anyway
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2020, 21:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Was it Northrop Grumman's turn?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2020, 10:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder if we will have the same go-around regarding the vulnerability of silo basing that we saw during development of the otherwise excellent (but very pricey) LGM-118A. Just my 2 cents but the money would be better spent on the Columbia class project, and Northrop is already getting more than enough moolah from the Air Force for the B-21, it’s time to give up the silo launched missiles and move on.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2020, 12:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Asturias56
Welllll - the US armed forces are as interested as anyone else in not having a sole supplier - Boeing get a good run you can bet LM or Northrop will get the next big contract

TTBH they have much the same capabilities and so it's just a matter of adjusting the spec to slightly favour one or other of the deserving - Boeing refused to bid as they reckoned it was going to Northrop anyway
Afaik they both used Aerojet as their rocket motor supplier, so when Northrop bought Aerojet, Boeing wanted to redo their proposal but the USAF refused to delay the competition.
The sad thing is that the Space-X example shows that the corporate overhead at least triples the cost of US aerospace products. Continuing such monopoly procurements is demonstrably the best way to minimize military purchasing power.
etudiant is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.