PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Chernobyl. 9pm sky Atlantic (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/621276-chernobyl-9pm-sky-atlantic.html)

NutLoose 7th May 2019 18:49

Chernobyl. 9pm sky Atlantic
 
Heads up, new series first of five..

Very very good, watching it now, talk about buying their heads in the sand, what a shambles.

AnglianAV8R 7th May 2019 21:34

If the dramatisation of the actions in the immediate aftermath is accurate, then it certainly is a shambles. I see no reason to question the script, as the delay in ordering the evacuation of Pripyat is truly damning.
They simply had no plans for such a catastrophe and the Soviet system did its usual blinkered management of their version of truth.

In fairness, I'm not convinced we would do much better if such an extreme event were to happen.
We came close.... Calder Hall.

Harley Quinn 8th May 2019 00:06


Originally Posted by AnglianAV8R (Post 10465755)
If the dramatisation of the actions in the immediate aftermath is accurate, then it certainly is a shambles. I see no reason to question the script, as the delay in ordering the evacuation of Pripyat is truly damning.
They simply had no plans for such a catastrophe and the Soviet system did its usual blinkered management of their version of truth.

In fairness, I'm not convinced we would do much better if such an extreme event were to happen.
We came close.... Calder Hall.

Thought the fire was at Windscale/Sellafield?

chopper2004 8th May 2019 00:31

Sacrifice by Cap Parlier
 
Sacrifice

This worth a read by the the former USMC AH-1J pilot and Vietnam vet (also exchange officer to Fusiliers in HK before being shipped to Vietnam), and McDonnell Douglas AH-64 Test Pilot. From Le Bourget 89 to Helitech 89 ..the author befriended his counterparts in Mil and ended up being asked if he could help out one of the dying Mi26 Test Pilots who flew over the reactor , dropping concrete.

The author also worked for Raytheon and was briefly at then BAe Hatfield in mid 90s taking the 125 production to Wichita. He also has come up to IwM in 2000s to fly in Carolyn Grace’s Spitfire.

Cheers


Cheers



tartare 8th May 2019 01:21


Originally Posted by chopper2004 (Post 10465835)
Sacrifice

This worth a read by the the former USMC AH-1J pilot and Vietnam vet (also exchange officer to Fusiliers in HK before being shipped to Vietnam), and McDonnell Douglas AH-64 Test Pilot. From Le Bourget 89 to Helitech 89 ..the author befriended his counterparts in Mil and ended up being asked if he could help out one of the dying Mi26 Test Pilots who flew over the reactor , dropping concrete.

The author also worked for Raytheon and was briefly at then BAe Hatfield in mid 90s taking the 125 production to Wichita. He also has come up to IwM in 2000s to fly in Carolyn Grace’s Spitfire.

Cheers


Cheers



Downloaded to Kindle on the iPhone - next to read.

hunterboy 8th May 2019 05:10

There was a good reconstruction on YouTube a while back...looked pretty realistic.

BEagle 8th May 2019 07:16

A good programme indeed it was!

(Although on my rather ancient SD/RGB Sky system I thought that the picture quality and dialogue track weren't up to par).

AnglianAV8R 8th May 2019 07:35


Originally Posted by Harley Quinn (Post 10465826)
Thought the fire was at Windscale/Sellafield?

You're right. Calder Hall was the Magnox facility at Windscale that followed the original reactors.


Shaft109 8th May 2019 18:01

This film with period footage is a bit of an eye opener


An another really good drama with a n excellent performance by Ade Edundson (of Bottom fame)


charliegolf 8th May 2019 18:44

I clearly recall the time. I was at Fod Free Finn on my final tour before leaving the RAF. It dominated the Mess tv rooms for ages. It was grim, as I recall. Ten or twelve years later I was a primary head, and a charity asked wherther we could host 5 or 6 Russian children during the school day for a couple of weeks. They were shipping the kids over for cleaner air, and some decent feeding up, and frankly, for a bit of cheer. Of course I said yes. Bonus- I had a Slovakian parent who could speak a bit of Russian. Good old Mrs Dutko! (Gave her a job later.) We did it for a few years as I recall.

CG

PS: several heads said no. Tw*ts come in all jobs.

The Old Fat One 9th May 2019 13:48

It is very tempting to watch this and just point the finger at good ol communism. Problem is power (in the form of people) is always infinitely corruptible...in communism through party prestige and influence, in capitalism through filthy lucre. Were it not for little luck, and the moral courage and integrity of Sir John Cockcroft, Windscale (Sellafield) could have ended up as bad...with the same sort of consequences for Northern England. And there was no shortage of misinformation peddling by the Government of the day to boot. You might ponder why the name has been changed as well.

You can draw your own conclusions as to how we might wish to build and regulate nuclear power stations in the future, as we seem hell bent on going down that route.

PS

Oh yeah...and much of this "abuse of power/privilege" type behavior is present in Fukishima as well.

Most of this is easily found online in the form of official reports with little effort.

NutLoose 9th May 2019 14:09

What struck me in the first episode was the denial that anything bad had happened even when people were telling the senior person in the control room what they had seen and right up until he was puking up he was still in denial even though he had seen parts of the reactor spread out below the window.
I suppose the shock of it all would do that to an extent, but it sent people to their deaths.
The other was the plant manager in the fall out bunker who also was trying to pass the buck and then sending the guy who was telling him how it actually was up onto the roof to look down on the open burning reactor, I think that would have been a case of after you mate. That and the lack of basics like medicines, protective gear and geiger counters.

FakePilot 9th May 2019 14:52

Myself as well! (Got Sacrifice on my Kindle)

The Old Fat One 9th May 2019 20:51


then sending the guy who was telling him how it actually was up onto the roof to look down on the open burning reactor
Unthinkable isn't it...and yet...

Tuohy then ordered everyone out of the reactor building except himself and the Fire Chief in order to shut off all cooling and ventilating air entering the reactor. Tuohy then climbed up several times and reported watching the flames leaping from the discharge face slowly dying away. During one of the inspections, he found that the inspection plates—which were removed with a metal hook to facilitate viewing of the discharge face of the core—were stuck fast. This, he reported, was due to the fire trying to suck air in from wherever it could.

"I have no doubt it was even sucking air in through the chimney at this point to try and maintain itself," he remarked in an interview.

Finally he managed to pull the inspection plate away and was greeted with the sight of the fire dying away.

"First the flames went, then the flames reduced and the glow began to die down," he described, "I went up to check several times until I was satisfied that the fire was out. I did stand to one side, sort of hopefully," he went on to say, "but if you're staring straight at the core of a shut down reactor you're going to get quite a bit of radiation." (Tuohy lived to the age of 90, despite his exposure.)


Tuohy died on 12 March 2008, having never received any kind of public recognition for his decisive actions.[49] The Board of Inquiry's report concluded officially that the fire had been caused by "an error of judgment" by the same people who then risked their lives to contain the blaze. It was later suggested by the grandson of Harold Macmillan, Prime Minister at the time of the fire, that the US Congress might have vetoed plans of Macmillan and US president Dwight Eisenhower for joint nuclear weapons development if they had known that it was due to reckless decisions by the UK government, and that Macmillan had covered up what really happened. Tuohy said of the officials who told the US that his staff had caused the fire that "they were a shower of bastards".[61]

Like I said, brave men and corrupt, cowardly officials exist in all societies.



Ron Manager 11th May 2019 20:52

Coincidentally, I’ve just finished reading Serhii Plokhy’s ‘Chernobyl - History of a Tragedy’. A fascinating and detailed history of the whole sorry saga, which I can thoroughly recommend.

gamecock 12th May 2019 12:25

I'm halfway through it, some incredibly brave and dedicated people whose responses were hamstrung by the Soviet political system

NutLoose 14th May 2019 19:39

Just watched part two, blimey... Nice to see the realisation of the situation finally sinking in amongst the political caste.

Fluffy Bunny 20th May 2019 19:12


Originally Posted by BEagle (Post 10465993)
A good programme indeed it was!

(Although on my rather ancient SD/RGB Sky system I thought that the picture quality and dialogue track weren't up to par).

You'll have to come to the land of the Dumnoni and watch it in 4K and surround sound. ;)

Fluffy Bunny 20th May 2019 19:18

If the Americans had shared their development information it may never have happened in the first place. Remember post Manhattan project the UK was cut off from all nuclear "secrets" by the USA. Thus the rush job for weapons grade plutonium that led to the reactor being pushed beyond it's limits.

minigundiplomat 21st May 2019 07:04


Remember post Manhattan project the UK was cut off from all nuclear "secrets" by the USA.

Maybe they realised the UK intelligence community all seemed to be recruited from a hotbed of communist sympathisers, and getting a message to the Politburo was quicker via MI5 than it was via the GPO?

NutLoose 21st May 2019 23:18

Just watched part three, the make up effects of those poor souls dying was simply first class, and the funeral scene brought it home. It surprised me how many people knowing they would die were willing to step up to the plate to stop it getting any worse and at least the miners kept their hats on.

AnglianAV8R 22nd May 2019 11:29


Originally Posted by minigundiplomat (Post 10476158)
Maybe they realised the UK intelligence community all seemed to be recruited from a hotbed of communist sympathisers, and getting a message to the Politburo was quicker via MI5 than it was via the GPO?

Some would argue that it remains so to this day.

chopper2004 23rd May 2019 17:31


Dismal Scientist 24th May 2019 08:34

I watched all the episodes so far in one sitting yesterday evening. Pretty riveting television...well-produced, well-scripted and very well-acted. But I also got rather annoyed, as it is a work of almost complete fiction masquerading as an accurate historical account.

Clearly it was a catastrophic accident - but in reality the situation was never even remotely as apocalyptic as presented in the film...

There was never the any risk of a multi-megaton 'thermal' explosion that would have wiped out the entire western third of the USSR. There was a risk of a thermal explosion, but the concern was that it would kill and injure the people trying to contain the damaged reactor or that it would damage the other three reactors on the site.

The civilian population in Pripyat did not get severe radiation burns from gawking at the burning reactor...in fact it seems that these people had absolutely no immediate health effects (despite media reports to the contrary), and the long term health effects (thyroid cancer etc.) seem to have be much lower than anyone expected at the time. The only people who suffered severe radiation burns or acute radiation sickness were the staff for that specific reactor and the (very brave) people who were directly involved in the containment or cleanup.

The three (genuinely heroic) men who waded underneath the reactor building to help drain the water storage tanks were not on a suicide mission. Two are still alive, and the third died of natural causes (a heart attack).

There were no miners...in reality they used oil drilling technology to pump liquid nitrogen under the reactor, but then realized it was unnecessary and stopped the effort. Even if the core had melted through the the concrete base it would not have rendered the entire Dnieper watershed uninhabitable.

Finally, the other three reactors on the site were undamaged - once Reactor 4 was contained they continued to be operated (although the operators had to work limited shifts), and the entire site was only decommissioned in 2000.

I'm afraid I find it rather ironic that so much of the discussion in the media on this series consists of sanctimonious homilies on the terrible consequences of the communist system suppressing the truth, when the series itself contains so many deliberate and misleading untruths as to almost represent propaganda. False news indeed!

Shaft109 27th May 2019 14:36

Miners
 
"There were no miners...in reality they used oil drilling technology to pump liquid nitrogen under the reactor, but then realized it was unnecessary and stopped the effort"

There were, see my previous post video they brought them in from the mining areas of the USSR

Just This Once... 27th May 2019 16:57


Originally Posted by Dismal Scientist (Post 10478442)
But I also got rather annoyed, as it is a work of almost complete fiction masquerading as an accurate historical account.

There were no miners...in reality they used oil drilling technology to pump liquid nitrogen under the reactor, but then realized it was unnecessary and stopped the effort.

I'm afraid I find it rather ironic that so much of the discussion in the media on this series consists of sanctimonious homilies on the terrible consequences of the communist system suppressing the truth, when the series itself contains so many deliberate and misleading untruths as to almost represent propaganda. False news indeed!

The IAEA published all their reports, including a significant revision (INSAG-7) when the depth of the Soviet suppression of the truth became clear. The report referenced all its sources and included a copy of the real Russian report (plus a translation to English) that was never supposed to see the light of day; plus the bogus report that was actually submitted to the IAEA in its place.

As for the miners, well it is all true - nearly 10,000 were recorded as part of the liquidation team, according to the official records. The miners recruited from Tula were certainly amongst the first to the scene, ultimately providing 3400+ miners to the Chernobyl dig. Tula even has a statue that honours their bravery:


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d893c192fd.jpg

Regarding the Soviet cover-ups, Chernobyl was not the first major RBMK accident. The first was in 1975 in Leningrad. This cover-up was so effective that other RBMK operators did not know about it let alone the design weaknesses that were exposed - including the staff at Chernobyl.


In 1986, INSAG issued its report INSAG-1, which discussed the Chernobyl accident and its causes on the basis of information presented to the Post-Accident Review Meeting in Vienna in August 1986 by Soviet authorities. The new information now come to light has affected the views presented in INSAG-1 in such a way as to shift the emphasis to the contributions of particular design features, including the design of the control rods and safety systems, and arrangements for presenting important safety information to the operators. The accident is now seen to have been the result of the concurrence of the following major factors: specific physical characteristics of the reactor; specific design features of the reactor control elements; and the fact that the reactor was brought to a state not specified by procedures or investigated by an independent safety body. Most importantly, the physical characteristics of the reactor made possible its unstable behaviour.

Two earlier accidents at RBMK reactors, one at Leningrad (Unit 1 in 1975) and a fuel failure at Chernobyl (Unit 1 in 1982), had already indicated major weaknesses in the characteristics and operation of RBMK units. The accident at Leningrad Unit 1 is even considered by some to have been a precursor to the Chernobyl accident. However, lessons learned from these accidents prompted at most only very limited design modifications or improvements in operating practices. Because of lack of communication and lack of exchange of information between the different operating organizations, the operating staff at Chernobyl were not aware of the nature and causes of the accident at Leningrad Unit 1.
https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/public...ub913e_web.pdf

IcePaq 16th Jun 2019 14:27


Tankertrashnav 16th Jun 2019 17:14

I've heard plenty of good reports but I dont have Sky. I rather think the answer will be no but Is there any alternative way of viewing it?

NutLoose 16th Jun 2019 17:27

https://www.nowtv.com/watch/chernoby...iAAEgKtffD_BwE

free trial then cancel?

Lantern10 16th Jun 2019 21:55

I watched all five episodes yesterday here.
https://flixtor.to/watch/tv/4876850/chernobyl

oldmansquipper 17th Jun 2019 08:27

The 'real' Chernobyl documentary programme airs on Sky later this week. Perhaps there will be a different spin on it all?

Anyway well done sky for producing both the excellent series and the 'real' prog. - I doubt the Beeb would even acknowledge it happened if it didn't suit their current agenda.

Tankertrashnav 17th Jun 2019 10:29

Thanks for the help Nutloose and Lantern10 - I will give it a try.

Islandlad 18th Jun 2019 07:41


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 10465653)
Heads up, new series first of five..

Very very good, watching it now, talk about buying their heads in the sand, what a shambles.

Looking back on the original shambles is all very well. Nothing new was revealed. Take a look at the current shambles.

33 years on it does not take much research, online, to see that this is an ongoing problem.

The removal of hundreds of tonnes of radioactive metals into the world market is complete for now. Contaminated wood growing in the exclusion zones is still being cut. All being sold on the world markets. Probably at a very 'good' price.

If you want your alarm bells to ring do a few quick searches. Don't bury you head in the sand. That sand is very radioactive!

flash8 20th Jun 2019 20:14

Have lived the last decade or so in Russia, with some recent years in Ukraine, the realism of some of the scenes is outstanding, they must have had some pretty talented people working on that show to achieve that level of accuracy (everyday life in the 80's), however I'm not so convinced over the character portrayal but my Ukrainian friends say they have this spot on as well. It was a dark period, and it should have been portrayed as such but I don't feel that atmosphere, and I was in Russia during the late 90's... when everything was dark. But still, the series is enthralling,

AnglianAV8R 20th Jun 2019 21:24

I think it showed the very worst failings of communism. The denial mindset was staggering.

What really surprised me, was the apparent lack of understanding of the risks among the general populace, even the firemen, despite their connections with the nuclear plant.
Even my basic traing in such matters had me filled with horror at what unfolded. The dose rates, in roentgens, were the stuff of nightmares.
I am filled with admiration for the selfless courage of those who understood their impossible position and still did their best to cope with the consequences of the disaster.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.