The Jaguar original design was as an advanced trainer IIRC.
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ow%2C_1986.jpg
Experimental Aircraft Program (EAP) was actually the last British designed, paid for and flown - I think the Govt stumped up £80M and the company the rest. The Italian Aeritalia was a sub-contractor and MBB couldn’t raise the cash. The Eurofighter and its consortium came from this later down the line. |
Originally Posted by Lima Juliet
(Post 10085026)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ow%2C_1986.jpg
Experimental Aircraft Program (EAP) was actually the last British designed, paid for and flown - I think the Govt stumped up £80M and the company the rest. The Italian Aeritalia was a sub-contractor and MBB couldn’t raise the cash. The Eurofighter and its consortium came from this later down the line. I did mention this before in another topic but was told by others who know far more than me about EAP that it was not possible to productionise it. |
On display at RAF Museum, Cosford.
|
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
(Post 10084478)
Nothing wrong with a bit of blue-sky thinking, but lets keep things real. Canada's expertise, capacity, and governmental backing in the field of defence aerospace don't come close to France's.
In no way would we ever be on the same scale as France but to give you an idea about the trajectory they are aiming for here, they've announced an AUD5-15 Billion investment in APC type vehicles. I used Canada as an example because they have an Aerospace industry to start with. Anyway, just a thought. :ok: |
As regards my namesake, the Italians were partners (designed one of the wings and contributed to other systems) and while the MOD financed the demonstration of some of the technologies, it would be unfair to omit the fact that all of the suppliers of systems, avionics and parts did so at their own expense. Rolls Royce, GEC Marconi, Smiths, Dowty, Lucas, Normalair, MBA to name only a few. Apols for the ones I've missed.
Productionisation would have been difficult; weight reduction would have been essential, a proper fighter engine fitted and the bits that didn't work out replaced. The lessons were still used to benefit Typhoon so no loss. EAP |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 10084907)
The Jaguar original design was as an advanced trainer IIRC.
|
A type of beefed up next-gen Strikemaster?
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 10085575)
A type of beefed up next-gen Strikemaster?
|
A sort of FTS Gnat and TWU Hunter replacement...
|
I was always bemused at the idea of the Jag being a trainer considering the unusual control surfaces and handling.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 10085878)
I was always bemused at the idea of the Jag being a trainer considering the unusual control surfaces and handling.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 10084907)
The Jaguar original design was as an advanced trainer IIRC.
pouf have a beefed up ground attack aircraft instead! |
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
(Post 10083397)
Which Commonwealth country with a domestic aerospace industry the size, expertise, capacity and governmental backing as France's are you thinking of?
Originally Posted by melmothtw
(Post 10083861)
There you go, we can go into business with India. A country who's aviation industry is famed for its innovation, its efficiency, and its ability to undertake complex projects to budget and to deadline. Oh Lordy....!
Seems to me UK could do it all except UK does not have the money. That is why involving a Commonwealth country that has money for defence innovation (like India) and is hungry for opportunity to partner with an honest technilogically advanced country, would be a good idea. How many past UK French defence collaborative programs have been satisfactory from UK standpoint? When will UK learn from past events? |
Ahhh the importance of a single word..
"Except".......... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.