PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Biggest Non Nuke Dropped in Afghanistan (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/593468-biggest-non-nuke-dropped-afghanistan.html)

charliegolf 13th Apr 2017 16:49

Biggest Non Nuke Dropped in Afghanistan
 
CNN reporting...

Dropped from a cargo aircraft apparently. An ISIS camp and tunnel system was the target.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/13/po...omb/index.html

MPN11 13th Apr 2017 17:00

Excellent. Out.

charliegolf 13th Apr 2017 17:03

Loadie with his finger on the button then!

Lyneham Lad 13th Apr 2017 17:16


It was the first time this type of bomb had been used in combat and was dropped from a MC-130 aircraft, Pentagon spokesman Adam Stump said.
- Reuters report.

Molemot 13th Apr 2017 17:53

I seem to recall that the Grand Slam was 22,000lbs.....(!)

pasta 13th Apr 2017 17:58

22,000 lbs was the total weight of the Grand Slam; according to Wikipedia (which we all know can be relied upon without question) it "only" contained 9,136 lbs of explosive.

Lyneham Lad 13th Apr 2017 18:02


Originally Posted by Molemot (Post 9739138)
I seem to recall that the Grand Slam was 22,000lbs.....(!)

According to that font of all knowledge, the GBU-43/B weighs in at 22,600lbs.

reds & greens 13th Apr 2017 18:05

That'll smart a bit...

RAFEngO74to09 13th Apr 2017 18:15

GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB)
 
http://i.imgur.com/CXJiuMK.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9H50tHiHjs

West Coast 13th Apr 2017 19:05

The laborers in NK are being told to dig a little deeper.

1771 DELETE 13th Apr 2017 21:13

didn't look like an air blast to me ?

Saintsman 13th Apr 2017 21:20

Just curious as to the effect on the aircraft as the bomb is released. It's one big load to suddenly not be carrying.

fltlt 13th Apr 2017 21:31


Originally Posted by Saintsman (Post 9739331)
Just curious as to the effect on the aircraft as the bomb is released. It's one big load to suddenly not be carrying.

Same as a laxative perhaps.

Chris Scott 13th Apr 2017 22:10

Remarkable that this MOAB had to be dropped from the cargo ramp of a Herc, presumably in the absence of any current bomber capable of accommodating it?

Roy Chadwick's late-1930s design, slightly modified, might have done the job:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_...aduct_1945.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_..._Slam_bomb.jpg

blimey 13th Apr 2017 22:14

My hat blew off today. I now know why.

DJT apparently letting the military just get on with it. There's a thought.

Two's in 13th Apr 2017 22:24

Let's see some BDA before we get too euphoric. We don't quite have a solid track record of hitting barn doors with banjos in that area.

gums 13th Apr 2017 22:25

Big bombs
 
Salute!

Living here at Eglin where many weapons have been developed and tested, I have no small insight.

I helped with the intitial JDAM bomb to increase accuracy and then employ a terminal seeker to enhance the "end game". Did pilot displays and controls for the Mmwave Maverick. Did crew displays for the USN A-12 before it was cancelled. And the beat goes on.

So I drove out west 30 miles and found a good hill to see the second MOAB test and enjoyed it. It does not have a "sharp" crack as the other bombs I dropped in combat or witnessed from the ground. The Herc pulls a drogue chute and then lets the bomb roll out. The chute is released and the MOAB guidance takes over. I watched with my binoculars until the thing got just below the trees on a small ridge. Then the musroom cloud and 20 seconds later I heard it.

The bomb is not a "contact fuze" demolition doofer. It is some kinda a "thermobaric" thing and explodes a hundred feet or more above ground.

Later,

Gums sends...

Chris Scott 13th Apr 2017 22:32

Salute gums!

"The bomb is not a "contact fuze" demolition doofer. I thing is a "thermobaric" thing and explodes a hundred feet or more above ground."

Very different from Grand Slam, then, which was a deeply-penetrating earthquake bomb with a very strong casing.

Titania 13th Apr 2017 22:53


Originally Posted by gums (Post 9739400)
Salute!

Living here at Eglin where many weapons have been developed and tested, I have no small insight.

I helped with the intitial JDAM bomb to increase accuracy and then employ a terminal seeker to enhance the "end game". Did pilot displays and controls for the Mmwave Maverick. Did crew displays for the USN A-12 before it was cancelled. And the beat goes on.

So I drove out west 30 miles and found a good hill to see the second MOAB test and enjoyed it. It does not have a "sharp" crack as the other bombs I dropped in combat or witnessed from the ground. The Herc pulls a drogue chute and then lets the bomb roll out. The chute is released and the MOAB guidance takes over. I watched with my binoculars until the thing got just below the trees on a small ridge. Then the musroom cloud and 20 seconds later I heard it.

The bomb is not a "contact fuze" demolition doofer. It is some kinda a "thermobaric" thing and explodes a hundred feet or more above ground.

Later,

Gums sends...

So how long does it take to fall down with the chute from what typical height?

tartare 13th Apr 2017 23:16

Wifey who is a tv news producer wants to know if its the first time moab has been used in anger? Apparently not?

dynamics 14th Apr 2017 00:08


Originally Posted by tartare (Post 9739459)
Wifey who is a tv news producer wants to know if its the first time moab has been used in anger? Apparently not?

CNN reporting that it is. Perhaps more of a live test, than a necessity.

dynamics 14th Apr 2017 00:11


Originally Posted by Saintsman (Post 9739331)
Just curious as to the effect on the aircraft as the bomb is released. It's one big load to suddenly not be carrying.

Sudden pitch up followed by an immediate correction, by the looks of it...


ExAscoteer 14th Apr 2017 00:44

Not much different to dropping an MSP then.

ORAC 14th Apr 2017 05:16


GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB)
Alternatively - Mother Of All Bombs.

Not sure which name came first.

TURIN 14th Apr 2017 06:28


Originally Posted by Molemot (Post 9739138)
I seem to recall that the Grand Slam was 22,000lbs.....(!)

I also seem to recall that it was designed to create an earthquake like effect. Probably more effective against underground tunnels than an airburst perhaps.

ORAC 14th Apr 2017 07:00

Wont damage the structure as much, but much more efficient at killing the inhabitants. The initial overpressure then following rarefaction ruptures the lungs of those in the caves and tunnels - in fact the channel and increase the effect.

What Is The MOAB? An Explainer On The Biggest Non-Nuclear Bomb

TEEEJ 14th Apr 2017 07:03


Originally Posted by Chris Scott (Post 9739388)
Remarkable that this MOAB had to be dropped from the cargo ramp of a Herc, presumably in the absence of any current bomber capable of accommodating it?

Roy Chadwick's late-1930s design, slightly modified, might have done the job:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_...aduct_1945.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_..._Slam_bomb.jpg

The B-52 and B-2 can carry the heavier GBU-57.

https://theaviationist.com/wp-conten...10/B-2-MOP.jpg

MOPping Up: The USA?s 30,000 Pound GBU-57 Bomb

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massiv...nce_Penetrator

Just This Once... 14th Apr 2017 08:33


Originally Posted by Chris Scott (Post 9739388)
Remarkable that this MOAB had to be dropped from the cargo ramp of a Herc, presumably in the absence of any current bomber capable of accommodating it?

You should probably look at that from the other way round. The USAF has the flexibility to be able to drop munitions such as this from in-theatre aircraft without the disproportionate effort required to use a B-52 or B-2 for the same task.

Pontius Navigator 14th Apr 2017 08:53


Originally Posted by Lyneham Lad (Post 9739146)
According to that font of all knowledge, the GBU-43/B weighs in at 22,600lbs.

A Reuters reports 21,600lbs. As Reuters report was probably from the Pentagon I think we can say Grand Slam has it.

How do you count casualties with such certainty?

As ORAC says, the MOAB kills by overpressure so maybe a satellite count from the evacuation. With Grand Slam it would take weeks of careful mining to excavate the camouflet.

ericferret 14th Apr 2017 09:57

Danger UXB? (C) Steve Fareham :: Geograph Britain and Ireland

The Lincolnshire Popular Front has aquired it's own grand slam which we have hidden in a secret location. Now waiting for "Just Jane" to become airworthy again and we are in business.

http://www.lincsaviation.co.uk/

pax britanica 14th Apr 2017 10:12

Dont think it would be much good on a B2 kind of ruins all that Stealthy stuff. I assumed it would be B52 as the carrier as it must seem like an age to a Herc crew lugging it over bad guy territory and then getting out of the way. Precision and non precison bomb at the same time

dragartist 14th Apr 2017 11:07

Looking at google earth it appears they have cleared the scrap compound up at Laguna Airfield at Yuma Proving Ground since I was last there 6 years ago. Still some remnants of the early airdrop tests.
Ex Ascot - More like a PURIBAD really. similar methods for separating the payload from the platform after extraction.
I do think however that the Grandslam approach would have made the cave system unusable.

ancientaviator62 14th Apr 2017 12:09

If we discuss weight dropped and trim change for the Hercules then a triple ULLA drop (42000lbs) from a C130K might take some beating.
However I think the 'daddy' of them all has to be the ICBM dropped from a C5 !

ORAC 14th Apr 2017 12:35

Pax,

The B-2 carries it internally - that exotic shape is wrapped around a very large bomb bay.


https://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/...er-buster.html

pax britanica 14th Apr 2017 12:44

Orac

Thanks for clearing that up-I thought it very odd otherwise . I think the picture perspective makes the bomb look bigger than it is and the B2 Bomb Bay smaller than it is.

A B52 with one either side would pretty cool though.

I wonder if this was also a demo to Lil Fat Kim sought of 'look out we don't need nukes to destroy underground complexes'. Someone as bad as Kim must a have a super gigantic underground complex if the James Bond law that all megalomaniac baddies live in underground fortresses with pools of steaming liquids , men and women in tight clothes watching radar screens and klaxons

gums 14th Apr 2017 13:45

Salute!

The B-2 picture seems to make the bomb look bigger than it really is.

OTOH, I did "fit checks" on the plane for the JDAM and another weapon. The bays are huge! You can put your auto in one. After all, it can carry 80 MK-82 boms, no kidding - 80 friggin' bombs all internal. Each bay handles 8 x 2000 lb JDAM on rotary launchers.

We have the main Special Ops base here, besides the Armament Development folks. So my neighbor (a MC-130 pilot) across the street dropped one of the older 'Daisy Cutter" bombs back in Desert Storm. We later had another MC-130 troop move in two doors down, but he didn't drop a big one in the second Iraq deal, and I don't think any were used. They said the loss of weight was not all that bad as long as you had the bird trimmed strongly nose down before the sucker rolled out the back.

Interestingly, we tried the original FAE doofers back in my day in 'nam. They were advertised the same about overpressure and using it on cave/tunnel complexes. They didn't have the mixture mechanism perfected and some of them fizzled and others only produced a small fireball and no "explosion", they were kinda like a Hollywood special effect with lottsa deisel fuel and gasoline.

They ain't kidding about the shockwave effects, though. We saw the bad guys shooting right outta the smoke from our nape. But if we dropped a MK-82 or bigger close to a gun position they didn't shoot for a minute or more. 'course, a direct hit was "game over".

Gums sends...

The Sultan 14th Apr 2017 13:52

Reported only 36 killed in MOAB strike which equates to $500K per kill. Not a good return on use of a limited asset. In Trumpet's world at $16M a piece the MOAB is three rounds of golf.

BlackIsle 14th Apr 2017 14:12

North Korean missile facilities next on the mailing list?

langleybaston 14th Apr 2017 14:46

The problem with NK may be that nobody dares tell Lil Fat Kim what he needs to know, so he does the nuke test and then DT gets proud of the military again.

On second thoughts, why not?

SASless 14th Apr 2017 14:57

PN,

When you get into the "Kick Ass and take no names!" Mode....who cares about doing a Tally of bad guys rendered Combat Ineffective!


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.