PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   USAF looks for new ejector seat (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/619505-usaf-looks-new-ejector-seat.html)

ORAC 16th Mar 2019 06:25

USAF looks for new ejector seat
 
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...-eject-456612/

US Air Force begins search for Next Generation Ejection Seat


The US Air Force started a market assessment to identify potential sources for its Next Generation Ejection Seat.

The service is looking for a modern ejection seat replacement to be installed in a variety of aircraft, including the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon, F-22 Raptor and Rockwell B-1 Lancer, it says in an online announcement. The competition has not yet been officially opened and the USAF did not announce a date when it would start accepting bids.

Likely bidders for the forthcoming competition include Martin-Baker and Collins Aerospace, two of the US military’s leading suppliers of ejection seats.

The USAF wants a seat that can safely handle ejecting a pilot with a weight range of 62.6kg (138lb) to 153kg (337lb). Total weight includes aircrew nude weight, aircrew flight equipment weight and survival kit weight.

The USAF’s requirements specifies the seat should be able to eject at speeds up to 600kt (1,111km/h) and at altitudes from 0ft to 60,000ft. The recovery parachute’s vertical descent velocity should not exceed 1,380ft/min (7.01m/s), and should be steerable to a minimum turn rate of 20°/s.


Davef68 16th Mar 2019 15:19

Ears prick up in Oxfordshire

SASless 16th Mar 2019 16:14

You forgot about the size and weight of Men's Wallets and Ladies Purses in the new politically correct bonus happy USAF.

oldmansquipper 16th Mar 2019 19:50

SASLess. This competition has been 'ongoing' for some time. Some serious lobbying of USG has (allegedly) been going on in attempts to keep the contract 'in (Dons) house'. The following self explanatory open letter to Forbes Magazine makes very interesting (if you are that way inclined) reading. I believe it was published.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF FORBES - Martin-Baker

False news? Level playing field? Protectionism? - I couldn't possibly comment.


Lonewolf_50 16th Mar 2019 19:59

Is it too much to ask, ORAC, for you to use the correct terminology in your title?
You wrote: USAF looks for new ejector seat
The title is:
US Air Force begins search for Next Generation Ejection Seat
In the US, we call them ejection seats. Given that it's the USAF who is the topic of the article ...

Or were you in such a hurry to cut and paste that you could not be bothered to check for accuracy?
(Yeah, I have fallen afoul of that myself in the past ...)

CONSO 16th Mar 2019 20:34


Originally Posted by SASless (Post 10420657)
You forgot about the size and weight of Men's Wallets and Ladies Purses in the new politically correct bonus happy USAF.

To avoid discrimination I'm sure you also meant mens purses and ladies wallets ;)

ORAC 16th Mar 2019 20:35

I didn’t cut and paste - I used the words I wished.......


“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that's all.”

MightyGem 16th Mar 2019 21:54


in a variety of aircraft, including the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II
A 10 still going strong then. :ok:

Ascend Charlie 16th Mar 2019 22:20


weight range of 62.6kg (138lb) to 153kg (337lb). Total weight includes aircrew nude weight, aircrew flight equipment weight and survival kit weight.
Subtract the weight of the flight equipment and the survival kit from 62.6 Kg and you have a VERY light-weight nude pilot.

Pictures, please Slasher.....

Lonewolf_50 16th Mar 2019 23:34


Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie (Post 10420977)
Subtract the weight of the flight equipment and the survival kit from 62.6 Kg and you have a VERY light-weight nude pilot.

Pictures, please Slasher.....

Only if said picture is of a she. Slasher only swung one way, as I recall.

sandiego89 17th Mar 2019 13:45


Originally Posted by MightyGem (Post 10420958)
A 10 still going strong then. :ok:

Guess so. The A-10 retirement keeps getting moved to the right, and I thought the B-1 sundown would be happening as the B-21 comes on line. Bet the A-10 and B-1 retain their current ejection seats until retirement.

Fonsini 17th Mar 2019 18:25

I wonder what the acceleration numbers are like on the latest seats, spinal injuries were very common on early “bang” seats with their huge initial acceleration, but the later rocket seats helped immensely. I recall reading that experiments with soft seat cushions as opposed to hard cushions actually resulted in worse injuries.

Ejection seat technology is fascinating.

Blossy 17th Mar 2019 18:27

At the end of the day (which appears to be of infinite length!) it will come down to 'nice to have' or 'must have' in the minds of the brass hats.

NutLoose 18th Mar 2019 00:46

They will be dusting down the old meat box :)

Tankertrashnav 18th Mar 2019 11:59

Lonewolf - ejector/ejections seats? You say flight suit, we say flying suit, you say airplane we say aeroplane, you say (eg) 214th Squadron, we say 214 Squadron, etc. Does it really matter? We both know what the other is talking about. :)

Lonewolf_50 18th Mar 2019 12:58

Here's a reason why to get it right, TTN.
A Triple Ejector Rack carries bombs.
See also here

The Ejection seat carries the bomber(as in, the person bombing).
If you spend enough time in the military you learn the need for correct terminology.




Just This Once... 18th Mar 2019 13:09

We say 'EJECT'; you say 'BAILOUT'.

We do of course, bail-out water from the bottom of the survival dingy to stop our bottoms getting wet. Conversely, you get your fannies wet, which can surprise us.

None of this matters.

Herod 18th Mar 2019 13:09

Lonewolf; Expect incoming from TTN. I suspect he has more military time than you. And on a real aeroplane (English spelling) to boot.

Lonewolf_50 18th Mar 2019 13:39


Originally Posted by Just This Once... (Post 10422455)
We say 'EJECT'; you say 'BAILOUT'.

You are mistaken.
We say eject on aircraft with ejection seats.
We say bail out on aircraft without them.
Just so that you understand the difference, for over 30 years the USN's primary trainer was the T-34C, which required a bail out under various conditions. For 20 or so years before that, the T-28 B and C were also bail out/parachute equipped primary training aircraft.
At the same time, the advanced trainers -- T-2, TA-4, then T-45, were all ejection seat aircraft.

Likewise the T-37/Tweet. Primary training, ejection seat, and we still say eject. Likewise in the T-6 Texan II.

Old adage among the American carrier pilots: "There are those who have ejected, and those who will."

@Herod: Our military has DOPMA, yours does not.
After 25 years, my up or out choice was to choose to stay until 28, one last assignment somewhere else, or to hang up the cleats and stay where I was.
With the kids settled in schools, and the wife finishing her degree, it was time. I was never going to be an admiral.
Bring it.

golfbananajam 18th Mar 2019 14:49

Lonewolf_50 I suspect the real difference here is that we speak English and you don't

hat coat etc


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.