PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Red Arrows on channel 5 - 'Kings Of The Sky' (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/616838-red-arrows-channel-5-kings-sky.html)

Bill Macgillivray 17th Jan 2019 20:36

Not a great fan of television at the best of times, but I was impressed with last night's presentation. Came over very nicely, I thought. Brought back some fond memories of the early '70's when I escorted the team (Gnats) over the "pond" on their first trip to the States (I had the Vulcan!). Great bunch then and they still seem to have the same attitude today! Keep going, guys!

Bill

OldAgeandTreachery 17th Jan 2019 20:39

Much was made,in the second episode,of the photographer being awarded and securing her position in "The Circus". In the commentary about them it was mentioned that they fly in the rear seat and then service the jet after transit. Who then does the work on the photographers aircraft? She is in a non techie trade and cannot carry out flight servicings:- So does someone have to double up?
Agree that it seems to give good coverage to the squadron and not just the "Red" bit.

andrewn 17th Jan 2019 21:06

Like some on here, I tend to almost deliberately stay away from series like this for fear of being disappointed, but given the recommendations from family, and the good words here, I watched last nights episode.

I thought it was OK, but nothing more for me anyway. I found some of the flying sequences a bit repetitive, and the same with much of the ground stuff as well.

Some of the insight into the how the Reds function as a unit, and how different they appear to be from any other RAF squadron, was interesting. I kind of expected much of the uniqueness of the Reds to have been ironed out by successive H&S and compliance mandates, but glad it seems to still persevere!

Was also sad to see the shocking state of their line hut / accommodation, and Scampton generally. Can't help but thinkng there's nowhere better (location wise) for them though. Even if they end up moving down the A1 to Wittering you can imagine they'd still use the overhead for practicing, just like they did last time they closed Scampton.

I just wish the government would grow some balls, and a sense of pride, and spend some cash on the poor place!

And, yes, I also was moved by the footage of the Cpl - very sad loss obviously.

Wensleydale 17th Jan 2019 21:12


Surely the new pilots have LOTS of experience of formation flying, so why the big deal?
Secondly, why on eath. do the blues need to swin 4 lengrhs of a pool in a flying suit ?

In my day, dinghy drill, the training was to board your dinghy attached
, to your life jacket, supported by your Mae West, and an in immersion suit. Etc.,

No swimming required !
You obviously retired before the PTIs got their hands on the currency checklists!!

H Peacock 17th Jan 2019 23:12


Surely the new pilots have LOTS of experience of formation flying, so why the big deal?
Because the guys gave to learn to do so much of it 'procedurally' . Does any other outfit teach guys to start applying a control input based on the leader's voice command? If you get the chance to fly with the team you'll see how impressive it is! The only way to make a big formation that tight whilst manoeuvring!

Tashengurt 18th Jan 2019 04:59


Originally Posted by H Peacock (Post 10363616)


. Does any other outfit teach guys to start applying a control input based on the leader's voice command?

I believe the Blue angels use the same method.

Stitchbitch 18th Jan 2019 06:28


Originally Posted by Tashengurt (Post 10363713)
I believe the Blue angels use the same method.

..as did the ex-Reds fighter pilots on the Flight.

Listening to the comms during the opposition Spit display at RIAT one year, you’d have been forgiven for thinking they’d been on the Helium during strap in. 🤣. Old habits never fade?

kemblejet01 18th Jan 2019 18:04

Back when Team pilots had hair, Boss had Joe Pasquale in the boot. Rest of us did the radio calls in Pasquale style. Infantile humour appreciated by the man himself.

Odanrot 18th Jan 2019 19:30

When little joe was asked what he wanted to be when he grew up he replied, a fighter pilot!

Dont’t be silly his mother replied, you can’t do both!
I remember 1980 (I think) when I helped convert the Arrows from Gnats to Hawks, it was much the same.

Odanrot 18th Jan 2019 19:43

Another thought. Soon, like 3 days, it’s the anniversary of the Kemble head on in 1971. John Haddock died in that accident. He was my first QFI at Syerston. Not an easy man to get to know but the reason I flew fast jets.

Respect, good memories and thanks.

Il Duce 24th Jan 2019 21:09

From Wednesday's episode I take it that if a member of the Circus is flying in the back and he/she and the pilot have to eject over water, the pilot is rescued by helicopter and the Circus member is rescued by boat?

sycamore 24th Jan 2019 21:19

ID,it used to be that the pilot could walk home...

BVRAAM 25th Jan 2019 15:45

This series has given me a whole new level of respect for Red 1.

I can't even begin to imagine how much capacity is required to talk in the way he does while keeping the jet in formation and making those control inputs. "Perty" is a legend.

MPN11 25th Jan 2019 17:07

Three episodes in and I am still rather impressed by the sensible detail instead of the usual Meeja bullshot.

A very convincing expose of what really is involved in doing ‘diddley-up’ and, indeed, flying ‘quite fast’ jets. Respect.

orca 25th Jan 2019 17:27

I think the programme is brilliant - and I’ll be honest, I’m impressed by what they do - but have never been an an out and out fan of the nation possessing an aerobatic team from a capability stand point.
My only pick up point is the voice over to the opening shots which implies that the team are all combat veterans...which I’m not sure is correct.
I think that there’s something appropriate in the frugality of the set up. Just my opinion but white boards and traditional accommodation is spot on for a unit practising close formation in Hawks. They do it very well and they’re coming across brilliantly.

MPN11 25th Jan 2019 18:28

I was actually admiring the office accommodation for a flt lt, which in my day as a wg cdr at MoD had 5 senior officers in about that space!!

Megaton 26th Jan 2019 00:46


I was actually admiring the office accommodation for a flt lt
Their own office is one of the perks of being part of the Synchro Pair. None of the other pilots, bar Red 1, has one.

PPRuNeUser0211 26th Jan 2019 09:17


Originally Posted by orca (Post 10370745)
I think the programme is brilliant - and I’ll be honest, I’m impressed by what they do - but have never been an an out and out fan of the nation possessing an aerobatic team from a capability stand point.
My only pick up point is the voice over to the opening shots which implies that the team are all combat veterans...which I’m not sure is correct.
I think that there’s something appropriate in the frugality of the set up. Just my opinion but white boards and traditional accommodation is spot on for a unit practising close formation in Hawks. They do it very well and they’re coming across brilliantly.

Orca - not having a dig, but I'd be interested to know how many people in the RAF who have operated a front line aircraft at the present time are NOT combat veterans (if we define "combat" as an operational tour where where some operational effect is delivered, for the sake of our multi-engine brethren.)

As for the reds, I'm pretty confident that all of them have done a det or 6 to a sunny eastern med location or, even better, further east. I stand ready to be corrected though, there's always someone who manages to buck the trend.

Melchett01 26th Jan 2019 10:36


Originally Posted by pba_target (Post 10371295)
Orca - not having a dig, but I'd be interested to know how many people in the RAF who have operated a front line aircraft at the present time are NOT combat veterans (if we define "combat" as an operational tour where where some operational effect is delivered, for the sake of our multi-engine brethren.)

As for the reds, I'm pretty confident that all of them have done a det or 6 to a sunny eastern med location or, even better, further east. I stand ready to be corrected though, there's always someone who manages to buck the trend.

One of the criteria for selection is that they must have completed a front line role. By that very point, given the UK’s constant involvement in the Middle East and Asia since 1991 they will have some form of operational experience under their belts. A fair few of the current crop also appear to have a Hawk background beyond being a student, either having a tour as an instructor or on 100 Sqn which probably gives them a greater degree of ‘feel’ and experience for handling the Hawk.

Red Arrows team members

orca 27th Jan 2019 06:09

Thank you to the last two posters. I am aware of the selection criteria and the Op tempo. I am however not swayed by the ‘therefore they must have’ argument. I’m still not convinced that all the Hawk operators we’ve seen are veterans of combat, which is not a dig at their commitment, professionalism or how brilliantly they’re coming across.

Edited to add: If one were to have a brief look at the mess dinner in episode 1 you could conclude that MOD agrees that at least two of the team are not combat veterans. Or they are choosing not to wear campaign medals...which would be odd. This matters not a jot - my point was about an inaccurate voice over.

FWIW - and far more emotively I hold the belief, rightly or wrongly, that only a subset of those with campaign medals will actually be combat veterans as the criteria for award rarely features combat. I would define a combat veteran as anyone who was within effective weapons range of hostiles during fighting, or similar.

Excellent programme.

jindabyne 27th Jan 2019 09:48

Combat ready?

oldmansquipper 27th Jan 2019 10:05


Originally Posted by MPN11 (Post 10370781)
I was actually admiring the office accommodation for a flt lt, which in my day as a wg cdr at MoD had 5 senior officers in about that space!!

After I retired, I recall visiting an old mate at HQSTC on business. He was an Engineer Gp Capt by this time. He was in a very small outer office with another Gp Capt along side him. They were 'supervised' by a mid grade civil servant who had her own inner office.

Progress I guess?

PPRuNeUser0211 27th Jan 2019 11:30


Originally Posted by orca (Post 10372138)


FWIW - and far more emotively I hold the belief, rightly or wrongly, that only a subset of those with campaign medals will actually be combat veterans as the criteria for award rarely features combat. I would define a combat veteran as anyone who was within effective weapons range of hostiles during fighting, or similar.

Excellent programme.

I'm interested in your definition Orca (and certainly not wishing to pick a fight), but by extension to your definition, most RAF FJ pilots from the Shader era are not "combat veterans" despite having dropped live weapons on to hostile forces (who may indeed be in contact with friendly forces at the time). I think a few people (not least a few DFC recipients) might choose to disagree?

orca 27th Jan 2019 12:04

How did they drop weapons on people if they weren’t within effective weapons range?

If they were employing lethal force then they were certainly fighting within effective weapon range.

My definition probably falls down when it comes to the drone community. Maybe I should have just said that a combat vet is exactly that, not someone who spent time in a JOA.

PPRuNeUser0211 27th Jan 2019 14:19

My bad, I thought you meant effective weapons range of an enemy weapons system! Drone operators will always be a challenignc one to define I agree, though I've absolute respect for what they do/go through.

BEagle 28th Jan 2019 07:13

orca wrote:

I would define a combat veteran as anyone who was within effective weapons range of hostiles during fighting, or similar.
Such as everyone subjected to Scud attacks in GW1? Not a particularly good determinant...

It is indeed a very good programme - this week's will be very interesting.

Tashengurt 28th Jan 2019 09:04


Originally Posted by BEagle (Post 10373073)
orca wrote:

Such as everyone subjected to Scud attacks in GW1? Not a particularly good determinant...

It is indeed a very good programme - this week's will be very interesting.

I was thinking along similar lines to BEagle.
I was on the receiving end of Scuds at Dharhan but I wouldn't consider myself a combat veteran. I think that's stretching the definition.

orca 28th Jan 2019 11:47

Without wanting to labour the point Beagle, Tashengurt - if you (or anyone else) came under an attack then you were within effective weapons range...

I would, however like to apologise for my part in definition/ pedantry/ thread drift etc which has spawned from simply pointing out that the voice over was incorrect in an otherwise great programme.

Tay Cough 28th Jan 2019 12:17

Nicely done without being over the top. I may even head to Scampton this afternoon to watch if anyone knows which slot they’re using.

Eclat means brilliant. :}

Timelord 30th Jan 2019 21:01

Bravo Zulu to the film makers. That was a difficult subject tastefully and respectfully done.

Parson 31st Jan 2019 11:10

Did Starky not recover sufficiently to rejoin the team for 2019?

DON T 31st Jan 2019 13:13


Originally Posted by Timelord (Post 10375910)
Bravo Zulu to the film makers. That was a difficult subject tastefully and respectfully done.


Couldn’t agree more.👍

DON T 31st Jan 2019 13:19


Originally Posted by Parson (Post 10376324)
Did Starky not recover sufficiently to rejoin the team for 2019?


He is not included in the Team:

https://www.raf.mod.uk/display-teams...isplay-season/

Parson 31st Jan 2019 18:40

DON T - yeah i know, thats why I asked. I was wondering if he hadnt recovered sufficiently to rejoin.

thegypsy 10th Feb 2019 13:30

Just watched the latest which I recorded and somewhat disappointed to hear the leader pronounce schedule as skedule:rolleyes:

Got off a BA flight ( A320 ) where the F/O who was flying it stood by the door when we were offloading at LHR ( When did they start doing that? ) who likewise pronounced it as skedule. I probably embarrassed him by pointing out the errors of his ways poor lad. I keep hearing it on BBC too from people who should know better.

Nige321 10th Feb 2019 14:11


Originally Posted by thegypsy (Post 10385930)
Just watched the latest which I recorded and somewhat disappointed to hear the leader pronounce schedule as skedule:rolleyes:

Got off a BA flight ( A320 ) where the F/O who was flying it stood by the door when we were offloading at LHR ( When did they start doing that? ) who likewise pronounced it as skedule. I probably embarrassed him by pointing out the errors of his ways poor lad. I keep hearing it on BBC too from people who should know better.

No, you just embarressed yourself...:ugh:

XV490 10th Feb 2019 16:14


Originally Posted by thegypsy (Post 10385930)
Just watched the latest which I recorded and somewhat disappointed to hear the leader pronounce schedule as skedule

In reply to which our American friends ask: "So why do you Brits say 'skool'?"
Anyway, excellent effort by Channel 5, for a change.

BEagle 10th Feb 2019 20:16

Bastardisation of the English language is deplorable - even the BBC has dropped its RP standards due to the Islington metrognomes and the influence of meeja-city Northern English accents. Tha' knaws

A few examples:
'Reeesearch' instead of 'Rissearch'
"I'm good" instead of "I'm well" or "I'm fine"
Americans stress the wrong word in 2 word phrases such as 'Robin Hood' or 'Top Gear'- so now the BBC uses 'TOPgear' instead of 'TopGEAR'

thegypsy, I trust you cuffed the young sprog about the swede and banned him from making any PAannouncements until he'd learned to speak proper Nigel-speak?

Anyway, back to the plot as Kenny Everett would say. The Channel 5 'Kings of the Sky' programme really is rather good - apart from the '4-point barrel roll' guff.

Private jet 10th Feb 2019 21:35


Bastardisation of the English language is deplorable - even the BBC has dropped its RP standards due to the Islington metrognomes and the influence of meeja-city Northern English accents. Tha' knaws
Language is, was, and always will be an evolving means of communication. Not a set in stone museum piece. If you personally cannot, or will not, accept or adapt to it then maybe you are just above your station or alternatively your era is past and you should maybe just be quiet?

BEagle 10th Feb 2019 21:58

Private jet, that's not really true. Down to the laziness of school teachers who lower their standards instead of insisting on correct use of English. There was a very interesting series on TV recently 'Back in Time for School', hosted by someone called Sara Cox. Her standard of English was pitiful, as was that of many of the alleged teachers.

As for the pupils, it seems that 'like' is like, used during each piece of like dialogue. Innit...like?


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:24.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.